9 research outputs found

    Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and predictive biomarkers in malignant mesothelioma: Work still in progress

    Get PDF
    Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare and aggressive neoplasm, usually associated with a poor prognosis (5 years survival rate <10%). For unresectable disease, platinum and pemetrexed chemotherapy has been the only standard of care in first line for more than two decades, while no standard treatments have been approved in subsequent lines. Recently, immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of MM. In fact, the combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab has been approved in first line setting. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed promising results also in second-third line setting after platinum-based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, approximately 20% of patients are primary refractory to ICIs and there is an urgent need for reliable biomarkers to improve patient’s selection. Several biological and molecular features have been studied for this goal. In particular, histological subtype (recognized as prognostic factor for MM and predictive factor for chemotherapy response), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and tumor mutational burden (widely hypothesized as predictive biomarkers for ICIs in several solid tumors) have been evaluated, but with unconclusive results. On the other hand, the deep analysis of tumor infiltrating microenvironment and the improvement in genomic profiling techniques has led to a better knowledge of several mechanisms underlying the MM biology and a greater or poorer immune activation. Consequentially, several potential biomarkers predictive of response to immunotherapy in patients with MM have been identified, also if all these elements need to be further investigated and prospectively validated.In this paper, the main evidences about clinical efficacy of ICIs in MM and the literature data about the most promising predictive biomarkers to immunotherapy are reviewed

    Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and adenosine receptors modulate prostaglandin E2 and cytokine production in human osteoarthritic synovial fibroblasts

    Get PDF
    Objective. Synovial fibroblasts (SFs) contribute to the development of osteoarthritis (OA) by the secretion of a wide range of pro-inflammatory mediators, including cytokines and lipid mediators of inflammation (1). Previous studies show that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) may represent a potential therapeutical approach to limit cartilage degradation and to control inflammation associated to OA, and that they may act through the adenosine pathway (2). On this basis the aim of this study was to investigate if EMFs might modulate inflammatory activities of human SFs derived from OA patients (OASFs) and the possible involvement of adenosine receptors (ARs) in mediating EMF effects. Design. SFs obtained from OA patients, undergoing total hip joint replacement surgery, were exposed to EMFs (1.5 mT; 75 Hz) for 24 hours. In control and EMF-exposed cells, ARs were evaluated by western blotting, quantitative real-time RT-PCR and saturation binding experiments and cAMP levels were measured by a specific assay. In the absence and in the presence of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), used as a pro-inflammatory stimulus, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), cytokine and matrix degrading enzyme production was evaluated in OASFs exposed to EMFs and treated with selective adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists. Results. EMF exposure induced a selective increase in A2A and A3 ARs. These increases were associated to changes in cAMP levels, indicating that ARs were functionally active in EMF-exposed cells. In IL-1β-treated OASFs, functional data obtained in the presence of  A2A and A3 adenosine agonists and antagonists showed that EMFs inhibit the release of (PGE2) and of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8), whilst stimulate the release of interleukin-10 (IL-10), an antinflammatory cytokine. Further, results show that these effects appear to be mediated by the EMF-induced upregulation of A2A and A3 ARs. No effects of EMFs or ARs have been observed on matrix degrading enzymes production. Conclusions: EMFs display anti-inflammatory effects in human OASFs and these EMF-induced .ffects are in part mediated by the adenosine pathway, specifically by the A2A and A3 ARs activation. Taken together, these results suggest that SFs could represent potential therapeutic targets cells for EMF treatment and open new clinical perspectives to the control of inflammation associated to joint diseases. 1. Martel-Pelletier J et al. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2010; 21(1):2-14. 2. De Mattei M et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17(2):252-262

    Prognostic Significance of Organ-Specific Metastases in Patients with Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

    No full text
    Background: Existing data on metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC) are limited. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of site-specific metastases in patients with mUTUC and its association with survival outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis with a log-rank test was used for survival comparisons. Multivariate Cox regression was employed to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results: 633 patients were selected in this study cohort. The median follow-up was 6 months (IQR 2–13) and a total of 584 (92.3%) deaths were recorded. Within the population presenting with a single metastatic organ site, the most common metastatic sites were distant lymph nodes, accounting for 36%, followed by lung, bone and liver metastases, accounting for 26%, 22.8% and 16.2%, respectively. In patients with a single metastatic organ site, the Kaplan–Meier curves showed significantly worse OS for patients with liver metastases vs. patients presenting with metastases in a distant lymph node (p < 0.001), bone (p = 0.023) or lung (p = 0.026). When analyzing CSS, statistically significant differences were detectable only between patients presenting with liver metastases vs. distant lymph node metastases (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that the presence of liver (OS: HR = 1.732, 95% CI = 1.234–2.430, p < 0.001; CSS: HR = 1.531, 95% CI = 1.062–2.207, p = 0.022) or multiple metastatic organ sites (OS: HR = 1.425, 95% CI = 1.159–1.753, p < 0.001; CSS: HR = 1.417, 95% CI = 1.141–1.760, p = 0.002) was an independent predictor of poor survival. Additionally, survival benefits were found in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) (OS: HR = 0.675, 95% CI = 0.514–0.886, p = 0.005; CSS: HR = 0.671, 95% CI = 0.505–0.891, p = 0.006) and chemotherapy (CHT) (OS: HR = 0.405, 95% CI = 0.313–0.523, p < 0.001; CSS: HR = 0.435, 95% CI = 0.333–0.570, p < 0.001). Conclusions: A distant lymph node was the most common site of single-organ metastases for mUTUC. Patients with liver metastases and patients with multiple organ metastases exhibited worse survival outcomes. Lastly, CHT administration and RNU were revealed to be predictors of better survival outcomes in the mUTUC cohort

    Thymic Epithelial Tumor and Immune System: The Role of Immunotherapy

    No full text
    Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) comprise a rare group of thoracic cancers, classified as thymomas and thymic carcinomas (TC). To date, chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for advanced disease. Unfortunately, few therapeutic options are available for relapsed/refractory tumors. Unlike other solid cancers, the development of targeted biologic and/or immunologic therapies in TETs remains in its nascent stages. Moreover, since the thymus plays a key role in the development of immune tolerance, thymic tumors have a unique biology, which can confer susceptibility to autoimmune diseases and ultimately influence the risk–benefit balance of immunotherapy, especially for patients with thymoma. Indeed, early results from single-arm studies have shown interesting clinical activity, albeit at a cost of a higher incidence of immune-related side effects. The lack of knowledge of the immune mechanisms associated with TETs and the absence of biomarkers predictive of response or toxicity to immunotherapy risk limiting the evolution of immunotherapeutic strategies for managing these rare tumors. The aim of this review is to summarize the existing literature about the thymus’s immune biology and its association with autoimmune paraneoplastic diseases, as well as the results of the available studies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines

    SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with thymic epithelial tumours with and without active or pre-existing autoimmune disorders: Brief report of a TYME network safety analysis

    No full text
    none19noneGiugliano, Federica; Zucali, Paolo A.; Galli, Giulia; Ballatore, Zelmira; Corti, Chiara; Aliaga, Pamela T.; Uliano, Jacopo; Vivanet, Grazia; Curigliano, Giuseppe; Conforti, Fabio; Queirolo, Paola; Berardi, Rossana; Manglaviti, Sara; Apollonio, Giulia; Perrino, Matteo; Borea, Federica; D'Antonio, Federica; Garassino, Marina C.; De Pas, TommasoGiugliano, Federica; Zucali, Paolo A.; Galli, Giulia; Ballatore, Zelmira; Corti, Chiara; Aliaga, Pamela T.; Uliano, Jacopo; Vivanet, Grazia; Curigliano, Giuseppe; Conforti, Fabio; Queirolo, Paola; Berardi, Rossana; Manglaviti, Sara; Apollonio, Giulia; Perrino, Matteo; Borea, Federica; D'Antonio, Federica; Garassino, Marina C.; De Pas, Tommas

    Study on psychoeducation enhancing results of adherence in patients with schizophrenia (SPERA-S): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Poor adherence to pharmacotherapy negatively affects the course and the outcome of schizophreniaspectrum psychoses, enhancing the risk of relapse. Falloon and coworkers developed a Psychoeducation Program aimed at improving communication and problem-solving abilities in patients and their families. This study set out to evaluate changes in adherence to pharmacotherapy in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum psychoses, by comparing one group exposed to the Falloon Psychoeducation Program (FPP) with another group exposed to family supportive therapy with generic information on the disorders.Methods: 340 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders according to standardized criteria from 10 participating units distributed throughout the Italian National Health System (NHS), will be enrolled with 1:1 allocation by the method of blocks of randomized permutations. Patients will be reassessed at 6, 12 and 18 months after start of treatment (duration: 6 months). The primary objective is to evaluate changes in adherence to pharmacotherapy after psychoeducation. Adherence will be assessed at three-month intervals by measuring blood levels of the primary prescribed drug using high pressure liquid chromatography, and via the Medication Adherence Questionnaire and a modified version of the Adherence Interview. Secondary objectives are changes in the frequency of relapse and readmission, as the main indicator of the course of the disorder. Enrolled patients will be allocated to the FPP (yes/no) randomly, 1:1, in a procedure controlled by the coordinating unit; codes will be masked until the conclusion of the protocol (or the occurrence of a severe negative event). The raters will be blind to treatment allocation and will be tested for blinding after treatment completion. Intention-to-treat will be applied in considering the primary and secondary outcomes. Multiple imputations will be applied to integrate the missing data. The study started recruitment in February 2013; the total duration of the study is 27 months.Discussion: If the psychoeducation program proves effective in improving adherence to pharmacotherapy and in reducing relapse and readmissions, its application could be proposed as a standard adjunctive psychosocial treatment within the Italian NHS. Trial registration: Protocol Registration System of ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01433094; registered on 20 August 2011; first patient was randomized on 12 February 2013. © 2013 Petretto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd
    corecore