14 research outputs found

    Retinoid plus antimicrobial combination treatments for acne

    No full text
    Ashley N Feneran1, William S Kaufman2, Tushar S Dabade1, Steven R Feldman1,3,41Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 2Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA, USA; 3Department of Pathology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 4Department of Public Health Sciences, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USABackground: Acne vulgaris is a chronic disease with several pathogenic factors. Multiple medications are typically used that can lead to nonadherence and treatment failure. Combination medications target multiple pathways of acne formation and may offer therapeutic benefit.Purpose: To explore the efficacy and tolerability of combination retinoid plus antimicrobial treatments in acne vulgaris.Methods: A PubMed and Google search was conducted for combination therapies of clindamycin and tretinoin, with secondary analysis of related citations and references. Similar searches were completed for the combination medications of benzoyl peroxide plus clindamycin or erythromycin, and for the combination therapy of adapalene and benzoyl peroxide.Results: Combination clindamycin phosphate and tretinoin gel was found to be more efficacious than monotherapy of either drug or its vehicle for acne, including inflammatory acne, and has a greater onset of action than either drug alone. Clindamycin phosphate and tretinoin gel was well-tolerated, and adherence to its use exceeded that of using both medications in separate formulations. Benzoyl peroxide-containing combination medications with clindamycin or erythromycin were both more effective in the treatment of acne than either drug alone. Both medications were well-tolerated, with dry skin being the most common adverse effect.Conclusions: Combination medications have superior efficacy and adherence, and have a similar tolerability profile compared with monotherapy of its components. Several studies have found antibiotic-containing combination products with a retinoid effective for acne. The use of antibiotic-containing combination medications for acne can lead to bacterial resistance. Due to this potential for bacterial resistance, benzoyl peroxide treatments are also recommended in combination with a retinoid.Keywords: erythromycin, adherence, efficacy, safety, tolerability&nbsp

    Association of Pain and Itch With Depth of Invasion and Inflammatory Cell Constitution in Skin Cancer

    No full text
    IMPORTANCE: This study highlights a simple bedside evaluation of itch and pain for suspicious skin lesions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the correlation of pain and itch with histologic features of skin cancers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This large, prospective, clinicopathologic study enrolled patients who filled out questionnaires that assessed itch and pain intensity of their skin tumors at the time of excision. Study participants were from the patient population presenting to the Department of Dermatology surgical unit at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center from July 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011. Study participants included 268 patients, representing 339 histopathologically confirmed cutaneous neoplasms. The following skin cancer subtypes were represented in this analysis: 166 basal cell carcinomas, 146 squamous cell carcinomas, and 27 melanomas. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Itch and pain associated with skin cancer at the time of excision ranked on an 11-point (score range, 0-10) numerical visual analog scale and histopathologic analysis for each neoplasm (assessment of the amount and type of inflammation, ulceration, perineural invasion, and depth of invasion). RESULTS: The prevalence of itch and pain across all skin cancers was 36.9% and 28.2%, respectively. However, these symptoms were mostly absent in melanomas. Pain intensity was significantly associated with the degree of inflammation (mild or none vs moderate or marked; P < .001), presence of neutrophils in the inflammatory infiltrate (predominantly mononuclear vs mixed or neutrophilic; P = .003), presence of eosinophils (present vs absent; P = .007), ulceration (yes vs no; P = .003), perineural invasion (yes vs no; P < .001), depth of invasion (P = .001), and largest diameter length of skin lesion (P < .003). Itch intensity was significantly associated with the degree of inflammation (mild or none vs moderate or marked; P = .001) and the presence of eosinophils (present vs absent; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings support the theory that itch emanates from the upper layers of the skin, whereas pain is associated with deeper processes. This study also reports that a simple bedside assessment for the presence and intensity of pain or itch is an easily implementable tool for physicians evaluating suspicious skin lesions

    RimabotulinumtoxinB vs. onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of forehead lines: an evaluator-blind, randomized, pilot study

    No full text
    Background : Optimum dose ratios of rimabotulinumtoxinB (BTX-B) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) have not been determined for forehead wrinkles. Objective : To compare the efficacy and safety of BTX-B and BTX-A for the treatment of forehead lines. Methods : Twenty-two women (mean age, 40 years) with symmetrical moderate to severe forehead lines were randomized to receive single intramuscular injections of BTX-A and BTX-B on either side of the forehead, at a potency ratio of 1 : 70 or 1 : 100. Subjects were followed-up for 16 weeks. Four physicians evaluated patients photographs according to the 4-point Facial Wrinkling Grade (FWG). Clinical Improvement Scale (CIS) was calculated by subtracting FWG score at each visit from that at baseline. Patient satisfaction scores and adverse events were also recorded. Results : Both BTX-A and BTX-B were effective for the treatment of forehead lines. At both potency ratios, BTX-A had a longer duration of action than BTX-B, while BTX-B led to faster improvement than BTX-A. There was no significant difference in CIS between 700 U and 1000 U BTX-B treatments. Adverse effects were mild and transient. Conclusion : Both BTX-A and BTX-B were effective and well tolerated for the treatment of forehead wrinkles at potency ratios of 1 : 70 and 1 : 100.OAIID:oai:osos.snu.ac.kr:snu2013-01/102/2008000790/3SEQ:3PERF_CD:SNU2013-01EVAL_ITEM_CD:102USER_ID:2008000790ADJUST_YN:NEMP_ID:A079501DEPT_CD:801CITE_RATE:2.694FILENAME:btx forforehead jeadv2013 jan.pdfDEPT_NM:의학과CONFIRM:
    corecore