Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield

We suggest an innovative approach to literary discourse by using corpus linguistic methods to address research questions from cognitive poetics. In this article, we focus on the way that readers engage in mind-modelling in the process of characterisation. The article sets out our cognitive poetic model of characterisation that emphasises the continuity between literary characterisation and real-life human relationships. The model also aims to deal with the modelling of the author’s mind in line with the modelling of the minds of fictional characters. Crucially, our approach to mind-modelling is text-driven. Therefore we are able to employ corpus linguistic techniques systematically to identify textual patterns that function as cues triggering character information. In this article, we explore our understanding of mind-modelling through the characterisation of Mr. Dick from David Copperfield by Charles Dickens. Using the CLiC tool (Corpus Linguistics in Cheshire) developed for the exploration of 19th-century fiction, we investigate the textual traces in non-quotations around this character, in order to draw out the techniques of characterisation other than speech presentation. We show that Mr. Dick is a thematically and authorially significant character in the novel, and we move towards a rigorous account of the reader’s modelling of authorial intention

Business Ethics: The Promise of Neuroscience

Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience research portend well for furthering understanding of many of the fundamental questions in the field of business ethics, both normative and empirical. This article provides an overview of neuroscience methodology and brain structures, and explores the areas in which neuroscience research has contributed findings of value to business ethics, as well as suggesting areas for future research. Neuroscience research is especially capable of providing insight into individual reactions to ethical issues, while also raising challenging normative questions about the nature of moral responsibility, autonomy, intent, and free will. This article also provides a brief summary of the papers included in this special issue, attesting to the richness of scholarly inquiry linking neuroscience and business ethics. We conclude that neuroscience offers considerable promise to the field of business ethics, but we caution against overpromise

The year’s work in stylistics 2009

At a recent conference on the linguistics of English (ISLE, Freiburg, 2008) I was surprised by the number of talks on topics that for me were clearly related to stylistics. My surprise was not that stylistics papers should be so prevalent at a linguistics conference but that the presenters of these papers seemed not to consider their work as primarily stylistic in nature. Most positioned themselves as historical linguists or sociolinguists and presented their work as contributions to historical linguistics and sociolinguistics respectively, despite the fact that all of them were concerned with aspects of style. Along with a number of PALA colleagues, I gave a paper in a dedicated stylistics strand, though in retrospect it now seems that it would perhaps have been more valuable to have integrated our explicitly stylistic papers into the conference generally; after all, the interest in stylistics was clearly there, even if it was not designated as such