Quality of provided care in vascular surgery : outcome assessment & improvement strategies

The aim of this thesis was to evaluate the quality of care in vascular surgery in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD): intermittent claudication (IC) and critical lower limb ischaemia (CLI) patients. Therefore firstly it focused on the improvement of the quality of perioperative patient management concerning: (1) a systematic review concerning all quality initiatives in vascular surgery was conducted, (2) an assessed of the implementation of established recommended SP measures in patients with PAOD was established and (3) an evaluation of the implementation of a new optimised care protocol (OCP) outlined in a multidisciplinary meeting was done. Then, it further focused mainly on AEs (registration, occurrence, consequences) of PAOD patients. A (1) determination of risk factors for adverse events (AE) occurrence by assessing three different health care facilities was assessed, (2) an evaluation of the occurrence of cardiac AE after primary lower extremity arterial revascularization (LEAR) for CLI in order to evaluate the impact of cardiac AEs on the clinical outcome was done and (3) a calculation of the average estimated total costs of AEs after treatment for PAOD was performed. Furthermore, the thesis focussed on the quality of life (QOL) of PAOD patients after primary LEAR, concerning (1) the role of social support on the outcome and (2) the improvement of functional status after primary LEAR.Astra Zeneca BV Bard Benelux BV B. Braun Medical BV ChipSoft BV Cordis (Johnson & Johnson) Olympus Nederland BV Terumo BeNelux BVUBL - phd migration 201

Long-term outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Impact of treatment and age

Background: Despite advances in operative repair, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) remains associated with high mortality and morbidity rates, especially in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR), conventional open repair (OPEN), and conservative treatment in elderly patients with rAAA.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all rAAA patients treated with OPEN or eEVAR between January 2005 and December 2011 in the vascular surgery departmen

Quality of provided care in vascular surgery : outcome assessment & improvement strategies

The aim of this thesis was to evaluate the quality of care in vascular surgery in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD): intermittent claudication (IC) and critical lower limb ischaemia (CLI) patients. Therefore firstly it focused on the improvement of the quality of perioperative patient management concerning: (1) a systematic review concerning all quality initiatives in vascular surgery was conducted, (2) an assessed of the implementation of established recommended SP measures in patients with PAOD was established and (3) an evaluation of the implementation of a new optimised care protocol (OCP) outlined in a multidisciplinary meeting was done. Then, it further focused mainly on AEs (registration, occurrence, consequences) of PAOD patients. A (1) determination of risk factors for adverse events (AE) occurrence by assessing three different health care facilities was assessed, (2) an evaluation of the occurrence of cardiac AE after primary lower extremity arterial revascularization (LEAR) for CLI in order to evaluate the impact of cardiac AEs on the clinical outcome was done and (3) a calculation of the average estimated total costs of AEs after treatment for PAOD was performed. Furthermore, the thesis focussed on the quality of life (QOL) of PAOD patients after primary LEAR, concerning (1) the role of social support on the outcome and (2) the improvement of functional status after primary LEAR

Functional status as a prognostic factor for primary revascularization for critical limb ischemia

BACKGROUND Lower extremity arterial revascularization (LEAR) is the gold-standard for critical lower limb ischemia (CLI). The goal of this study was twofold. First, we evaluated the long-term functional status of patients undergoing primary LEAR for CLI. Second, prognostic factors of long-term functional status and survival after primary LEAR for CLI were assessed. METHODS All primary LEAR procedures were analyzed. Patients were stratified by preoperative functional status: ambulatory (group I) vs nonambulatory (group II). Patients were followed-up after 3 and 6 years. Adverse events (AEs) were categorized according to predefined standards: minor, surgical, failed revascularization, and systemic. Associated patient demographic/clinical data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS There were 106 LEAR patients (group I: n = 42, 40% vs group II: n = 64, 60%). Group II patients were significantly older (75 vs 62 years; P = .00), were classified ASA 3-4 more frequently (78% vs 52%; P < .02), had more cardiac disease (n = 42, 66% vs n = 10, 24%; P = .00), renal disease (n = 26, 41% vs n = 7, 17%; P = .00), diabetes (n = 36, 56% vs n = 8, 19%; P = .00), hypertension (n = 47, 73% vs n = 13, 31%; P = .00) and severe CLI (n = 42, 66% vs n = 18, 38%; P < .01). Group II patients had a higher incidence of death (65.6% vs 14.3%; P = .00), minor AEs (n = 38, 26% vs n = 10, 22%; P = .00), surgical AEs (n = 48, 33% vs n = 12, 26%; P < .02) and systemic AEs (n = 24, 86% vs n = 4, 9%; P < .02). Also more unplanned reinterventions occurred in group II (n = 148, 76% vs n = 47, 24%; P = .00). Nonambulatory status was a multivariate independent predictor of nonambulatory status after LEAR during 6 years follow-up (odds ration [OR[: 21.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.76-166.77; P = .00). Pulmonary disease (OR: 7.49; 95% CI: 2.17-25.80; P = .00), not prescribing beta-blockers (OR: 4.67; 95% CI: 1.28-17.03; P < .02), nonambulatory status (OR: 22.99; 95% CI: 6.27-84.24; P = .00), and systemic AEs (OR: 9.66; 95% CI: 1.84-50.57; P < .01) were independent predictors of death. Functional status was not improved in group II after long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION Nonambulatory patients suffer from extensive comorbid conditions. They are accompanied with an increased occurrence of AEs, unplanned reinterventions, and poor long-term survival rates. Successful LEAR did not improve their functional status after 6 years. This emphasizes that attempts for limb salvage must be carefully considered in these patients.Vascular Surger

A Systematic Review of Implementation of Established Recommended Secondary Prevention Measures in Patients with PAOD

AbstractObjectiveSince patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) are at high-risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, preventive measures aimed to reduce cardiovascular adverse events are advocated in the current guidelines. We conducted a systematic review to assess the implementation of secondary prevention (SP) measures in PAOD patients.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched to perform a systematic review of the literature from 1999 till June 2008 on SP for PAOD patients. Assessment of study quality was done following the Cochrane Library review system. The record outcomes were antiplatelet agents, heart rate lowering agents, blood pressure lowering agents, lipid lowering agents, glucose lowering agents, smoking cessation and walking exercise.ResultsFrom a total of 2137 identified studies, 83 observational studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 24 were included in the systematic review comprising 34 157 patients. These patients suffered from coronary artery disease (n=3516, 41%), myocardial infraction (n=2647, 38%), angina pectoris (n=1790, 31%), congestive heart failure (n=2052, 14%), diabetes mellitus (n=10 690, 31%),hypertension (n=20 823, 73%) and hyperlipidaemia (n=15 067, 64%). Contrary to what the guidelines prescribe, antiplatelet agents, heart rate lowering agents, blood pressure lowering agents and lipid lowering agents were prescribed in 63%, 34%, 46% and 45% of the patients, respectively. Glucose lowering agents were prescribed in 81% and smoking cessation in 39% of the patients.ConclusionThe majority of patients suffering from PAOD do not receive the entire approach of SP measures as suggested by the current guidelines. To our knowledge, the cause of this undertreatment is multifactorial: patient, physician or health-care-related

Standard Outpatient Re-Evaluation for Patients Not Admitted to the Hospital After Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Abdominal Pain

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of standard outpatient re-evaluation for patients who are not admitted to the hospital after emergency department surgical consultation for acute abdominal pain. All patients seen at the emergency department between June 2005 and July 2006 for acute abdominal pain were included in a prospective study using a structured diagnosis and management flowchart. Patients not admitted to the hospital were given appointments for re-evaluation at the outpatient clinic within 24 h. All clinical parameters, radiological results, diagnostic considerations, and management proposals were scored prospectively. Five-hundred patients were included in this analysis. For 148 patients (30%), the final diagnosis was different from the diagnosis after initial evaluation. Eighty-five patients (17%) had a change in management after re-evaluation, and 20 of them (4%) were admitted to the hospital for an operation. Only 6 patients (1.2%) had a delay in diagnosis and treatment, which did not cause extra morbidity. Standard outpatient re-evaluation is a safe and effective means of improving diagnostic accuracy and helps to adapt management for patients that are not admitted to the hospital after surgical consultation for acute abdominal pain at the emergency department

Standard Outpatient Re-Evaluation for Patients Not Admitted to the Hospital After Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Abdominal Pain

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of standard outpatient re-evaluation for patients who are not admitted to the hospital after emergency department surgical consultation for acute abdominal pain. All patients seen at the emergency department between June 2005 and July 2006 for acute abdominal pain were included in a prospective study using a structured diagnosis and management flowchart. Patients not admitted to the hospital were given appointments for re-evaluation at the outpatient clinic within 24 h. All clinical parameters, radiological results, diagnostic considerations, and management proposals were scored prospectively. Five-hundred patients were included in this analysis. For 148 patients (30%), the final diagnosis was different from the diagnosis after initial evaluation. Eighty-five patients (17%) had a change in management after re-evaluation, and 20 of them (4%) were admitted to the hospital for an operation. Only 6 patients (1.2%) had a delay in diagnosis and treatment, which did not cause extra morbidity. Standard outpatient re-evaluation is a safe and effective means of improving diagnostic accuracy and helps to adapt management for patients that are not admitted to the hospital after surgical consultation for acute abdominal pain at the emergency department.Vascular Surger

Patient and procedure-related risk factors for adverse events after infrainguinal bypass

Background: Current medical practice urges individual health care facilities and medical professionals to obtain and provide detailed insight in quality of care with the possibility of comparing data between institutions. Adverse event (AE) analysis serves as a mainstay in quality assessment in vascular surgery, but the comparison of A-E data between facilities can be complex. The aim of the present study was to assess independent risk factors for AE occurrence: patient, disease and operation characteristics besides general differences between health care facilities. Methods: All AEs after infrainguinal bypass graft procedures (BGPs) in three health care facilities in the Netherlands were evaluated. AEs were defined identically in the facilities. Results: Of 601 BGPs performed, 662 AEs were registered. Independent predictors of AEs were female gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-3.26; P < .01), age 2:60 years (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3-4 (OR, 1.79; 95%, CI, 1.01-3.17; P = .05), comorbidities of ;pulmonary disease(OB, 2.99;95% CI, 1.67-5.34; P < .01)and diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.49;95% CI, 1.58-3.94; P < .01), distal anastomosis level at below knee femoropopliteal BGP (OF, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.26-3.22; P < .01), femorotibial BGP (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.37-4.19; P < .01), and popliteopedal BGP (OF, 92.39; 95% CI, 11.13-766.98; P < .01). One health care facility had significantly fewer AEs than the other two (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.35; P < .01). Conclusion: Age, gender, comorbidity, and type of surgery are all independent predictors of AE occurrence in vascular surgery. After adjustment for differences in these factors, one health care facility still had lower AE occurrence, which needs to be examined further. (J Vasc Surg 2010;51:622-7.)Analysis and support of clinical decision makin