The social construction and consequences of groundwater modelling: insight from the Mancha Oriental aquifer, Spain

[EN] Groundwater flow models have been increasingly used to support policy making. A substantial amount of research has been dedicated to improving, validating and calibrating models and including stakeholders in the modelling process. However, little research has been done to analyze how the choices of model makers and steering by policy makers result in models with specific characteristics, which only allow specific modelling outcomes, and how the use of these modelling outcomes leads to specific social, economic and environmental consequences. In this study, we use the social construction of technology framework to explore the development, characteristics and uses of the groundwater model of the Mancha Oriental aquifer in Spain. The specific characteristics and functioning of this model influenced the policy implementation, implying that involving stakeholders in the development and use of models is crucial for improved democratic policy making.This work was carried out as part of the collaboration agreement between the University of Castilla–La Mancha and Wageningen University. The research is also part of Femke Rambags’ MSc Thesis. David Sanz was supported by the Grants for Stays at Other Universities and Research Centres (UCLM). Special thanks go to the Júcar Water Authority (CHJ) and stakeholders (JCRMO) in the Mancha Oriental System for the necessary information. We would also like to thank Dr A. Sahuquillo of the Universitat Politècnica de València de Valencia and Dr S. Castaño of the University of Castilla–La Mancha for comments and participation in the first stage of modelling. The contents of this paper do not represent the views of CHJ or JCRMO. Finally, we thank the two anonymous reviewers of this article for their valuable comments and suggestions.Sanz Martínez, D.; Vos, J.; Rambags, F.; Hoogesteger, J.; Cassiraga, EF.; Gómez-Alday, JJ. (2018). The social construction and consequences of groundwater modelling: insight from the Mancha Oriental aquifer, Spain. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2018.1495619S122Beall, A. M., & Ford, A. (2010). Reports from the Field. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 1(2), 72-89. doi:10.4018/jissc.2010040105Beven, K. (2000). On model uncertainty, risk and decision making. Hydrological Processes, 14(14), 2605-2606. doi:10.1002/1099-1085(20001015)14:143.0.co;2-wBijker, W. E. (s. f.). Social Construction of Technology. A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, 88-94. doi:10.1002/9781444310795.ch15Bots, P. W. G., Bijlsma, R., von Korff, Y., Van der Fluit, N., & Wolters, H. (2011). Supporting the Constructive Use of Existing Hydrological Models in Participatory Settings: a Set of “Rules of the Game” Ecology and Society, 16(2). doi:10.5751/es-03643-160216Budds, J. (2009). Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum, 40(3), 418-430. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008CALERA, A., GARRIDO-RUBIO, J., BELMONTE, M., ARELLANO, I., FRAILE, L., CAMPOS, I., & OSANN, A. (2017). REMOTE SENSING-BASED WATER ACCOUNTING TO SUPPORT GOVERNANCE FOR GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT FOR IRRIGATION IN LA MANCHA ORIENTAL AQUIFER, SPAIN. Water Resources Management IX. doi:10.2495/wrm170121Cassiraga, E., Sanz, D., Castaño, S. Álvarez, O. & Sahuquillo, A. (2013). Modelo de flujo subterráneo de los acuíferos de la Mancha Oriental y sus relaciones con el río Júcar [Groundwater model flow of the Mancha Oriental Aquifer and their relations with the Júcar River]. Unpublished report (pp 77). Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar.Castaño, S., Sanz, D., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2009). Methodology for Quantifying Groundwater Abstractions for Agriculture via Remote Sensing and GIS. Water Resources Management, 24(4), 795-814. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9473-7Castaño, S., Sanz, D., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2013). Sensitivity of a Groundwater Flow Model to Both Climatic Variations and Management Scenarios in a Semi-arid Region of SE Spain. Water Resources Management, 27(7), 2089-2101. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0277-4Castilla-Rho, J. C. (2017). Groundwater Modeling with Stakeholders: Finding the Complexity that Matters. Groundwater, 55(5), 620-625. doi:10.1111/gwat.12569Doherty, J., & Simmons, C. T. (2013). Groundwater modelling in decision support: reflections on a unified conceptual framework. Hydrogeology Journal, 21(7), 1531-1537. doi:10.1007/s10040-013-1027-7Ferrer, J. & Garijo, L. (2013). Mercados del agua y flexibilización del marco concesional [Water markets and flexibilization of the concessional framework]. XI Semin. Nac. “Transparencia y concesiones” Obs. del Agua la Fund. Botín.Forsyth, T. (2004). Critical Political Ecology. doi:10.4324/9780203017562Giordano, M. (2009). Global Groundwater? Issues and Solutions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 153-178. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.030308.100251Hernández-Mora, N., del Moral Ituarte, L., La-Roca, F., La Calle, A., & Schmidt, G. (2014). Interbasin Water Transfers in Spain: Interregional Conflicts and Governance Responses. Globalized Water, 175-194. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7323-3_13Holley, C., Sinclair, D., Lopez-Gunn, E., & Schlager, E. (2016). Conjunctive Management Through Collective Action. Integrated Groundwater Management, 229-252. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_9Hoogesteger, J., & Wester, P. (2015). Intensive groundwater use and (in)equity: Processes and governance challenges. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 117-124. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.004Hoogesteger, J., & Wester, P. (2017). Regulating groundwater use: The challenges of policy implementation in Guanajuato, Central Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 107-113. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.002Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Hunt, R. J., Rinaudo, J.-D., Ross, A., Arshad, M., & Hamilton, S. (2016). Integrated Groundwater Management: An Overview of Concepts and Challenges. Integrated Groundwater Management, 3-20. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_1Kahil, M. T., Ward, F. A., Albiac, J., Eggleston, J., & Sanz, D. (2016). Hydro-economic modeling with aquifer–river interactions to guide sustainable basin management. Journal of Hydrology, 539, 510-524. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.057Konikow, L. F., & Bredehoeft, J. D. (1992). Ground-water models cannot be validated. Advances in Water Resources, 15(1), 75-83. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(92)90033-xKonikow, L. F., & Kendy, E. (2005). Groundwater depletion: A global problem. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(1), 317-320. doi:10.1007/s10040-004-0411-8Lopez-Gunn, E. (2003). The Role of Collective Action in Water Governance: A Comparative Study of Groundwater User Associations in La Mancha Aquifers in Spain. Water International, 28(3), 367-378. doi:10.1080/02508060308691711Massuel, S., Cappelaere, B., Favreau, G., Leduc, C., Lebel, T., & Vischel, T. (2011). Integrated surface water–groundwater modelling in the context of increasing water reserves of a regional Sahelian aquifer. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(7), 1242-1264. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.609171Melsen, L. A., Addor, N., Mizukami, N., Newman, A. J., Torfs, P. J. J. F., Clark, M. P., … Teuling, A. J. (2018). Mapping (dis)agreement in hydrologic projections. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(3), 1775-1791. doi:10.5194/hess-22-1775-2018MOLLE, F. (2008). Why Enough Is Never Enough: The Societal Determinants of River Basin Closure. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(2), 217-226. doi:10.1080/07900620701723646Narain, V., & Singh, A. K. (2017). Flowing against the current: The socio-technical mediation of water (in)security in periurban Gurgaon, India. Geoforum, 81, 66-75. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.010Pérez, M. A. (2005). Modelo distribuido de simulación del ciclo hidrológico con calidad de aguas integrado en sistemas de información geográfica para grandes cuencas [Distributed model of simulation of the hydrological cycle with water quality integrated in geographic information systems for large basins]. (Ph.D. Thesis). Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain.Rambags, F. (2014). The social shaping of the hydrological model of the Mancha Oriental System. (Msc Thesis Water resources management). Wageningen University.Refsgaard, J. C., & Henriksen, H. J. (2004). Modelling guidelines––terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources, 27(1), 71-82. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006Sanz, D., Calera, A., Castaño, S., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2015). Knowledge, participation, and transparency in groundwater management. Water Policy, wp2015024. doi:10.2166/wp.2015.024Sanz, D., Castaño, S., Cassiraga, E., Sahuquillo, A., Gómez-Alday, J. J., Peña, S., & Calera, A. (2011). Modeling aquifer–river interactions under the influence of groundwater abstraction in the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Hydrogeology Journal, 19(2), 475-487. doi:10.1007/s10040-010-0694-xSanz, D., Gómez-Alday, J. J., Castaño, S., Moratalla, A., De las Heras, J., & Martínez-Alfaro, P. E. (2009). Hydrostratigraphic framework and hydrogeological behaviour of the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Hydrogeology Journal, 17(6), 1375-1391. doi:10.1007/s10040-009-0446-yTortajada, C. (2010). Water Governance: Some Critical Issues. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(2), 297-307. doi:10.1080/07900621003683298Vaux, H. (2010). Groundwater under stress: the importance of management. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62(1), 19-23. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0490-xVoinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders☆. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1268-1281. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007Voinov, A., Kolagani, N., McCall, M. K., Glynn, P. D., Kragt, M. E., Ostermann, F. O., … Ramu, P. (2016). Modelling with stakeholders – Next generation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 196-220. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.016Voss, C. I. (2011). Editor’s message: Groundwater modeling fantasies —part 1, adrift in the details. Hydrogeology Journal, 19(7), 1281-1284. doi:10.1007/s10040-011-0789-zWester, P., Hoogesteger, J. & Vincent, L. (2009). Local IWRM organizations for groundwater regulation: The experiences of the Aquifer Management Councils (COTAS) in Guanajuato, Mexico. Natural Resources Forum 33(1), 29–38. doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01206.

Microbial contaminant removal and alternative nitrogen removal pathways in denitrifying bioreactors

Denitrifying bioreactors, simple treatment systems consisting of a container filled with a particulate organic carbon source, are an effective and low-cost technology for the effective removal of nitrogen (N) from water by enhancing denitrification (i.e. the bacterial conversion of nitrate [NO3-] to N gas). To date, studies on denitrifying bioreactors have mainly focused on the ability of, and factors influencing, the removal of NO3- within these systems. In the research presented in this thesis, a more holistic view of denitrifying bioreactors was taken in which N removal was assessed in conjunction with the removal of faecal microbial contaminants. The objectives of this research were: (1) to assess how well denitrifying bioreactors can remove microbial contaminant loads from wastewater and (2) to assess the potential role of alternative N removal pathways, namely anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) and codenitrification for N removal in denitrifying bioreactors. The first part of this thesis focused on the removal of microbial contaminants in denitrifying bioreactors. Removal of microbial contaminants from wastewater is a key factor in wastewater treatment, since the contamination of receiving waters with inadequately treated wastewater can contribute to the transmission of infectious disease caused by waterborne pathogenic microorganisms. First, the removal of bacterial and viral indicators (Escherichia coli [E. coli] and F-specific RNA bacteriophage [FRNA bacteriophage]) was assessed along the longitudinal transect of a full-scale operating woodchip bioreactor (~114 m3 in size with 9 sampling wells along the length of the bioreactors) loaded with nitrified septic tank effluent. In addition to significant reduction in NO3- loads, the bioreactor demonstrated consistent and substantial reduction of E. coli (2.9 log10 reduction) and FRNA bacteriophage (3.9 log10 reduction) despite receiving highly fluctuating inflow concentrations (up to 3.5 × 105 MPN/100mL and 1.1 × 105 PFU/100 mL,respectively). In a follow-up experiment, removal of E. coli, total coliforms (TC) and FRNA bacteriophage was analysed in fifteen mesocosm scale bioreactors (~700 L each) filled with two different carbon sources: woodchip or coconut husk. The effect of media age on attenuation of microbial contaminants was assessed by comparing the performance of 8-year old systems with equivalent newly constructed woodchip and coconut husk bioreactors. Additionally, removal performance of these carbon substrates was compared to that of gravel, a non-carbon substrate commonly used in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Substantial reduction of E. coli, TC and FRNA bacteriophage from primary treated municipal wastewater was achieved in all bioreactors. Mean annual log10 removal efficiencies were similar between microbial indicators ranging from 1.4 to 1.9 for TC, 1.3 to 1.8 for E. coli and 1.3 to 2.0 for FRNA bacteriophage. All denitrifying bioreactors showed consistent year-round performance and long-term performance that was not greatly dependent on age of carbon material. The results from both studies suggested that denitrifying bioreactors, as well as reducing N loads, can effectively reduce microbial contaminants in wastewater, providing a complimentary disinfection role. Denitrification has generally been considered the major pathway converting NO3- to dinitrogen gas (N2) in denitrifying bioreactors. In the second part of the thesis, the importance of anaerobic ammonium oxidation and codenitrification (jointly referred to as An/coD), was assessed by monitoring the removal of N species from partially nitrified municipal wastewater passing through the mesocosm scale bioreactors described above. Lab experiments using a 15N isotope-pairing technique were also performed to partition production of N2 to these different microbial processes. Results obtained from this study altered our understanding of the potential mechanisms responsible for N loss in these systems. The effective removal of both NO3- and ammonium (NH4+) and the formation of hybrid N2 (i.e. 29N2) observed in bioreactors demonstrated that the An/coD pathway was an effective pathway for N removal when both NO3- and NH4+ were present. An/coD removal rates ranged from 0.6 to 3.8 g N per m3 reactor volume per day while denitrification rates ranged from 0.7 to 2.6 g N per m3. The contributions of An/coD to N removal was dependent on media, with An/coD becoming more dominant in bioreactors where denitrification was carbon limited. The research presented in this thesis has important implications for the use of denitrifying bioreactors for domestic wastewater treatment, since it demonstrates that in addition to removing NO3-, denitrifying bioreactors can also remove microbial contaminants and NH4+, both commonly present in domestic wastewater. A greater understanding of factors controlling microbial contaminant removal, denitrification and An/coD activity in these systems would allow improved design of bioreactors with the capacity to treat a broader range of wastewater contaminants. The thesis opens a discussion on the potential of denitrifying bioreactors to evolve into a reliable treatment technology for different types of wastewater contaminants