Supporting self-management of pain by patients with advanced cancer: views of palliative care professionals

Purpose: The aim of the study is to ascertain the views of specialist palliative care professionals on patient selfmanagement of cancer pain in order to inform the development of a new educational intervention to support selfmanagement. Methods: This is a qualitative research study using focus group interviews. Results: Participants viewed self-management of cancer pain as desirable and achievable but also as something that could be problematic. Challenges to self-management were perceived in patient attitudes and behaviours, professionals’ own beliefs and actions and the wider social system. Practitioners: showed awareness of potential tension between their espoused views (the desirability that patients manage pain autonomously) and their tacit views (the undesirability of patients managing pain in ways which conflict with professionals’ knowledge and identity). Conclusions: Practitioners espoused patient-centred professional practice which inclined them towards supporting self-management. They showed awareness of factors which might inhibit them from effectively incorporating education and support for self-management into routine practice

Improving the management of pain from advanced cancer in the community: study protocol for a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Introduction: For patients with advanced cancer, research shows that pain is frequent, burdensome and undertreated. Evidence-based approaches to support cancer pain management have been developed but have not been implemented within the context of the UK National Health Service. This protocol is for a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial to assess feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and cost effectiveness for a multi-component intervention for pain management in patients with advanced cancer. Methods and Analysis: This trial will assess the feasibility of implementation and uptake of evidence based interventions, developed and piloted as part of the IMPACCT Programme grant, into routine clinical practice and determine whether there are potential differences with respect to patient rated pain, patient pain knowledge and experience, healthcare use, quality of life, and cost effectiveness. 160 patients will receive either the intervention (usual care plus supported self-management) delivered within the oncology clinic and palliative care services by locally assigned community palliative care nurses, consisting of a self-management educational intervention and eHealth intervention for routine pain assessment and monitoring; or usual care. The primary outcomes are to assess implementation and uptake of the interventions, and differences in terms of pain severity. Secondary outcomes include pain interference, participant pain knowledge and experience, and cost effectiveness. Outcome assessment will be blinded and patient reported outcome measures collected via post at 6 and 12 weeks following randomisation. Ethics and Dissemination: This RCT has the potential to significantly influence NHS service delivery to community based patients with pain from advanced cancer. We aim to provide definitive evidence of whether two simple interventions delivered by community palliative care nurse in palliative care that support-self-management are clinically and cost effective additions to standard community palliative care