Cost minimization analysis of different growth hormone pen devices based on time-and-motion simulations

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Numerous pen devices are available to administer recombinant Human Growth Hormone (rhGH), and both patients and health plans have varying issues to consider when selecting a particular product and device for daily use. Therefore, the present study utilized multi-dimensional product analysis to assess potential time involvement, required weekly administration steps, and utilization costs relative to daily rhGH administration.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Study objectives were to conduct 1) Time-and-Motion (TM) simulations in a randomized block design that allowed time and steps comparisons related to rhGH preparation, administration and storage, and 2) a Cost Minimization Analysis (CMA) relative to opportunity and supply costs. Nurses naïve to rhGH administration and devices were recruited to evaluate four rhGH pen devices (2 in liquid form, 2 requiring reconstitution) via TM simulations. Five videotaped and timed trials for each product were evaluated based on: 1) Learning (initial use instructions), 2) Preparation (arrange device for use), 3) Administration (actual simulation manikin injection), and 4) Storage (maintain product viability between doses), in addition to assessment of steps required for weekly use. The CMA applied micro-costing techniques related to opportunity costs for caregivers (categorized as wages), non-drug medical supplies, and drug product costs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Norditropin^®NordiFlex and Norditropin^®NordiPen (NNF and NNP, Novo Nordisk, Inc., Bagsværd, Denmark) took less weekly Total Time (p < 0.05) to use than either of the comparator products, Genotropin^®Pen (GTP, Pfizer, Inc, New York, New York) or HumatroPen^®(HTP, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana). Time savings were directly related to differences in new package Preparation times (NNF (1.35 minutes), NNP (2.48 minutes) GTP (4.11 minutes), HTP (8.64 minutes), p < 0.05)). Administration and Storage times were not statistically different. NNF (15.8 minutes) and NNP (16.2 minutes) also took less time to Learn than HTP (24.0 minutes) and GTP (26.0 minutes), p < 0.05). The number of weekly required administration steps was also least with NNF and NNP. Opportunity cost savings were greater in devices that were easier to prepare for use; GTP represented an 11.8% drug product savings over NNF, NNP and HTP at time of study. Overall supply costs represented <1% of drug costs for all devices.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Time-and-motion simulation data used to support a micro-cost analysis demonstrated that the pen device with the greater time demand has highest net costs.</p

Styles of adaptation in autoimmune thyroiditis and bipolar disorder: a pilot study

A growing body of evidence suggests that styles of adaptation, assessed with the Serial Color-Word Test (S-CWT, a 5-trials Stroop task), are able to differentiate several mental and psychosomatic disorders. Recent findings have confirmed a very high rate of cases of autoimmune thyroiditis (so called Hashimoto disease) among bipolar patients, suggesting an etio-pathogenetic relatedness between the two ailments. Based on the latter relatedness, it was hypothesized that the same styles of adaptation, which are known to differentiate bipolar and control subjects are also characteristic of patients with autoimmune thyroiditis

Assessment of the awareness and management of sleep apnea syndrome in acromegaly. The COM.E.TA (Comorbidities Evaluation and Treatment in Acromegaly) Italian Study Group

In 2007 the Italian COM.E.T.A. (COMorbidities Evaluation and Treatment in Acromegaly) study group started to assess the application in a clinical setting of the Versailles criteria for management of acromegaly complications by a first questionnaire focusing on cardiovascular co-morbidities. A further questionnaire on sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) was delivered by the COM.E.T.A. study group to 107 endocrine centers in Italy. The results of our survey suggest that SAS is a well-known comorbidity even if its estimated prevalence is lower than in the literature. Polysomnography is the preferred tool for diagnosis. Control of SAS is considered relevant both for quality of life and co-morbidities. Continuous positive airway pressure is the cornerstone of therapy, but patients' acceptance may be critical. Control of GH/IGF-I secretion is important to improve SAS. Management of SAS requires cooperation between specialists. \ua92011, Editrice Kurtis

Assessment of the awareness and management of sleep apnea syndrome in acromegaly. The COM.E.TA (Comorbidities Evaluation and Treatment in Acromegaly) Italian Study Group.

In 2007 the Italian COM.E.T.A. (COMorbidities Evaluation and Treatment in Acromegaly) study group started to assess the application in a clinical setting of the Versailles criteria for management of acromegaly complications by a first questionnaire focusing on cardiovascular co-morbidities. A further questionnaire on sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) was delivered by the COM.E.T.A. study group to 107 endocrine centers in Italy. The results of our survey suggest that SAS is a well-known comorbidity even if its estimated prevalence is lower than in the literature. Polysomnography is the preferred tool for diagnosis. Control of SAS is considered relevant both for quality of life and co-morbidities. Continuous positive airway pressure is the cornerstone of therapy, but patients' acceptance may be critical. Control of GH/IGF-I secretion is important to improve SAS. Management of SAS requires cooperation between specialists. ©2011, Editrice Kurtis

Assessment of the awareness and management of cardiovascular complications of acromegaly in Italy. The COM.E.T.A. (COMorbidities Evaluation and Treatment in Acromegaly) study

Background: During the course of acromegaly, cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic co-morbidities contribute to enhanced mortality. In 2002, the Pituitary Society and the European Neuroendocrine Association sponsored a Consensus Workshop in Versailles during which guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of co-morbidities in acromegaly were defined. However, as for other guidelines previously issued in the field, no data are available on their clinical application. Aim: The aim of this work coordinated by the Italian Study group on co-morbidities evaluation and treatment in acromegaly (COM.E.T.A.) was to assess, on a national basis, the application in the clinical practice of the Versailles criteria for diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular comorbities in acromegaly. Materials and methods: In January 2007 an ad hoc designed questionnaire was sent by mail to 130 endocrine Centers in Italy. Results: The guidelines have been generally well perceived and translated in clinical practice. Specifically: 1) echocardiography is considered the mainstay for the diagnosis and follow-up; 2) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood lipid assessment are performed in most hypertensive patients; 3) most endocrinologists directly manage hypertension and are aware of the uncertainty of the effect of the control of the disease on blood pressure levels; 4) ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptors blockers are first-choice anti-hypertensive treatment; 5) approximately half of the centers consider somatostatin analogues of paramount relevance for biochemical control of disease; 6) awareness that left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure are the most relevant cardiovascular complications is high although the impact of ischemic, arrhythmic, and valvular complications on prognosis is less well perceived. Conclusion: The results of the present survey suggest that previuosly issued guidelines are generally carefully followed in the clinical practice. On the other side, a certain lack of awareness of emerging aspects of the cardiovascular comorbities of acromegaly confirms the necessity of periodically updating the guidelines based on the availability of new clinical information. ©2008, Editrice Kurtis