Advances in management of primary myelofibrosis and polycythaemia vera: Implications in clinical practice

Abstract Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and polycythaemia vera (PV) are rare BCR‐ABL1‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, haemorrhagic complications and progression to fibrosis or leukaemia or fibrosis for PV. Both diseases are characterised by biological and clinical heterogeneity, leading to great variability in their management in routine clinical practice. In this review, we present an updated overview of the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of PMF and PV, and we discuss how our multidisciplinary expert group based across France translates this evidence‐based knowledge into routine clinical practice

Elderly Patients (Age 70 Years or Older) With Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Acute Myeloid Leukemia Developed Concurrently to Another Malignant Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) remains a therapeutic challenge. In elderly patients with AML, it is unclear whether sAML displays an inferior outcome compared with de novo AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied AML with an antecedent of hematologic disease, treatment-related AML, or AML occurring concurrently to another malignancy in a single-center cohort of patients aged 70 and older with AML. The study included 169 patients who were compared with a cohort of patients with de novo AML, without any prior history of malignant disorders, seen during the same period of time. RESULTS: Hematologic antecedents or presence of prior/concurrent solid malignancy did not impact complete remission rates and overall survival. In multivariate analysis, sAML appeared without independent prognostic value in the elderly. CONCLUSION: Our results support that sAML and de novo AML in elderly patients are not prognostically distinct entities. They should therefore not be considered separately when investigating outcomes and new treatment strategies

Class I/Class II HLA Evolutionary Divergence Ratio Is an Independent Marker Associated With Disease-Free and Overall Survival After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

International audienceClass I Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) evolutionary divergence (HED) is a metric which reflects immunopeptidome diversity and has been associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor responses in solid tumors. Its impact and interest in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) have not yet been thoroughly studied. This study analyzed the clinical and immune impact of class I and II HED in 492 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) recipients undergoing HCT. The overall cohort was divided into a training (n=338) and a testing (n=132) set. Univariate cox screening found a positive impact of a high class I HED and a negative impact of a high class II HED on both disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). These results were combined in a unique marker, class I/class II HED ratio, and assessed in the testing cohort. The final multivariate cox model confirmed the positive impact of a high versus low class I/class II HED ratio on both DFS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.41 [95% CI 0.2-0.83]; p=0.01) and OS (HR 0.34 [0.19-0.59]; p<0.001), independently of HLA matching and other HCT parameters. No significant association was found between the ratio and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) nor with neutrophil and platelet recovery. A high class I HED was associated with a tendency for an increase in NK, CD8 T-cell, and B cell recovery at 12 months. These results introduce HED as an original and independent prognosis marker reflecting immunopeptidome diversity and alloreactivity after HCT

Prognostic Value of Genetic Alterations in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single Institution Experience

Although the outcome in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has improved, the benefit associated with standard intensive chemotherapy in older patients remains debatable. In this study, we investigated the incidence and the prognostic significance of genetic characteristics according to treatment intensity in patients aged 60 years or older. On the 495 patients of our cohort, DNMT3A R882 (25.2%), NPM1 (23.7%) and FLT3-ITD (16.8%) were the most frequent molecular mutations found at diagnosis. In this elderly population, intensive chemotherapy seemed to be a suitable option in terms of early death and survival, except for normal karyotype (NK) NPM1−FLT3-ITD+ patients and those aged over 70 within the adverse cytogenetic/molecular risk group. The FLT3-ITD mutation was systematically associated with an unfavorable outcome, independently of the ratio. NK NPM1+/FLT3-TKD+ genotype tends to confer a good prognosis in patients treated intensively. Regarding minimal residual disease prognostic value, overall survival was significantly better for patients achieving a 4 log NPM1 reduction (median OS: 24.4 vs. 12.8 months, p = 0.013) but did not reach statistical significance for progression free survival. This retrospective study highlights that intensive chemotherapy may not be the most appropriate option for each elderly patient and that molecular markers may help treatment intensity decision-making