A hidden reservoir of integrative elements is the major source of recently acquired foreign genes and ORFans in archaeal and bacterial genomes

A large-scale survey of potential recently acquired integrative elements in 119 archaeal and bacterial genomes reveals that many recently acquired genes have originated from integrative element

An emerging phylogenetic core of Archaea: phylogenies of transcription and translation machineries converge following addition of new genome sequences

BACKGROUND: The concept of a genomic core, defined as the set of genes ubiquitous in all genomes of a monophyletic group, has become crucial in comparative and evolutionary genomics. However, it is still a matter of debate whether lateral gene transfers (LGT) may affect the components of genomic cores, preventing their use to retrace species evolution. We have recently reconstructed the phylogeny of Archaea by using two large concatenated datasets of core proteins involved in translation and transcription, respectively. The resulting trees were largely congruent, showing that informational gene components of the archaeal genomic core belonging to two distinct molecular systems contain a coherent signal for archaeal phylogeny. However, some incongruence remained between the two phylogenies. This may be due either to undetected LGT and/or to a lack of sufficient phylogenetic signal in the datasets. RESULTS: We present evidence strongly favoring of the latter hypothesis. In fact, we have updated our transcription and translation datasets with five new archaeal genomes for a total of 6384 and 2928 amino acid positions, respectively, and 25 taxa. This increase in taxonomic sampling led to the nearly complete convergence of the transcription-based and translation-based trees on a single phylogenetic pattern for archaeal evolution. In fact, only a single incongruence persisted between the two phylogenies. This concerned Methanopyrus kandleri, whose placement remained strongly biased in the transcription tree due to its above average evolutionary rates, and could not be counterbalanced due to the lack of availability of closely related and/or slower-evolving relatives. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of evidence that the phylogenetic signal harbored by components of the archaeal translation apparatus is confirmed by additional markers belonging to a second molecular system (i.e. transcription). This rules out the risk of circularity when inferring species evolution by small subunit ribosomal RNA and ribosomal protein sequences, since it has been suggested that concerted LGT may affect these markers. Our results strongly support the existence of a core of proteins that has evolved mainly through vertical inheritance in Archaea, and carries a bona fide phylogenetic signal that can be used to retrace the evolutionary history of this domain. The identification and analysis of additional molecular markers not affected by LGT should continue defining the emerging picture of a genuine phylogenetic core for the third domain of life

Genomic context analysis in Archaea suggests previously unrecognized links between DNA replication and translation

Specific functional interactions of proteins involved in DNA replication and/or DNA repair or transcription might occur in Archaea, suggesting a previously unrecognized regulatory network coupling DNA replication and translation, which might also exist in Eukarya

Luca : à la recherche du plus proche ancêtre commun universel

L’application des méthodes de la biologie moléculaire à l’étude des premières étapes de l’évolution a montré que le monde vivant pouvait être divisé en trois domaines : archées, bactéries et eucaryotes. Cette découverte a mis à l’ordre du jour le problème de Luca, le dernier ancêtre commun à tous les organismes cellulaires actuels (thelast universal common ancestor). Ce problème peut être abordé aujourd’hui sur des bases plus solides, grâce à la génomique comparative : celle-ci nous apprend que Luca possédait une membrane cytoplasmique et un appareil de traduction déjà relativement sophistiqué. En revanche, la nature de son génome reste inconnue : faisait-il encore partie du monde à ARN, ou avait-il déjà un génome à ADN ? De nouvelles hypothèses sont avancées, qui font intervenir les virus dans l’apparition de l’ADN et la formation des trois domaines. Connaître Luca est essentiel si nous voulons retracer l’histoire évolutive des mécanismes moléculaires présents chez les organismes actuels.One of the most important outcomes of modern biology has been the demonstration of the unity of life. All living beings are in fact descendants of a unique ancestor commonly referred to as Luca (the Last universal common ancestor). The discovery — nearly 30 years ago by Carl Woese – that present-day life on our planet can be assigned to only three domains: two of prokaryotic nature (Archaea and Bacteria), and one eukaryoyic (Eucarya), has given birth to a new field of investigation aimed at determining the nature of Luca. Today, thanks to the accumulation of genomic data, we can loop back into the past and infer a few characters of Luca by comparing what present-day organisms have in common. For example, it is now clear that Luca was a cellular organism provided with a cytoplasmic membrane, and that it harboured already a quite sophisticated translation apparatus. However, the inference of other characters of Luca from comparative genomics is less straightforward: for instance, a few key molecular mechanisms for DNA replication are non-homologous across the three domains and their distribution is often puzzling. This evidence has been embraced by proponents of the hypothesis that Luca harboured an RNA genome and that its replacement by DNA and the appearance of the corresponding molecular systems would have occurred independently in the three life domains after their divergence. However, an equally likely scenario would be that of a Luca with a DNA genome and of a subsequent replacement of its DNA-replication systems by non-homologous counterparts either in the bacterial or in the archaeal/eukaroytic branch. Nevertheless, including the viral world into the picture of the tree of life may thus provide us with precious insights into our most distant past since the invention and spread potential of viruses may have played a key role in early evolution

A DNA topoisomerase IB in Thaumarchaeota testifies for the presence of this enzyme in the last common ancestor of Archaea and Eucarya

DNA topoisomerase IB (TopoIB) was thought for a long time to be a eukaryotic specific enzyme. A shorter version was then found in viruses and later on in several bacteria, but not in archaea. Here, we show that a eukaryotic-like TopoIB is present in the recently sequenced genomes of two archaea of the newly proposed phylum Thaumarchaeota. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that a TopoIB was present in the last common ancestor of Archaea and Eucarya. This finding indicates that the last common ancestor of Archaea and Eucarya may have harboured a DNA genome

Happy together: genomic insights into the unique Nanoarchaeum/Ignicoccus association

The complete genome sequence of the crenarchaeon Ignicoccus hospitalis published recently in Genome Biology provides a great leap forward in the dissection of its unique association with another hyperthermophilic archaeon, Nanoarchaeum equitans

Homomultimeric structure by assembly of sirv2 p98 proteins or p98 variants, conjugate and uses thereof

The present invention relates to a homomultimeric protein structure constituted by assembled monomers of the P98 protein of Sulfolobus islandicus rod-shaped virus 2 (SIRV2) or assembled monomer variants of said P98 protein. In a particular embodiment, this homomultimeric protein structure has a seven-fold rotational symmetry, and is found in an open conformation or closed conformation. A particular structure has the form of baseless 7-face pyramid. The invention also relates to a conjugate comprising or consisting of a homomultimeric protein structure of the invention to which one or more heterologous molecule(s) is attached. Furthermore, the invention also concerns a homomultimeric protein structure or a conjugate of the invention, inserted into or exposed at the surface of a lipid layer or bilayer, of a vesicle or of a cell, and their uses thereof

Caractérisation biochimique des machineries de biosynthèse de t6A, un nucléoside modifié universel

Les ARN de transfert, éléments centraux de la traduction, présentent une grande variété de nucléosides modifiés dérivés des nucléosides canoniques (A, U, G et C), qui modulent la stabilité, la capacité de décodage et l identité de ces molécules. t6A (thréonylcarbamoyl-N6-Adénosine) est un nucléoside hypermodifié retrouvé en position 37 (adjacent à l anticodon) au niveau de tous les ARNt qui s apparient aux codons de la forme ANN. Il joue un rôle essentiel dans la fidélité de traduction à travers deux fonctions principales : (i) il intervient dans le maintien de la bonne conformation de la boucle anticodon ; (ii) il facilite l appariement codon/anticodon afin d éviter le décalage de cadre de lecture durant la synthèse protéique. Ce nucléoside modifié est universel, présent chez les Archées, les Bactéries, les Eucaryotes, mais également chez les organites (mitochondries et chloroplastes), ce qui suggère que son apparition représente une acquisition évolutive importante et très ancienne, probablement antérieure au dernier ancêtre commun universel (LUCA). Pourtant, la voie de biosynthèse de t6A est restée inconnue pendant près de quarante ans.Récemment, des études de génétique ont montré que deux protéines universelles, Sua5/YrdC et Kae1/YgjD, sont nécessaires à sa synthèse chez Saccharomyces cerevisiae et Escherichia coli. Chez les Bactéries, la synthèse in vitro de t6A requiert la présence de deux autres protéines spécifiques à ce domaine du vivant : YeaZ et YjeE. Chez les Archées et les Eucaryotes, Kae1 (l orthologue de YgjD) fait partie d un complexe protéique conservé appelé KEOPS (pour Kinase Endopeptidase and Other Proteins of Small size), aux côtés de trois autres protéines : Bud32, Cgi121 et Pcc1, qui n ont pas d homologues chez les Bactéries. Depuis sa découverte en 2006 chez S.cerevisiae, ce complexe a été impliqué dans plusieurs processus cellulaires (homéostasie des télomères, maintien du génome, régulation de la transcription), sans que sa fonction ne soit clairement élucidée.Nous avons entrepris de caractériser et de comparer par une approche biochimique in vitro les machineries de biosynthèse de t6A issues des trois domaines du vivants, en utilisant comme organismes modèles l Archée Pyrococcus abyssi, l Eucaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae et la Bactérie Escherichia coli. (i) Nous avons montré pour la première fois que le complexe KEOPS et la protéine Sua5 catalysent ensemble la synthèse de t6A chez les Archées et les Eucaryotes. Nos résultats nous ont permis d élaborer un modèle de mécanisme catalytique, et nous avons montré par des expériences de complémentation in vitro que ce mécanisme est universel : les différents orthologues Sua5/YrdC sont interchangeables, et le complexe KEOPS est l analogue fonctionnel du trio de protéines YgjD/YeaZ/YjeE Bactérien. (ii) Nous avons alors étudié le rôle de chacune des sous-unités du complexe KEOPS de Pyrococcus abyssi dans la synthèse de t6A. Ainsi, nous avons montré que Kae1 est le seul composant catalytique stricto sensus et que les trois autres partenaires ont des fonctions distinctes dans la régulation de l activité catalytique. (iii) Enfin, nous avons étudié la synthèse de t6A chez la mitochondrie de S.cerevisiae, et avons montré que Sua5 et la protéine Qri7, l orthologue mitochondrial de Kae1/YgjD, catalysent ensemble la synthèse de t6A et constituent ainsi un système minimaliste à deux composants.Ces résultats ouvrent la voie à une compréhension détaillée du mécanisme de biosynthèse de t6A dans les trois domaines du vivant, et permettent de proposer des scénarii évolutifs concernant l histoire de la machinerie de synthèse de ce nucléoside modifié universel.Transfer RNA are central elements of the translational system and carry a large diversity of modified nucleosides (derived from canonical nucleosides A, U, G, and C), which tune the stability, the decoding capacity and the identity of these oligonucleotides. t6A (threonylcarbamoyl-N6- adenosine) is a hypermodified nucleoside found at the position 37 (next to the anticodon) in all tRNA decoding ANN codons. It plays an essential role in the fidelity of translation through two main functions: (i) it ensures a correct conformation of the anticodon loop; (ii) it enhances codon/anticodon pairing to prevent frameshifting during translation. This nucleoside is universal, found in Archaea, Bacteria, Eukarya and also in organites such as mitochondria, which suggests that it appeared early in the evolution, probably before the last universal common ancestor (LUCA). Despite the importance of t6A and its distribution, its biosynthetic pathway has remained unknown for almost 40 years.Recently, genetic studies have shown that two universal proteins, Sua5/YrdC and Kae1/YgjD, are both necessary for synthesis of t6A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli. In Bacteria, the in vitro synthesis of t6A requires two other bacterial specific proteins called YeaZ and YjeE. In Archaea and Eukarya, Kae1 (the YgjD orthologue) is a part of a conserved protein complex called KEOPS (for Kinase Endopeptidase and Other Proteins of Small size), with three other proteins Bud32, Cgi121 and Pcc1, that have no bacterial homologues. Since its discovery in 2006 in yeast, this complex has been involved in several cellular processes (telomere homeostasis, genome maintenance, transcription regulation), but its real function remained unclear.Using an in vitro biochemical approach we aimed to characterize and compare the t6A biosynthesis systems from the three domains of life, using as model organisms Pyrococcus abyssi (Archaea) Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Eukarya), and Escherichia coli (Bacteria). We have reconstituted for the first time an in vitro system for t6A modification in Archaea and Eukarya, using purified KEOPS and Sua5. This allowed us to propose a model for the catalytic mechanism, and using in vitro complementation experiments we demonstrated that this mechanism is universal: Sua5/YrdC orthologues are interchangeable, and the KEOPS complex is the functional analogue of the bacterial trio YeaZ/YgjD/YjeE. In the second part of this work we have studied the role of each sub unit in the synthesis of t6A. Using KEOPS from P. abyssi as model we demonstrated that Kae1 is the only catalytic component while the three other partners have distinct functions in dimerization, tRNA binding and allosteric regulation. Finally, we have focused on the t6A synthesis in the mitochondria of S.cerevisiae, and shown that Sua5 and Qri7, the mitochondrial orthologue of Kae1/YgjD, catalyze together the synthesis of t6A and so represent a minimal two-component system.Overall these findings shed light on the reaction mechanism of t6A synthesis in the three domains of life, and allowed proposing a scenario concerning the history of the t6A synthesis machinery and its evolution.PARIS11-SCD-Bib. électronique (914719901) / SudocSudocFranceF