ESR spectra of PF_2 and SF_3 radicals

[No abstract

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Hyeprfine Structure

Contains research objectives and reports on four research projects

Development of beam position monitors for heavy ion recirculators

Work is underway at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to design and build a small-scale, heavy ion recirculating induction accelerator. An essential part of this design work is the development of small nonintercepting diagnostics to measure beam current and position. This paper describes some of this work, with particular emphasis on the development of a small capacitive probe beam position monitor to resolve beam position to the 100 {mu}m level in a 6 cm diameter beam pipe. Initial measured results with an 80 keV potassium ion beam are presented

Plasma Electronics

Contains reports on ten research projects.U. S. Air Force under Contract AF 19(628)-500U. S. Atomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)-3211U. S. Atomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)-3221National Science Foundation (Grant G-24073)Lincoln Laboratory, Purchase Order DDL BB-10

Plasma Electronics

Contains reports on seventeen research projects.National Science Foundation (Grant GK-57)United States Atomic Energy Commission (Contract AT(30-1)-3285)United States Atomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)-322

Plasma Electronics

Contains reports on twelve research projects.United States Atomic Energy Commission (Contract AT(30-1)-3285)United States Atomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)-3221National Science Foundation (Grant GK-57

Plasma Dynamics

Contains reports on three research projects.United States Atomic Energy Commission (Contract AT(30-1)-1842)United States Air Force, Air Force Cambridge Research Center, Air Research and Development Command (Contract AF19(604)-5992)National Science Foundation (Grant G-9330)Flight Accessories Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WADD Contract AF33(616)-3984

Plasma Electronics

Contains research objectives and reports on six research objectives.National Science Foundation (Grant G-24073)Lincoln Laboratory, Purchase Order DDL BB-107U. S. Air Force under Contract AF 19(628)-50

Plasma Electronics

Contains research objectives and reports on ten research projects.National Science Foundation (Grant GK-57)United States Atomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)-322

Interdependent Infrastructure as Linked Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETSs) to Address Lock‐in and Enhance Resilience

Traditional infrastructure adaptation to extreme weather events (and now climate change) has typically been techno‐centric and heavily grounded in robustness—the capacity to prevent or minimize disruptions via a risk‐based approach that emphasizes control, armoring, and strengthening (e.g., raising the height of levees). However, climate and nonclimate challenges facing infrastructure are not purely technological. Ecological and social systems also warrant consideration to manage issues of overconfidence, inflexibility, interdependence, and resource utilization—among others. As a result, techno‐centric adaptation strategies can result in unwanted tradeoffs, unintended consequences, and underaddressed vulnerabilities. Techno‐centric strategies that lock‐in today\u27s infrastructure systems to vulnerable future design, management, and regulatory practices may be particularly problematic by exacerbating these ecological and social issues rather than ameliorating them. Given these challenges, we develop a conceptual model and infrastructure adaptation case studies to argue the following: (1) infrastructure systems are not simply technological and should be understood as complex and interconnected social, ecological, and technological systems (SETSs); (2) infrastructure challenges, like lock‐in, stem from SETS interactions that are often overlooked and underappreciated; (3) framing infrastructure with a SETS lens can help identify and prevent maladaptive issues like lock‐in; and (4) a SETS lens can also highlight effective infrastructure adaptation strategies that may not traditionally be considered. Ultimately, we find that treating infrastructure as SETS shows promise for increasing the adaptive capacity of infrastructure systems by highlighting how lock‐in and vulnerabilities evolve and how multidisciplinary strategies can be deployed to address these challenges by broadening the options for adaptation