318 research outputs found

    The Physical Properties of LBGs at z>5: Outflows and the "pre-enrichment problem"

    Full text link
    We discuss the properties of Lyman Break galaxies (LBGs) at z>5 as determined from disparate fields covering approximately 500 sq. arcmin. While the broad characteristics of the LBG population has been discussed extensively in the literature, such as luminosity functions and clustering amplitude, we focus on the detailed physical properties of the sources in this large survey (>100 with spectroscopic redshifts). Specifically, we discuss ensemble mass estimates, stellar mass surface densities, core phase space densities, star-formation intensities, characteristics of their stellar populations, etc as obtained from multi-wavelength data (rest-frame UV through optical) for a subsample of these galaxies. In particular, we focus on evidence that these galaxies drive vigorous outflows and speculate that this population may solve the so-called ``pre-enrichment problem''. The general picture that emerges from these studies is that these galaxies, observed about 1 Gyr after the Big Bang, have properties consistent with being the progenitors of the densest stellar systems in the local Universe -- the centers of old bulges and early type galaxies.Comment: 4 pages, to appear in "Pathways Through an Eclectic Universe", J. H. Knappen, T. J. Mahoney, and A. Vazedekis (Eds.), ASP Conf. Ser., 200

    The size-star formation relation of massive galaxies at 1.5<z<2.5

    Full text link
    We study the relation between size and star formation activity in a complete sample of 225 massive (M > 5 x 10^10 Msun) galaxies at 1.5<z<2.5, selected from the FIREWORKS UV-IR catalog of the CDFS. Based on stellar population synthesis model fits to the observed restframe UV-NIR SEDs, and independent MIPS 24 micron observations, 65% of galaxies are actively forming stars, while 35% are quiescent. Using sizes derived from 2D surface brightness profile fits to high resolution (FWHM_{PSF}~0.45 arcsec) groundbased ISAAC data, we confirm and improve the significance of the relation between star formation activity and compactness found in previous studies, using a large, complete mass-limited sample. At z~2, massive quiescent galaxies are significantly smaller than massive star forming galaxies, and a median factor of 0.34+/-0.02 smaller than galaxies of similar mass in the local universe. 13% of the quiescent galaxies are unresolved in the ISAAC data, corresponding to sizes <1 kpc, more than 5 times smaller than galaxies of similar mass locally. The quiescent galaxies span a Kormendy relation which, compared to the relation for local early types, is shifted to smaller sizes and brighter surface brightnesses and is incompatible with passive evolution. The progenitors of the quiescent galaxies, were likely dominated by highly concentrated, intense nuclear star bursts at z~3-4, in contrast to star forming galaxies at z~2 which are extended and dominated by distributed star formation.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in Ap

    Optical Spectroscopy of Distant Red Galaxies

    Full text link
    We present optical spectroscopic follow-up of a sample of Distant Red Galaxies (DRGs) with K 2.3, in the Hubble Deep Field South, the MS 1054-03 field, and the Chandra Deep Field South. Spectroscopic redshifts were obtained for 15 DRGs. Only 2 out of 15 DRGs are located at z < 2, suggesting a high efficiency to select high-redshift sources. From other spectroscopic surveys in the CDFS targeting intermediate to high redshift populations selected with different criteria, we find spectroscopic redshifts for a further 30 DRGs. We use the sample of spectroscopically confirmed DRGs to establish the high quality (scatter in \Delta z/(1+z) of ~ 0.05) of their photometric redshifts in the considered deep fields, as derived with EAZY (Brammer et al. 2008). Combining the spectroscopic and photometric redshifts, we find that 74% of DRGs with K 2. The combined spectroscopic and photometric sample is used to analyze the distinct intrinsic and observed properties of DRGs at z 2. In our photometric sample to K < 22.5, low-redshift DRGs are brighter in K than high-redshift DRGs by 0.7 mag, and more extincted by 1.2 mag in Av. Our analysis shows that the DRG criterion selects galaxies with different properties at different redshifts. Such biases can be largely avoided by selecting galaxies based on their rest-frame properties, which requires very good multi-band photometry and high quality photometric redshifts.Comment: Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal, 13 pages, 8 figures, 5 table

    Spectroscopic Confirmation of Multiple Red Galaxy-Galaxy Mergers in MS1054-03 (z=0.83)

    Full text link
    We present follow-up spectroscopy of the galaxy cluster MS1054-03 (z=0.83) confirming that at least six of the nine merging galaxy pairs identified by van Dokkum et al. (1999) are indeed bound systems: they have projected separations of R_s<10 kpc and relative line-of sight velocities of dv<165 km/s. For the remaining three pairs, we were unable to obtain redshifts of both constituent galaxies. To identify a more objective sample of merging systems, we select bound red galaxy pairs (R_s<=30 kpc, dv<=300 km/s) from our sample of 121 confirmed cluster members: galaxies in bound red pairs make up 15.7+/-3.6% of the cluster population. The (B-K_s) color-magnitude diagram shows that the pair galaxies are as red as the E/S0 members and have a homogeneous stellar population. The red pair galaxies span a large range in luminosity and internal velocity dispersion to include some of the brightest, most massive members (L>L*, sigma>200 km/s); these bound galaxy pairs must evolve into E/S0 members by z~0.7. These results combined with MS1054's high merger fraction and reservoir of likely future mergers indicates that most, if not all, of its early-type members evolved from (passive) galaxy-galaxy mergers at z<~1.Comment: accepted by ApJ Letters; high resolution version of Fig. 2 available at http://www.exp-astro.phys.ethz.ch/tran/outgoing/ms1054mgrs.ps.g

    FIREWORKS U38-to-24 micron photometry of the GOODS-CDFS: multi-wavelength catalog and total IR properties of distant Ks-selected galaxies

    Full text link
    We present a Ks-selected catalog, dubbed FIREWORKS, for the Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS) containing photometry in U_38, B_435, B, V, V_606, R, i_775, I, z_850, J, H, Ks, [3.6 um], [4.5 um], [5.8 um], [8.0 um], and the MIPS [24 um] band. The imaging has a typical Ks limit of 24.3 mag (5 sigma, AB) and coverage over 113 arcmin^2 in all bands and 138 arcmin^2 in all bands but H. We cross-correlate our catalog with the 1 Ms X-ray catalog by Giacconi et al. (2002) and with all available spectroscopic redshifts to date. We find and explain systematic differences in a comparison with the 'z_850 + Ks'-selected GOODS-MUSIC catalog that covers ~90% of the field. We exploit the U38-to-24 micron photometry to determine which Ks-selected galaxies at 1.5<z<2.5 have the brightest total IR luminosities and which galaxies contribute most to the integrated total IR emission. The answer to both questions is that red galaxies are dominating in the IR. This is true no matter whether color is defined in the rest-frame UV, optical, or optical-to-NIR. We do find however that among the reddest galaxies in the rest-frame optical, there is a population of sources with only little mid-IR emission, suggesting a quiescent nature.Comment: Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal, 20 pages, 10 figures, reference to website correcte

    Deep VLT V-band Imaging of the Field of a z=10 Candidate Galaxy: Below the Lyman Limit?

    Full text link
    We present a deep 16.8 ks V-band image of the field of a candidate z=10 galaxy magnified by the foreground (z=0.25) cluster A1835. The image was obtained with FORS1 on VLT-Kueyen to test whether the V-band lies below the Lyman limit for this very high redshift candidate. A detection would unambiguously rule out that the source is at z=10. The 3sigma detection limit of the image in the area of the z=10 candidate is V_AB=28.0 mag in a 2 arcsec diameter aperture (about 3 times the seeing FWHM of 0.7 arcsec). No source at the position of the candidate galaxy is detected down to this limit. Formally, this is consistent with the V-band probing below the Lyman limit in the rest-frame of a z=10 source. However, given the recent non-detection of the object in a deep H-band exposure with NIRI on Gemini North down to H_AB=26.0 mag (3sigma in a 1.4 arcsec aperture) and concerns about the detection of the reported associated emission line, it may be possible that this source is spurious. We discuss several astrophysical possibilities to explain the puzzling nature of this source and find none of them compelling.Comment: accepted for publication in Ap

    An Arc of Young Stars in the Halo of M82

    Full text link
    The properties of the brightest resolved stars in an arc that was originally identified by Sun et al. (2005) and is located in the extraplanar regions of M82 are discussed. The stars form an elongated structure that is traced over a projected area of 3.0 x 0.8 kpc. The integrated brightness is M_V ~ -11, while the total stellar mass is between 3 x 10^5 and 2 x 10^6 solar masses. If there is only foreground extinction then the youngest stars have a metallicity Z > 0.008 and an age log(tyears) ~ 7.75; thus, the youngest stars formed at roughly the same time as stars in tidal features that are associated with other M81 Group galaxies. If the arc is dispersing then it will deposit young, chemically enriched stars into the M82 halo.Comment: 11 pages including 3 postscript figures; accepted for publication in ApJ (Letters

    Archäologie als Empowerment: Für wen und wie? Kommentare zu wissenschaftlichem Aktivismus

    Get PDF
    On the occasion of the 10th anniversary of Forum Kritische Archäologie, the editorial collective reflected on what has been achieved and what we originally imagined for this journal. While we think that the number of contributions with a critical edge that have been published in our journal over the last 10 years is encouraging, and in many ways innovative, there is still a lot to do in one respect: to advance critical discussions in German archaeology itself. German scholarship continues to construct its discourses largely along the line of cultural-historical knowledge, and university teaching is only slowly integrating theoretical or critical perspectives. So we pondered the question of how the development of more critical approaches in German-speaking archaeology could be supported. We decided to ask authors – international and German – to write about political issues, specifically an activist archaeology. The following set of papers is conceptually similar to those in the first volume of our journal, Forum Kritische Archäologie Special Issue: What is a Critical Archaeology? This time, too, we sent authors a set of questions that we asked them to reflect upon in short essays.Anlässlich des 10-jährigen Bestehens des Forum Kritische Archäologie im Jahr 2022 haben wir im Herausgeber* innenkollektiv darüber nachgedacht, was mit dem Forum bisher erreicht wurde und was wir uns ursprünglich für diese Zeitschrift vorgestellt hatten. Während wir die Anzahl der kritischen Beiträge, die in den letzten 10 Jahren in unserer Zeitschrift veröffentlicht wurden, für ermutigend und in vielerlei Hinsicht innovativ halten, haben wir das Gefühl, dass es in einer Hinsicht noch viel zu tun gibt: die kritische Diskussion in der deutschen Archäologie selbst voranzutreiben. Die deutsche Wissenschaft entwickelt ihre Diskurse nach wie vor weitgehend im Rahmen kulturhistorischer Denkansätze, und die universitäre Lehre integriert nur langsam theoretisch fundierte oder kritischere Perspektiven. Wir haben uns daher gefragt, wie die Entwicklung solcher Ansätze in der deutschsprachigen Archäologie unterstützt werden kann, und uns entschieden, Kolleg*innen – internationale wie deutsche – zu bitten, über politische Formen der Archäologie zu schreiben, insbesondere über solche die als aktivistisch verstanden werden können. Die folgenden Beiträge ähneln konzeptionell denen im ersten Band unserer Zeitschrift (Forum Kritische Archäologie 1/Themenheft: Was ist eine kritische Archäologie?). Auch dieses Mal haben wir den Autor*innen eine Reihe von Fragen gestellt und sie gebeten, diese in kurzen Essays zu reflektieren
    • …
    corecore