16 research outputs found

    Implications of new-onset atrial fibrillation on in-hospital and long-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction:A report from the CBD bank study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: An increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) during the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI) has been observed. But it is still unclear whether the implications of new-onset AF on in-hospital and long-term prognosis are of similar magnitude. METHODS: Using data from the CBD Bank study, 3,824 consecutive AMI patients, without prior AF, were analyzed. During the index hospitalization, all patients were monitored by continuous cardiac monitoring, twice daily performed 12- or 18-lead ECGs and timely ECG checks when cardiac symptoms occurred. Follow-up visits were routinely scheduled after discharge. Primary outcomes were all-cause death and cardiovascular death occurring during hospitalization and long-term follow-up. Secondary outcome was MACEs during hospitalization. RESULTS: During the median hospital stay of 9.0 (7.0, 11.0) days, new-onset AF was documented in 133 (3.48%) patients; 95 (71.43%) patients had AF attacks within 3 days following AMI. Independent risk factors associated with new-onset AF were older age, larger left atrial diameter, higher level of NT-proBNP, and primary PCI. New-onset AF was found to be significantly associated with in-hospital all-cause death (OR 4.33, 95%CI: 2.37-7.89, P < 0.001), cardiovascular death (OR 4.10, 95%CI: 2.18-7.73, P < 0.001), and MACEs (OR 2.51, 95%CI: 1.46-4.33, P = 0.001). A total of 112 new-onset AF and 3,338 non-AF patients were followed up for 1,090 (365, 1,694) days after discharge. There was no significant association between new-onset AF and long-term all-cause death (HR 1.21, 95%CI: 0.77-1.92, P = 0.406) or cardiovascular death (HR 1.09, 95%CI: 0.61-1.97, P = 0.764). CONCLUSION: New-onset AF following AMI is strongly associated with an increased risk of adverse in-hospital prognosis, but it does not affect prognosis in those who survive until hospital discharge

    Social determinants of health and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure

    Get PDF
    BackgroundWe examined the associations between family income and educational attainment with incident atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and cardiovascular (CV) death among patients with newly-diagnosed heart failure (HF).MethodsIn a nationwide Danish registry of HF patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2018, we established a cohort for each outcome. When examining AF, MI and stroke, respectively, patients with a history of these outcomes at diagnosis of HF were excluded. We used cause-specific proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios for tertile groups of family income and three levels of educational attainment.ResultsAmong 27,947 AF-free patients, we found no association between income or education and incident AF. Among 27,309 MI-free patients, we found that lower income (hazard ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.11-1.48] and 1.11 [0.96-1.28] for lower and medium vs. higher income) and education (1.23 [1.04-1.45] and 1.15 [0.97-1.36] for lower and medium vs. higher education) were associated with MI. Among 36,801 stroke-free patients, lower income was associated with stroke (1.38 [1.23-1.56] and 1.27 [1.12-1.44] for lower and medium vs. higher income) but not education. Lower income (1.56 [1.46-1.67] and 1.32 [1.23-1.42] for lower and medium vs. higher income) and education (1.20 [1.11-1.29] and 1.07 [0.99-1.15] for lower and medium vs. higher education) were associated with CV death.ConclusionsIn patients with newly-diagnosed HF, lower family income was associated with higher rates of acute MI, stroke and cardiovascular death. Lower educational attainment was associated with higher rates of acute MI and cardiovascular death. There was no evidence of associations between income and education with incident AF

    Validating the predictive ability of the 2MACE score for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation:results from phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF registry

    Get PDF
    The 2MACE score was specifically developed as a risk-stratification tool in atrial fibrillation (AF) to predict cardiovascular outcomes. We evaluated the predictive ability of the 2MACE score in the GLORIA-AF registry. All eligible patients from phase II/III of the prospective global GLORIA-AF registry were included. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as the composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Cox proportional hazards were used to examine the relationship between the 2MACE score and study outcomes. Predictive capability of the 2MACE score was investigated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. A total of 25,696 patients were included (mean age 71 years, female 44.9%). Over 3 years, 1583 MACEs were recorded. Patients who had MACE were older, with more cardiovascular risk factors and were less likely to be managed using a rhythm-control strategy. The median 2MACE score in the MACE and non-MACE groups were 2 (IQR 1–3) and 1 (IQR 0–2), respectively (p &lt; 0.001). The 2MACE score was positively associated with an increase in the risk of MACE, with a score of ≥ 2 providing the best combination of sensitivity (69.6%) and specificity (51.6%), HR 2.47 (95% CI, 2.21–2.77). The 2MACE score had modest predictive performance for MACE in patients with AF (AUC 0.655 (95% CI, 0.641–0.669)). Our analysis in this prospective global registry demonstrates that the 2MACE score can adequately predict the risk of MACE (defined as myocardial infarction, CV death and stroke) in patients with AF. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007 and NCT01937377

    Warfarin and increased fracture risk?:Answering the big question

    No full text

    Outcomes in elderly Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease. A report from the Optimal Thromboprophylaxis in Elderly Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation ( <scp>ChiOTEAF</scp> ) registry

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are closely related; CAD may precede or complicate the clinical course of AF. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of CAD on clinical outcomes among elderly Chinese AF patients. METHODS: The ChiOTEAF registry is a prospective registry conducted in 44 sites from 20 provinces in China between October 2014 and December 2018. Primary outcome was the composite of all‐cause mortality/any thromboembolism (TE)/major bleeding/acute coronary syndrome (ACS). RESULTS: The eligible cohort for this analysis included 6403 individuals (mean age 74.8 ± 10.7; 39.2% female); of these, 3058 (47.8%) had a history of CAD. On multivariate analysis, CAD was independently associated with a higher odds ratio for ACS (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.12–3.52) without a significant impact on other adverse outcomes. Independent variables associated with the composite outcome among CAD patients were: (i) the use of OAC (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.42–0.72), age (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.08–1.11), heart failure (OR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.51–2.50), prior ischemic stroke (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.02–1.64), chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.32–2.22), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.06–1.89). CONCLUSIONS: AF patients with CAD were at an increased risk of developing ACS but there was no significant difference in the composite outcome, all cause death, cardiovascular death, thromboembolic events or major bleeding compared to the non‐CAD group. OAC use was inversely associated with adverse events, yet their uptake was poor in the AF‐CAD population

    Clinical Phenotypes and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrences after Catheter Ablation: An Unsupervised Cluster Analysis.

    No full text
    Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Data-driven cluster analysis is able to better distinguish prognostically-relevant phenotype clusters among patients with AF. We performed a hierarchical cluster analysis in a cohort of AF patients undergoing a first CA and evaluate associations between identified clusters and recurrences of arrhythmia following ablation. The study included 209 AF patients treated with CA. 3 clusters with distinct characteristics were identified. Recurrences at one year occurred in 27.2% in Cluster 1, 43.2% in Cluster 2 and 60.9% in Cluster 3 (p2DS2-VASc score, left atrial volume, type of atrial fibrillation and ejection fraction. To concluded, cluster analysis identified three statistically-driven groups among AF patients treated with CA with different risks for arrhythmia recurrences
    corecore