Age-adapted induction treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly and assessment of maintenance with interferon combined with chemotherapy : A multicentric prospective study in forty patients

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the elderly is characterized by its poor prognosis. Forty patients with ALL, aged 55 years or older, and with good performance status (ECOG <3) were prospectively treated according to an age-adapted regimen: induction therapy was derived from the LALA87 protocol while the feasibility of treatment with interferon combined with chemotherapy was assessed during maintenance. Compared with younger adults treated according to the LALA87 protocol, elderly patients did not present with more adverse prognostic features, except for a lower incidence of T cell ALL (9 vs 31%, P = 0.005). There were even less patients with a high leukocyte count (15 vs 38%, P = 0.003), a characteristic associated with adverse prognosis while the incidence of Philadelphia-positive (Ph-positive) ALL was not significantly increased compared to younger adults (31 vs 20%, P = 0.2). After completion of induction therapy, with or without salvage treatment, 85% (CI: 70-94%) obtained a complete response (CR) while treatment-related mortality during induction was 7.5% (CI: 2-20%). Median overall survival and disease-free survival were 14.3 months and 14 months, respectively, which, although inferior to results achieved in younger adults, compares favorably with available data in the elderly. Treatment with IFN proved feasible in most patients but had to be discontinued in eight patients because of toxicity. Age-adapted treatment improves the prognosis of ALL in the elderly even if, in most cases, a cure cannot be achieved

Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly: An evaluation of interferon alpha given as a single agent after complete remission

Although interferon (IFN) has been used in elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the benefits from IFN therapy have not been properly assessed, especially as it was given combined with other cytotoxic drugs, which obscured the role of IFN if any. In 1997, we started a study aimed at improving our previous results in elderly patients with ALL and at assessing the therapeutic role of IFN in this disease. Fifty-eight patients with ALL, aged 55-81 years (median: 64.9 years), were randomly allocated to treatment with vindesine or vincristine during induction. After a first consolidation course, IFN was administered as a single agent for three months together with cranial radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was then resumed with a second consolidation course and maintenance. A complete remission (CR) was obtained in 58% of patients (CI: 45-71%), significantly less than in our previous study which included IFN combined with chemotherapy during maintenance (CR: 85%, CI:70-94%, p = 0.007). Overall survival (median: 289 vs 434 days in the previous study, p = 0.01) and disease-free survival (median: 146 vs 427 days, p = 0.009) were also inferior in the present study. In particular, the pattern of relapses over time suggested that the 3 month IFN treatment phase with no additional chemotherapy might have contributed to the comparatively poor outcome of this cohort. In addition, vindesine given during induction did not prove less neurotoxic than vincristine, did not improve the CR rate, and had no impact on survival. In conclusion, although similar to published studies in elderly patients with ALL, this study is inferior to our previous one. INF, given as a single drug, has a modest role if any in the treatment of older persons with ALL