The biogenesis and function of nucleosome arrays

Numerous chromatin remodeling enzymes position nucleosomes in eukaryotic cells. Aside from these factors, transcription, DNA sequence, and statistical positioning of nucleosomes also shape the nucleosome landscape. The precise contributions of these processes remain unclear due to their functional redundancy in vivo. By incisive genome engineering, we radically decreased their redundancy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The transcriptional machinery strongly disrupts evenly spaced nucleosomes. Proper nucleosome density and DNA sequence are critical for their biogenesis. The INO80 remodeling complex helps space nucleosomes in vivo and positions the first nucleosome over genes in an H2A.Z-independent fashion. INO80 requires its Arp8 subunit but unexpectedly not the Nhp10 module for spacing. Cells with irregularly spaced nucleosomes suffer from genotoxic stress including DNA damage, recombination and transpositions. We derive a model of the biogenesis of the nucleosome landscape and suggest that it evolved not only to regulate but also to protect the genome

Epigenetic histone modifications H3K36me3 and H4K5/8/12/16ac induce open polynucleosome conformations via different mechanisms

Nucleosomes are the basic compaction unit of chromatin and nucleosome structure and their higher-order assemblies regulate genome accessibility. Many post-translational modifications alter nucleosome dynamics, nucleosome-nucleosome interactions, and ultimately chromatin structure and gene expression. Here, we investigate the role of two post-translational modifications associated with actively transcribed regions, H3K36me3 and H4K5/8/12/16ac, in the contexts of tri-nucleosome arrays that provide a tractable model system for quantitative single-molecule analysis, while enabling us to probe nucleosome-nucleosome interactions. Direct visualization by AFM imaging reveals that H3K36me3 and H4K5/8/12/16ac nucleosomes adopt significantly more open and loose conformations than unmodified nucleosomes. Similarly, magnetic tweezers force spectroscopy shows a reduction in DNA outer turn wrapping and nucleosome-nucleosome interactions for the modified nucleosomes. The results suggest that for H3K36me3 the increased breathing and outer DNA turn unwrapping seen in mononucleosomes propagates to more open conformations in nucleosome arrays. In contrast, the even more open structures of H4K5/8/12/16ac nucleosome arrays do not appear to derive from the dynamics of the constituent mononucleosomes, but are driven by reduced nucleosome-nucleosome interactions, suggesting that stacking interactions can overrule DNA breathing of individual nucleosomes. We anticipate that our methodology will be broadly applicable to reveal the influence of other post-translational modifications and to observe the activity of nucleosome remodelers

ISWI Remodelling of Physiological Chromatin Fibres Acetylated at Lysine 16 of Histone H4

ISWI is the catalytic subunit of several ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling factors that catalyse the sliding of nucleosomes along DNA and thereby endow chromatin with structural flexibility. Full activity of ISWI requires residues of a basic patch of amino acids in the N-terminal 'tail' of histone H4. Previous studies employing oligopeptides and mononucleosomes suggested that acetylation of the H4 tail at lysine 16 (H4K16) within the basic patch may inhibit the activity of ISWI. On the other hand, the acetylation of H4K16 is known to decompact chromatin fibres. Conceivably, decompaction may enhance the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA and the H4 tail for ISWI interactions. Such an effect can only be evaluated at the level of nucleosome arrays. We probed the influence of H4K16 acetylation on the ATPase and nucleosome sliding activity of Drosophila ISWI in the context of defined, in vitro reconstituted chromatin fibres with physiological nucleosome spacing and linker histone content. Contrary to widespread expectations, the acetylation did not inhibit ISWI activity, but rather stimulated ISWI remodelling under certain conditions. Therefore, the effect of H4K16 acetylation on ISWI remodelling depends on the precise nature of the substrate

Myosin Va’s adaptor protein melanophilin enforces track selection on the microtubule and actin networks in vitro

Significance Inner organization of eukaryotic cells intimately depends on the active transport of diverse intracellular cargo on the ubiquitous actin and microtubule networks. The underlying mechanisms of such directional transport processes have been of outstanding interest. We studied a motor complex composed of Rab27a, melanophilin, and myosin Va and found, surprisingly, that the adaptor protein melanophilin toggled the binding preference toward actin or microtubules in vitro. Our results offer unexpected mechanistic insights into biasing the directionality of a moving organelle on the cytoskeleton through phospho-targeting the adaptor protein rather than its motor in vivo.</jats:p

The DNA binding CXC domain of MSL2 is required for faithful targeting the Dosage Compensation Complex to the X chromosome

Dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster involves the selective targeting of the male X chromosome by the dosage compensation complex (DCC) and the coordinate, ∼2-fold activation of most genes. The principles that allow the DCC to distinguish the X chromosome from the autosomes are not understood. Targeting presumably involves DNA sequence elements whose combination or enrichment mark the X chromosome. DNA sequences that characterize ‘chromosomal entry sites’ or ‘high-affinity sites’ may serve such a function. However, to date no DNA binding domain that could interpret sequence information has been identified within the subunits of the DCC. Early genetic studies suggested that MSL1 and MSL2 serve to recognize high-affinity sites (HAS) in vivo, but a direct interaction of these DCC subunits with DNA has not been studied. We now show that recombinant MSL2, through its CXC domain, directly binds DNA with low nanomolar affinity. The DNA binding of MSL2 or of an MSL2–MSL1 complex does not discriminate between different sequences in vitro, but in a reporter gene assay in vivo, suggesting the existence of an unknown selectivity cofactor. Reporter gene assays and localization of GFP-fusion proteins confirm the important contribution of the CXC domain for DCC targeting in vivo