Clonidina en el tratamiento de la deshabituación tabáquica. Comparación con chicles de nicotina

The objective of our work was to carry out a prospective study on the effectiveness of clonidine and nicotine gum in the treatment of tobacco withdrawal. Sixty smokers were randomly distributed in two groups and were included in a tobacco withdrawal program. One group received oral clonidine treatment while the other group was given nicotine gum. Adjuvant therapy such as group therapy or psychotherapy was not performed. At the end of one year there were no significant differences between the two groups with regards to the number of subjects who have continued to stop smoking. There were also no significant differences between the two groups with regards to the symptoms of tobacco abstinence. When we studied the relation between treatment fulfillment and tobacco withdrawal we observed that the clonidine treated group had a significantly greater number of success compared to the nicotine group (p < 0.01)

New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias

Characterization of the genetic landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (ADD) provides a unique opportunity for a better understanding of the associated pathophysiological processes. We performed a two-stage genome-wide association study totaling 111,326 clinically diagnosed/'proxy' AD cases and 677,663 controls. We found 75 risk loci, of which 42 were new at the time of analysis. Pathway enrichment analyses confirmed the involvement of amyloid/tau pathways and highlighted microglia implication. Gene prioritization in the new loci identified 31 genes that were suggestive of new genetically associated processes, including the tumor necrosis factor alpha pathway through the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex. We also built a new genetic risk score associated with the risk of future AD/dementia or progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD/dementia. The improvement in prediction led to a 1.6- to 1.9-fold increase in AD risk from the lowest to the highest decile, in addition to effects of age and the APOE ε4 allele

Clonidina en el tratamiento de la deshabituación tabáquica. Comparación con chicles de nicotina

The objective of our work was to carry out a prospective study on the effectiveness of clonidine and nicotine gum in the treatment of tobacco withdrawal. Sixty smokers were randomly distributed in two groups and were included in a tobacco withdrawal program. One group received oral clonidine treatment while the other group was given nicotine gum. Adjuvant therapy such as group therapy or psychotherapy was not performed. At the end of one year there were no significant differences between the two groups with regards to the number of subjects who have continued to stop smoking. There were also no significant differences between the two groups with regards to the symptoms of tobacco abstinence. When we studied the relation between treatment fulfillment and tobacco withdrawal we observed that the clonidine treated group had a significantly greater number of success compared to the nicotine group (p < 0.01)

Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert(®)) versus topical drops

AIM: To compare the mydriatic efficacy of an ophthalmic insert (Mydriasert, MY) versus phenylephrine and tropicamide (PT) eye drops. METHODS: Two controlled, prospective, randomized, single-blind studies were performed. In the first study, a total of 80 eyes from 40 outpatient-clinic patients were analyzed. PT drops were applied to the right eye, and a MY device was inserted in the left eye for 30min. Time until maximal pupil dilation for each eye was then assessed. In the second study, 80 eyes from 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery were analyzed. Pupil dilation was achieved using either PT drops three-times for one hour prior to surgery (40 patients), or a MY device was inserted one hour prior to surgery (40 patients). RESULTS: In the first study, MY achieved superior mydriasis compared to PT eye drops at 90min (9.04 +/- 1.33mm vs 8.78 +/- 1.37mm, P=0.012). However MY took longer than PT drops to achieve maximal dilation, and mydriasis was inferior in eyes with MY compared to PT drops at 30min (7.21 +/- 1.73mm vs8.22 +/- 1.43mm, P < 0.001), the two groups only becoming similar by 60min (8.85 +/- 1.44mm vs8.71 +/- 1.27mm, P=0.236). In the second study, both MY and PT achieved similar levels of mydriasis at the beginning of surgery (8.75 +/- 0.76mm with MY vs8.77 +/- 0.63mm with PT), and also at the end of surgery (7.96 +/- 1.06mm with MY vs 8.32 +/- 0.72mm with PT), with no significant difference between groups (P=0.08). MY was well tolerated and cardiovascular effects were not influenced by dilation method. CONLUSION: MY could be a safe and efficacious alternative for mydriasis. The mydriatic effect of MY is as good as conventional PT eye drops after 60min, and is superior after 90min. MY also maintains good pupil dilation during cataract surgery

Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert(®)) versus topical drops

AIM: To compare the mydriatic efficacy of an ophthalmic insert (Mydriasert, MY) versus phenylephrine and tropicamide (PT) eye drops. METHODS: Two controlled, prospective, randomized, single-blind studies were performed. In the first study, a total of 80 eyes from 40 outpatient-clinic patients were analyzed. PT drops were applied to the right eye, and a MY device was inserted in the left eye for 30min. Time until maximal pupil dilation for each eye was then assessed. In the second study, 80 eyes from 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery were analyzed. Pupil dilation was achieved using either PT drops three-times for one hour prior to surgery (40 patients), or a MY device was inserted one hour prior to surgery (40 patients). RESULTS: In the first study, MY achieved superior mydriasis compared to PT eye drops at 90min (9.04 +/- 1.33mm vs 8.78 +/- 1.37mm, P=0.012). However MY took longer than PT drops to achieve maximal dilation, and mydriasis was inferior in eyes with MY compared to PT drops at 30min (7.21 +/- 1.73mm vs8.22 +/- 1.43mm, P < 0.001), the two groups only becoming similar by 60min (8.85 +/- 1.44mm vs8.71 +/- 1.27mm, P=0.236). In the second study, both MY and PT achieved similar levels of mydriasis at the beginning of surgery (8.75 +/- 0.76mm with MY vs8.77 +/- 0.63mm with PT), and also at the end of surgery (7.96 +/- 1.06mm with MY vs 8.32 +/- 0.72mm with PT), with no significant difference between groups (P=0.08). MY was well tolerated and cardiovascular effects were not influenced by dilation method. CONLUSION: MY could be a safe and efficacious alternative for mydriasis. The mydriatic effect of MY is as good as conventional PT eye drops after 60min, and is superior after 90min. MY also maintains good pupil dilation during cataract surgery