5 research outputs found

    Direction and Associated Motion in Tibeto-Burman

    Get PDF
    This study analyzes systems of direction and associated motion in 23 languages of the Tibeto-Burman family. Both direction and associated motion can be encoded by a range of grammatical strategies, including affixes, clitics, parti- cles, serial-verb constructions, and auxiliary verbs. While some languages have only associated motion or direction, others have both, either via distinct sub- systems, syntactic ambiguity, or context-dependent interpretation. While direc- tional encodings can be interpreted as associated motion in some contexts, the reverse can also be true. Verbal semantics is key to the pragmatic interpretation of examples in context; some types of motion verbs are more compatible with directional interpretations and others with associated motion. In addition, certain types of motion verbs were found to be compatible with different temporal re- lationships that hold between the activity of the primary verb and the motional component. Finally, the grammatical role of the figure in such constructions de- pends on both the temporal relationship and the semantics of the verb

    Alexia Fawcett

    No full text

    Documenting Language, Culture, and Cognition: Language and Space among the Waorani

    No full text
    This paper looks to investigate the intersection between the disciplines of anthropology,\ud linguistics, and cognitive science through the discussion of documentation projects and\ud documenting spatial language. In focusing on the language and culture of the Waorani, an\ud indigenous group of the Amazonian region of Ecuador, this paper examines the properties of the\ud language's static locative constructions, the language's status as an isolate, and the challenges\ud and successes in the documentation process at present. This study also addresses these topics'\ud relation with the study of the intersection of space, language, and cognition by looking at some\ud of the responses given by native speakers to the prompts in Bowerman and Pederson's (1992)\ud "Topological Relations Picture Series," a set of line drawings that depict simple scenes such as\ud an apple in a bowl. These speakers' responses, as examples of spatial language use, offer what\ud Stephen Levinson (1996:356) calls "more than just a privileged access to [cognition]," which is\ud "the intermediate variable that promises to explain cultural propensities in spatial behavior." This\ud paper supports Levinson's claim that language, culture, and cognition are intimately linked and\ud can be studied through spatial language expressions across cultures. Therefore, any conclusions\ud drawn in this paper may bring the studies of anthropology, linguistics, and cognition closer to\ud finding common ground and possibly contribute to the understanding of human behavior.\ud Because of this, I argue that spatial language expressions are amongst the most important to elicit\ud when doing documentation projects
    corecore