10 research outputs found

    Impact of mutations in Toll-like receptor pathway genes on esophageal carcinogenesis.

    Get PDF
    Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) develops in an inflammatory microenvironment with reduced microbial diversity, but mechanisms for these influences remain poorly characterized. We hypothesized that mutations targeting the Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway could disrupt innate immune signaling and promote a microenvironment that favors tumorigenesis. Through interrogating whole genome sequencing data from 171 EAC patients, we showed that non-synonymous mutations collectively affect the TLR pathway in 25/171 (14.6%, PathScan p = 8.7x10-5) tumors. TLR mutant cases were associated with more proximal tumors and metastatic disease, indicating possible clinical significance of these mutations. Only rare mutations were identified in adjacent Barrett's esophagus samples. We validated our findings in an external EAC dataset with non-synonymous TLR pathway mutations in 33/149 (22.1%, PathScan p = 0.05) tumors, and in other solid tumor types exposed to microbiomes in the COSMIC database (10,318 samples), including uterine endometrioid carcinoma (188/320, 58.8%), cutaneous melanoma (377/988, 38.2%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (402/1519, 26.5%), and stomach adenocarcinoma (151/579, 26.1%). TLR4 was the most frequently mutated gene with eleven mutations in 10/171 (5.8%) of EAC tumors. The TLR4 mutants E439G, S570I, F703C and R787H were confirmed to have impaired reactivity to bacterial lipopolysaccharide with marked reductions in signaling by luciferase reporter assays. Overall, our findings show that TLR pathway genes are recurrently mutated in EAC, and TLR4 mutations have decreased responsiveness to bacterial lipopolysaccharide and may play a role in disease pathogenesis in a subset of patients

    TLR pathway mutations in EAC.

    No full text
    <p>The EAC samples with TLR pathway mutations in the (A) ICGC cohort (n = 171 patients) and (B) TCGA cohort (n = 149 patients), with gene names along the vertical axis and sample names along the horizontal axis. The mutation status for known driver mutations in EAC (<i>TP53</i>, <i>CDKN2A</i>, <i>SMAD4</i>, <i>PIK3CA</i>) is presented for each sample with TLR pathway mutations in the ICGC and TCGA cohorts. Recurring oncogenic amplifications (<i>ERBB2</i>, <i>EGFR</i>, <i>CCND1</i>) and deletions (<i>CDKN2A/B</i>) that are known drivers in EAC are presented for the ICGC cohort. LY96 is the gene encoding MD2 protein. (C) Total TLR pathway mutation frequency from the combined ICGC and TCGA cohorts (n = 320), with gene names along the vertical axis and percent of mutated samples along the horizontal axis. (D) Schematic of the TLR signaling pathway summarizing the somatic mutations from the combined ICGC and TCGA cohorts, with mutated pathway components highlighted in color and large bold font. Grey pathway components have no TLR pathway mutations in either cohort.</p

    Distribution of TLR pathway mutations in EAC and other cancers.

    No full text
    <p>(A) TLR pathway mutations in different cancer types from the COSMIC database, with cancer types along the vertical axis and percent of mutated samples along the horizontal axis (abbreviations provided in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006808#pgen.1006808.s003" target="_blank">S3 Table</a>). <i>TLR4</i> mutations are indicated in dark blue. (B) Schematic of TLR4 protein with mutations from the ICGC (green circles) and TCGA (purple circles) EAC cohorts. Both EAC cohorts identified missense mutations at amino acid position E439 and F487. (C) Schematic of TLR4 protein with mutations from different cancer types in the COSMIC database. (D) Three lanes show dimer contacts (to other TLR4 chain), MD2, and LPS (PDB ID: 4G8A [<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006808#pgen.1006808.ref022" target="_blank">22</a>]). The fourth lane was calculated from a homology model of TLR4 TIR domain dimer (based on PDB ID: 2J67 [<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006808#pgen.1006808.ref023" target="_blank">23</a>]). Contacting TLR4 residues with atoms less than 0.5 脜 apart at surfaces were determined using Chimera findclash function. Numbers of contacts are plotted in 10 residue sections of increasingly dark red tones (maximum 8 is black).</p

    Functional analysis of <i>TLR4</i> mutations.

    No full text
    <p>(A) NF-魏B response to TLR4 ligands in HEK293 cells transfected with <i>TLR4</i> mutants <i>versus</i> wild-type <i>TLR4</i> and stimulated with 100 ng/ml synthetic Lipid A and 10ng/ml LPS. The y-axis is normalized luminescence, calculated by dividing NF-魏B firefly luciferase by the housekeeper renilla luciferase. Results are the average of three experiments with all conditions performed in triplicate. Error bars are standard deviation. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. (B) TLR4 protein expression 48 hours after transfection for NF-魏B luciferase reporter assays. Representative Western blot shows protein expression for nine <i>TLR4</i> mutants, the double mutant (E439G + F703C), wild-type <i>TLR4</i> and empty vector. Fully glycosylated TLR4 is the upper band (120 kDa), and deglycosylated TLR4 is the lower band (110 kDa). (C) Immunofluorescence staining FLAG-AlexaFluor 488 antibody (green) in HEK293 cells transfected with wild-type TLR4-FLAG shows cytoplasmic distribution, in comparison to empty vector. Mutant E439G and R787H did not show any difference in localization of TLR4 protein. DAPI (blue) and Phalloidin (red) were used to visualize the cell nucleus and cytoskeleton, respectively. (D) Fold-change secretion of IL-8 for the EAC cell lines OE33 and JH-EsoAd1 following transfection of <i>TLR4</i> mutants E439G, R787H, E439G+F703C and wild type <i>TLR4</i>. Cells were stimulated with synthetic MPLA and LPS for 24 hours prior to ELISA. Data were normalized by dividing the concentration of IL-8 by the unstimulated (nil) value for each transfection condition. Data are an average of four independent experiments performed in duplicate. Error bars are standard deviation. *p<0.05, **p<0.01,</p
    corecore