Regulation of peripheral vascular tone in patients with heart failure:Contribution of angiotensin II

Objective—To determine directly the contribution of angiotensin II to basal and sympathetically stimulated peripheral arteriolar tone in patients with heart failure.
Design—Parallel group comparison.
Subjects—Nine patients with New York Heart Association grade II-IV chronic heart failure, and age and sex matched controls.
Interventions—Forearm plethysmography, lower body negative pressure, local intra-arterial administration of losartan, angiotensin II, and noradrenaline, and estimation of plasma hormone concentrations.
Main outcome measures—Forearm blood flow responses, plasma hormone concentrations.
Results—Baseline blood pressure, heart rate, and forearm blood flow did not differ between patients and controls. In comparison with the non-infused forearm, losartan did not affect basal forearm blood flow (95% confidence interval −5.5% to +7.3%) or sympathetically stimulated vasoconstriction in controls. However, the mean (SEM) blood flow in patients increased by 13(5)% and 26(7)% in response to 30 and 90 µg/min of losartan respectively (p < 0.001). Lower body negative pressure caused a reduction in forearm blood flow of 20(5)% in controls (p = 0.008) and 13(5)% (p = 0.08) in patients (p = 0.007, controls v patients). Blood flow at 90 µg/min of losartan correlated with plasma angiotensin II concentration (r = 0.77; p = 0.03). Responses to angiotensin II and noradrenaline did not differ between patients and controls.
Conclusions—Losartan causes acute local peripheral arteriolar vasodilatation in patients with heart failure but not in healthy control subjects. Endogenous angiotensin II directly contributes to basal peripheral arteriolar tone in patients with heart failure but does not augment sympathetically stimulated peripheral vascular tone.

 Keywords: angiotensin II;  heart failure;  peripheral vascular tone;  sympathetic nervous syste

Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin in Patients With Vascular Disease and Renal Dysfunction From the COMPASS Trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is associated with an increased risk of both bleeding and ischemic cardiovascular events.OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the balance of risks and benefits from the dual pathway antithrombotic regimen (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily [bd] plus aspirin, compared with aspirin) in vascular patients with or without moderate renal dysfunction.METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the COMPASS (Cardiovascular OutcoMes for People using Anticoagulation StrategieS) trial involving 27,395 patients with chronic coronary or peripheral artery disease.RESULTS: In COMPASS, 21,111 patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline of >= 60 ml/min, 6,276 had a GRF of = 60 ml/min, 3.5% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 4.5% aspirin alone, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64 to 0.90; GFR = 60 ml/min (2.9% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 1.6% aspirin alone, HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.28) and similarly in those with GFR </div

A comparison of hirudin with heparin in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty

__Background:__ The likelihood of restenosis is a major limitation of coronary angioplasty. We studied whether hirudin, a highly selective inhibitor of thrombin with irreversible effects, would prevent restenosis after angioplasty. We compared two regimens of recombinant hirudin with heparin. __Methods:__ We randomly assigned 1141 patients with unstable angina who were scheduled for angioplasty to receive one of three treatments: (1) a bolus dose of 10,000 IU of heparin followed by an intravenous infusion of heparin for 24 hours and subcutaneous placebo twice daily for three days (382 patients), (2) a bolus dose of 40 mg of hirudin followed by an intravenous infusion of hirudin for 24 hours and subcutaneous placebo twice daily for three days (381 patients), or (3) the same hirudin regimen except that 40 mg of hirudin was given subcutaneously instead of placebo twice daily for three days (378 patients). The primary end point was event-free survival at seven months. Other end points were early cardiac events (within 96 hours), bleeding and other complications of the study treatment, and angiographic measurements of coronary diameter at six months of follow-up. __Results:__ At seven months, event-free survival was 67.3 percent in the group receiving heparin, 63.5 percent in the group receiving intravenous hirudin, and 68.0 percent in the group receiving both intravenous and subcutaneous hirudin (P=0.61). However, the administration of hirudin was associated with a significant reduction in early cardiac events, which occurred in 11.0, 7.9, and 5.6 percent of patients in the respective groups (combined relative risk with hirudin, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.90; P=0.023). The mean minimal luminal diameters in the respective groups on follow-up angiography at six months were 1.54, 1.47, and 1.56 mm. __Conclusions:__ Although significantly fewer early cardiac events occurred with hirudin than with heparin, hirudin had no apparent benefit with longer-term follow-up

Suradnja geodeta sa sudskim vještacima građevinske struke u postupku legalizacije objekata izgrađenih prije 15. veljače 1968. godine

U radu je opisana važnost prilaganja uporabne dozvole prilikom upisa objekata u zemljišne knjige. Iz novog zakona o državnoj izmjeri i katastru nekretnina (»Narodne novine«, broj 16/07) moguće je zaključiti kako će i katastarskim uredima građevna dokumentacija predstavljati važnu ulogu prilikom ovjere geodetskih elaborata upisa građevina. Detaljno je opisan postupak interakcije građevinskih vještaka sa geodetima prilikom evidentiranja građevina koje su izgrađene prije 15.veljače 1968., a nisu evidentirane u službenoj dokumentaciji Državne geodetske uprave. U radu su navedeni i sastavni dijelovi geodestkih elaborata kao i sastavni dijelovi elaborata o utvrđivanju starosti građevina

Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. RESULTS The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=−4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events. (Funded by Bayer; COMPASS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776424.

Inter-regional differences and outcome in unstable angina. Analysis of the International ESSENCE trial

Aims Worldwide there is a large variation in outcome (death, myocardial infarction and recurrent myocardial infarction) in patients with unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial infarction. These variations may be explained by differences in characteristics of the presenting patients. Here we describe differences in patient presentation, treatment protocols and outcome and we investigate their relationship using data from the ESSENCE (Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events) trial. Methods A total of 2981 patients from six countries which enrolled more than 100 patients were included in the present analysis: United States, Canada, Argentina, France, the Netherlands and United Kingdom. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of baseline characteristics on regional outcome. Results At day 30, the lowest triple end-point rate, irrespective of study drug treatment, was noted in the Netherlands (18·9%) and the highest in Argentina (30·5%). A model including the variables age ≥65 years, prior angina, diabetes, prior aspirin use, ECG changes at baseline and diagnosis of non-Q wave myocardial infarction and dummy variables for Argentina and France resulted in concordance of about 60%. Conclusions Inter-regional differences in outcome in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients can reasonably well be explained by differences in patient characteristics. However, other so far unidentified variables present in Argentina and France also contributed to differences in outcome and their effect warrants further investigation