21 research outputs found

    An mHealth tool for community health workers to improve caregiver knowledge of child health in the Amazon: An effectiveness-implementation hybrid evaluation

    Get PDF
    When community health workers (CHWs) are effective, they can teach healthy child rearing practices in their communities and improve child health and development outcomes. An effective mHealth tool can improve the capacity of CHWs to transmit knowledge to caregivers. This article evaluates the implementation of an mHealth tool in a CHW program in the Amazon of Peru. The intervention was designed, implemented, and evaluated with the guidance of multiple implementation science tools. A Hybrid Type 3 evaluation design was used to test the effectiveness of the implementation strategies and appropriateness of the intervention. The implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, dosage, and fidelity were analyzed with mixed methods approach to determine if the intervention was successfully installed in the CHW program. The service outcome, knowledge scores, was analyzed with an independent samples t-test and one way ANOVA to determine the effect of the program. The implementation strategies resulted in high degrees of acceptability, adoption, and fidelity of the mHealth tool. The surveillance component of the mHealth tools was not adequately adopted. The group of caregivers that received home visits with the mHealth tool (N = 48) had significantly higher knowledge scores (+1.26 standard deviations) than those in the control group (N = 138) (t(184) = -4.39, p<0.001). The COVID-19 pandemic significantly decreased the dosage of the intervention received by the participants. The CHEST App intervention is a promising tool to improve the capacity of CHWs during their home visits. Trial registered with ISRCTN on 11/29/2018 at https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN43591826

    CONSORT flow diagram.

    No full text
    (TIF)</p

    Tukey Post hoc comparison of groups on knowledge scores.

    No full text
    Tukey Post hoc comparison of groups on knowledge scores.</p

    Independent t-test analysis results to compare group means of knowledge scores.

    No full text
    Independent t-test analysis results to compare group means of knowledge scores.</p

    One-way ANOVA results to compare group means of knowledge scores.

    No full text
    One-way ANOVA results to compare group means of knowledge scores.</p

    Mean knowledge scores.

    No full text
    Mean knowledge scores.</p

    SPIRIT checklist reporting guideline.

    No full text
    (TIF)</p

    Trial protocol.

    No full text
    (TIF)</p

    Conceptual model of intervention.

    No full text
    (TIFF)</p
    corecore