Preemptive use of etodolac on tooth sensitivity after in-office bleaching: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Purpose: This study determined the effectiveness of the preemptive administration of etodolac on risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity and the bleaching effect caused by in-office bleaching using 35% hydrogen peroxide. Material and methods: Fifty patients were selected for this tripleblind, randomized, crossover, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Etodolac (400 mg) or placebo was administrated in a single-dose 1 hour prior to the bleaching procedure. The whitening treatment with 35% hydrogen peroxide was carried out in two sessions with a 7-day interval. Tooth sensitivity was assessed before, during, and 24 hours after the procedure using the analog visual scale and the verbal rating scale. Color alteration was assessed by a bleach guide scale, 7 days after each session. Relative risk of sensitivity was calculated and adjusted by session, while overall risk was compared by the McNemar's test. Data on the sensitivity level of both scales and color shade were subjected to Friedman, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively (α=0.05). Results: The preemptive administration of etodolac did not affect the risk of tooth sensitivity and the level of sensitivity reported, regardless of the time of evaluation and scale used. The sequence of treatment allocation did not affect bleaching effectiveness, while the second session resulted in additional color modification. The preemptive administration of etodolac in a single dose 1 hour prior to in-office tooth bleaching did not alter tooth color, and the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity reported by patients. Conclusion: A single-dose preemptive administration of 400 mg of etodolac did not affect either risk of tooth sensitivity or level of sensitivity reported by patients, during or after the in-office tooth bleaching procedure

Effect of the Polishing Procedures on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Composite Resins

Objectives. To evaluate the polishing procedures effect on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins. Methods. Specimens were distributed into 6 groups: G1: Filtek Supreme XT + PoGo; G2: Filtek Supreme XT + Sof-Lex; G3: Filtek Supreme XT + no polishing; G4: Amelogen + PoGo; G5: Amelogen + Sof-Lex.; G6: Amelogen + no polishing. Initial color values were evaluated using the CIELab scale. After polishing, surface roughness was evaluated and the specimens were stored in coffee solution at 37°C for 7 days. The final color measurement and roughness were determined. Results. Sof-Lex resulted in lower staining. Amelogen showed the highest roughness values than Filtek Supreme on baseline and final evaluations regardless of the polishing technique. Filtek Supreme polished with PoGo showed the lowest roughness values. All groups presented discoloration after storage in coffee solution, regardless of the polishing technique. Conclusion. Multiple-step polishing technique provided lower degree of discoloration for both composite resins. The final surface texture is material and technique dependent

Influence of dental erosion on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded with two different adhesive systems: an in vitro study

This study aimed to analyze the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded with two different adhesive systems to intact and eroded teeth. Ceramic brackets were bonded to 72 bovine central incisors divided into four groups, defined by two study factors: enamel condition (control group, kept in artificial saliva; and experimental group, eroded by using immersion cycles in Coke™ for 90 seconds, every six hours for five days), and adhesive system type (Transbond™ XT or Transbond™ Plus Color Change). Polycrystalline ceramic brackets were adhesively fixed on all specimens using the same light curing protocol. SBS was tested using 0.5 mm/min and the failure mode was classified. SBS data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc pairwise comparison (α=0.05). Percentages of ARI scores between the groups were compared by Fisher’s exact test. Spearman's correlation coefficient was applied to investigate the correlation between ARI scores and SBS values. Only the adhesive system factor had significant effect on SBS (p=0.014), Transbond™ Plus Color Change showing higher values. No significance was found for enamel condition (p=0.665) or the interaction between adhesive system and enamel condition (p=0.055). ARI scores frequencies differed between groups (p<0.001). The median ARI scores were statistically different for most comparisons among the groups. However, no significant correlation was found between ARI scores and SBS. In conclusion, the type of adhesive system affected the SBS of ceramic brackets to dental enamel, but the enamel condition, intact or eroded, had no significant effect. There was no correlation between ARI scores and SBS values, although eroded enamel tended to retain more adhesive after bracket removal

Evaluation of the influence of a surface sealant in the clinical behavior of composite resin class I restorations

A aplicação de selantes de superfície, através da penetração nas irregularidades superficiais e na interface dente/restauração, é realizada ao final do procedimento restaurador e pode minimizar algumas limitações, prolongando a longevidade clínica das restaurações de resina composta. Este estudo clinico randomizado se propôs a avaliar o efeito da aplicação de um selante de superfície no comportamento clínico de restaurações posteriores de resina composta do tipo classe I. Vinte e sete pares de dentes molares ou pré-molares, superiores ou inferiores, que apresentavam lesões de cárie (classe I) ou restaurações de amálgama ou resina composta (classe I) insatisfatórias, que necessitavam de substituição completa, foram aleatorizados e preparados e restaurados com a resina composta Esthet-X. Sobre a superfície da resina de apenas um dente de cada par foi aplicado o selante de superfície Lasting Touch utilizando o modelo experimental de boca dividida. A avaliação única foi realizada empregando-se o método direto USHPS modificado, nos tempos: baseline, 6 meses, 12 meses, por dois operadores. Radiografias interproximais e réplicas das faces oclusais foram obtidas por meio da moldagem com silicona de adição e vazadas com resina epóxica para avaliação qualitativa com Microscópio Eletrônico de Varredura. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste de Mc Nemar (p<0,05). Para a integridade marginal, após 6 meses de avaliação, apenas 1 (4%) restauração do grupo com selante de superfície recebeu o escore Bravo. Aos 12 meses, a integridade marginal apresentou 1 (4%) do grupo sem selante e 2 (7%) restaurações com selante com escore Bravo. Os resultado apresentados nos períodos de avaliação não apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significantes (p=1,0, para todas as condições. Não houve diferença no desempenho clínico de restaurações de resina composta com e sem selante de superfície, sendo aceitáveis após 12 meses de avaliação. As observações em MEV demonstraram que aplicação do selante de superfície promove superfícies mais lisas e regulares para todos os tempos avaliados. Em um período de 12 meses, o selante de superfície mostrou estabilidade na condição avaliada. O Mev, entretanto, não demonstrou superioridade ao grupo sem a aplicação de selante de superfície (controle).The finishing, polishing and surface sealant application, by superficial irregular penetration and between restoration interface, are applied at the end of the restoration and decrease these limitations, and extend the clinical longevity of composite resin restorations. This clinical randomized controled study however aimed to evaluate the effect of the surface sealant application in the clinical behavior of composite posterior resin class I restorations. Twenty seven pairs of upper or lower molars or premolars with carious lesions (class I), and unsatisfactory amalgam or composite resin restorations, which needed total replacement, were randomized and prepared and restored with Esthet X composite resin. The composite resin surface of one tooth from each pair was covered with Lasting Touch surface sealant (Split Mouth Design). The clinical evaluation was made by using the modified direct method USPHS, at the following times: baseline, 6 months and 12 months, by two different operators. Bitewing radiographs and replicas of the occlusal surfaces were obtained by using a silicone impression material poured with epoxy resin for the qualitative evaluation with Scanning Electron Microscopy. The data was analyzed with the McNemar test (p <0.05). Results showed that for the marginal integrity, after 6-month evaluation, only 1 (4%) sealed restoration had a Bravo rating. At the end of 12 months, the marginal integrity showed 1 (4%) sealed restoration and 2 (7%) non sealed Bravo restorations. Results at all evaluations periods did not show statistical significant differences (p=1.0) for all conditions. There was no difference in the clinical performance of the composite resin restorations (Esthet X) with or without the surface sealant (Lasting Touch), demonstrated good behavior after 12 months. Based on SEM examinations, the surface sealant application promoted a regular and smooth surface, for all the evaluation times. In a 12 months evaluations period, the surface sealant demonstrated stability at the evaluated condition. The SEM, however, did not presented better conditions in the no sealant application group (control)

Surface sealant application influence on the resin composite roughness.

Este estudo avaliou, in vitro, a influência da aplicação de quatro selantes de superfície na rugosidade de duas resinas compostas. Cinqüenta espécimes foram confeccionados e divididos em 10 grupos com 5 espécimes cada, em função da combinação entre resina composta e selante de superfície, sendo: G1. Controle Concept; G2. Concept + Fortify; G3. Concept + Biscover; G4. Concept + Lasting Touch; G5. Concept + Fill Glaze; G6. Controle Esthet X; G7. Esthet X + Fortify; G8. Esthet X + Biscover; G9. Esthet X + Lasting Touch; G10. Esthet X + Fill Glaze. Os espécimes foram confeccionados com uma matriz específica, em quatro incrementos, com dimensões internas de 15mmX4mmX5mm, sendo sua polimerização realizada com o aparelho de lâmpada halógena Curing Light 2500 (500mW/cm2) por 20s cada incremento. Em seguida, foram armazenados em água destilada à 37ºC e umidade absoluta de 100% por 24 horas. Após este período, os espécimes foram adaptados em uma Politriz Metalográfica e planificados com lixas de granulometria 320, 600 e a rugosidade inicial foi aferida. Para a mensuração da rugosidade, utilizou-se o rugosímetro Hommel Tester T1000 basic. Numa segunda fase, aplicaram-se os selantes de superfície, conforme recomendações do fabricante, e uma nova aferição da rugosidade superficial foi realizada. Para o teste de abrasão, os espécimes foram submetidos a 100.000 ciclos de escovação, seguido de nova mensuração da rugosidade. Em adição à rugosidade e com o objetivo de avaliar qualitativamente a superfície de alguns espécimes, a leitura em Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura foi empregada. Os resultados foram submetidos aos testes ANOVA a 3 critérios e Tukey para comparações individuais entre os diferentes grupos (p<0,05). A aplicação do selante de superfície diminuiu a rugosidade superficial das resinas compostas testadas (G2=0,0727, G3=0,0147, G4=0,0307, G5=0,0253, G6=0,0960, G7=0,0173, G8=0,0333, G9=0,0480). A abrasão simulada aumentou a rugosidade superficial para todos os grupos, com exceção do Fortify (G2=0,0740, G7=0,0673) e Biscover (G7=0,0440), sendo os maiores valores apresentados pelo Lasting Touch (G4= 0,1253, G9=0,0980), seguido do Fill Glaze (G5=0,0933, G10= 0,0847).This in vitro study evaluated the influence of the application of four surface sealers on the surface roughness of composite resins. Fifty specimens were divided into ten groups according to different patterns of composite resin and surface sealers, as follows: G1. Control with Concept resin; G2. Concept + Fortify; G3. Concept + Biscover; G4. Concept + Lasting Touch; G5. Concept + Fill Glaze; G6. Control with Esthet X; G7. Esthet X + Fortify; G8. Esthet X + Biscover; G9. Esthet X + Lasting Touch; G10. Esthet X + Fill Glaze. Specimens were made in four increments using a stainless steel matrix of 15x5x4mm and resin increments were polymerized with halogen lamp Curing Light 2500 (500mW/cm2) for 20 seconds each. After complete polymerization, specimens were stored in 100% humidity in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours. Following storage, specimens were polished using ascending grades (320, 600) of abrasive SiC paper under running water and the initial roughness was measured with a perfilometer Hommel Tester T100 basic (Hommelwerke GmbH ref. # 240851 - Schwenningem - Germany). Surface sealers were applied following the manufacturer\'s instructions and a new measurement of roughness was made. For the abrasive resistance test, specimens were submitted to 100.000 cycles of abrasive dentifrice brushing followed by surface roughness.. Qualitative analisys was made by using MEV. Results were submitted to Three-way ANOVA (p<0,05) and Tuckey\'s test to individual comparisons between different groups. Surface sealant application provided smoother surfaces for of composite resins tested (G2=0.0727, G3=0.0147, G4=0.0307, G5=0.0253, G6=0.0960, G7=0.0173, G8=0.0333, G9=0.0480). The abrasion test increased the surface roughness for all tested groups, except Fortify (G2=0,0740, G7=0,0673) and Biscover (G7=0,0440). Lasting Touch presented rougher surfaces (G4= 0,1253, G9=0,0980), followed by Fill Glaze (G5=0,0933, G10= 0,0847)

Evaluation of the influence of a surface sealant in the clinical behavior of composite resin class I restorations

A aplicação de selantes de superfície, através da penetração nas irregularidades superficiais e na interface dente/restauração, é realizada ao final do procedimento restaurador e pode minimizar algumas limitações, prolongando a longevidade clínica das restaurações de resina composta. Este estudo clinico randomizado se propôs a avaliar o efeito da aplicação de um selante de superfície no comportamento clínico de restaurações posteriores de resina composta do tipo classe I. Vinte e sete pares de dentes molares ou pré-molares, superiores ou inferiores, que apresentavam lesões de cárie (classe I) ou restaurações de amálgama ou resina composta (classe I) insatisfatórias, que necessitavam de substituição completa, foram aleatorizados e preparados e restaurados com a resina composta Esthet-X. Sobre a superfície da resina de apenas um dente de cada par foi aplicado o selante de superfície Lasting Touch utilizando o modelo experimental de boca dividida. A avaliação única foi realizada empregando-se o método direto USHPS modificado, nos tempos: baseline, 6 meses, 12 meses, por dois operadores. Radiografias interproximais e réplicas das faces oclusais foram obtidas por meio da moldagem com silicona de adição e vazadas com resina epóxica para avaliação qualitativa com Microscópio Eletrônico de Varredura. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste de Mc Nemar (p<0,05). Para a integridade marginal, após 6 meses de avaliação, apenas 1 (4%) restauração do grupo com selante de superfície recebeu o escore Bravo. Aos 12 meses, a integridade marginal apresentou 1 (4%) do grupo sem selante e 2 (7%) restaurações com selante com escore Bravo. Os resultado apresentados nos períodos de avaliação não apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significantes (p=1,0, para todas as condições. Não houve diferença no desempenho clínico de restaurações de resina composta com e sem selante de superfície, sendo aceitáveis após 12 meses de avaliação. As observações em MEV demonstraram que aplicação do selante de superfície promove superfícies mais lisas e regulares para todos os tempos avaliados. Em um período de 12 meses, o selante de superfície mostrou estabilidade na condição avaliada. O Mev, entretanto, não demonstrou superioridade ao grupo sem a aplicação de selante de superfície (controle).The finishing, polishing and surface sealant application, by superficial irregular penetration and between restoration interface, are applied at the end of the restoration and decrease these limitations, and extend the clinical longevity of composite resin restorations. This clinical randomized controled study however aimed to evaluate the effect of the surface sealant application in the clinical behavior of composite posterior resin class I restorations. Twenty seven pairs of upper or lower molars or premolars with carious lesions (class I), and unsatisfactory amalgam or composite resin restorations, which needed total replacement, were randomized and prepared and restored with Esthet X composite resin. The composite resin surface of one tooth from each pair was covered with Lasting Touch surface sealant (Split Mouth Design). The clinical evaluation was made by using the modified direct method USPHS, at the following times: baseline, 6 months and 12 months, by two different operators. Bitewing radiographs and replicas of the occlusal surfaces were obtained by using a silicone impression material poured with epoxy resin for the qualitative evaluation with Scanning Electron Microscopy. The data was analyzed with the McNemar test (p <0.05). Results showed that for the marginal integrity, after 6-month evaluation, only 1 (4%) sealed restoration had a Bravo rating. At the end of 12 months, the marginal integrity showed 1 (4%) sealed restoration and 2 (7%) non sealed Bravo restorations. Results at all evaluations periods did not show statistical significant differences (p=1.0) for all conditions. There was no difference in the clinical performance of the composite resin restorations (Esthet X) with or without the surface sealant (Lasting Touch), demonstrated good behavior after 12 months. Based on SEM examinations, the surface sealant application promoted a regular and smooth surface, for all the evaluation times. In a 12 months evaluations period, the surface sealant demonstrated stability at the evaluated condition. The SEM, however, did not presented better conditions in the no sealant application group (control)

Preemptive use of etodolac on tooth sensitivity after in-office bleaching: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Purpose: This study determined the effectiveness of the preemptive administration of etodolac on risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity and the bleaching effect caused by in-office bleaching using 35% hydrogen peroxide. Material and methods: Fifty patients were selected for this tripleblind, randomized, crossover, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Etodolac (400 mg) or placebo was administrated in a single-dose 1 hour prior to the bleaching procedure. The whitening treatment with 35% hydrogen peroxide was carried out in two sessions with a 7-day interval. Tooth sensitivity was assessed before, during, and 24 hours after the procedure using the analog visual scale and the verbal rating scale. Color alteration was assessed by a bleach guide scale, 7 days after each session. Relative risk of sensitivity was calculated and adjusted by session, while overall risk was compared by the McNemar's test. Data on the sensitivity level of both scales and color shade were subjected to Friedman, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively (α=0.05). Results: The preemptive administration of etodolac did not affect the risk of tooth sensitivity and the level of sensitivity reported, regardless of the time of evaluation and scale used. The sequence of treatment allocation did not affect bleaching effectiveness, while the second session resulted in additional color modification. The preemptive administration of etodolac in a single dose 1 hour prior to in-office tooth bleaching did not alter tooth color, and the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity reported by patients. Conclusion: A single-dose preemptive administration of 400 mg of etodolac did not affect either risk of tooth sensitivity or level of sensitivity reported by patients, during or after the in-office tooth bleaching procedure

Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel

Abstract Objective: To assess the short-term effect of two in vitro erosive challenge protocols on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets on bovine enamel. Methods: Sixty bovine incisors were selected and randomly divided into six groups: AS7 (artificial saliva - 7 days, Control Group); CC7 (Coca-Cola™ - 7 days); LJ7 (lime juice - 7 days); AS30 (artificial saliva - 30 days, Control Group); CC30 (Coca-Cola™ - 30 days); LJ30 (lime juice - 30 days). Microhardness testing was performed prior to the erosive challenge to verify the standardization of samples. Immersion was performed 4x/day for five minutes, for either 7 or 30 days. After immersions were concluded, the brackets were bonded and shear bond strength was assessed after 48 hours. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was also assessed. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc and Student’s t test for paired samples, and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test (α = 5%). Results: The mean and standard deviation of microhardness testing of total samples were 281.89 ± 44.51 KHN. There was no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength for the time factor (7 or 30 days; F5.54= 0.105; p = 0.901). However, there was a statistically significant difference for the solution factor (F5.54= 6.671; p = 0.003). These differences occurred among solutions of Saliva x Coca-Cola™ (p = 0.003) and Coca-Cola™ x Lime Juice (p= 0.029). The assessment of the Adhesive Remnant Index showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: The immersion time used in the erosion protocols did not affect the bond strength of brackets to teeth. Coca-Cola™ induced significantly higher shear bond strength values than lime juice and artificial saliva. However, the short term effects of 7/30 days in this in vitro study may not be extrapolated for in vivo ones. Clinical studies should be conducted, substantiating the laboratory results