34 research outputs found

    Cis-regulatory variation expands the colour palette of the Brassicaceae.

    Get PDF
    This article comments on: Ye S, Hua S, Ma T, Ma X, Chen Y, Wu L, Zhao L, Yi B, Ma C, Tu J, Shen J, Fu T, Wen J. 2022. Genetic and multi-omics analyses reveal BnaA07.PAP2In-184-317 as the key gene conferring anthocyanin-based color in Brassica napus flowers. Journal of Experimental Botany 73,6630–6645.</jats:p

    Joining the dots.

    No full text
    It is hypothesised that morphological evolution occurs through a variety of molecular mechanisms. Position and patterning of petal spots in Clarkia evolved through changes to the regulatory region of a gene encoding the transcriptional activator of pigment synthesis, prompting its regulation by novel positional cues

    AGAMOUS mediates timing of guard cell formation during gynoecium development

    Get PDF
    In Arabidopsis thaliana, stomata are composed of two guard cells that control the aperture of a central pore to facilitate gas exchange between the plant and its environment, which is particularly important during photosynthesis. Although leaves are the primary photosynthetic organs of flowering plants, floral organs are also photosynthetically active. In the Brassicaceae, evidence suggests that silique photosynthesis is important for optimal seed oil content. A group of transcription factors containing MADS DNA binding domains is necessary and sufficient to confer floral organ identity. Elegant models, such as the ABCE model of flower development and the floral quartet model, have been instrumental in describing the molecular mechanisms by which these floral organ identity proteins govern flower development. However, we lack a complete understanding of how the floral organ identity genes interact with the underlying leaf development program. Here, we show that the MADS domain transcription factor AGAMOUS (AG) represses stomatal development on the gynoecial valves, so that maturation of stomatal complexes coincides with fertilization. We present evidence that this regulation by AG is mediated by direct transcriptional repression of a master regulator of the stomatal lineage, MUTE, and show data that suggests this interaction is conserved among several members of the Brassicaceae. This work extends our understanding of the mechanisms underlying floral organ formation and provides a framework to decipher the mechanisms that control floral organ photosynthesis

    Confocal and epifluorescence imaging of <i>MUTEpro</i>:<i>MUTE-GFP</i> in L-<i>er</i> and <i>ag-10</i> backgrounds.

    No full text
    (A-F) Images of early stage 12 gynoecial valves of MUTEpro:MUTE-GFP in (A-C) a wild-type L-er background and (D-F) an ag-10 background using confocal microscopy. Arrowheads indicate the presence of fluorescent foci. (G-O) Images of MUTEpro:MUTE-GFP (G-L) stage 11 gynoecia in (G-I) a wild-type L-er background, (J-L) an ag-10 background, and (M-O) stage 12 gynoecia in a wild-type L-er background. Each panel is a sample from a different plant. Scale is 100 ÎĽm. (TIF)</p

    Transcriptional response of master regulators of stomatal development to repression of <i>AG</i> activity.

    No full text
    (A-B) Levels of mRNAs encoding stomatal bHLH transcription factor regulators, as determined by RT-qPCR, in (A) ag-10 stage 10–13 gynoecia relative to L-er stage 10–13 gynoecia, (B) dexamethasone-treated AG-amiRNAi (OPpro:AG-amiRNA/35Spro:GR-LhG4) in stage 10–13 gynoecia relative to mock-treated AG-amiRNAi in stage 10–13 gynoecia 24 h after treatments. Each dot in (A-B) represents the technical mean of an individual independent biological replicate. (C-E) Levels of (C) SPCH, (D) MUTE, and (E) FAMA mRNAs during gynoecium development as determined by RT-qPCR. Data for L-er is the same as in Fig 2I but was originally paired with the ag-10 experiments presented in this figure. Errors bars are s.e.m. of four independent biological replicates (F) Levels of SPCH, MUTE, FAMA, and AG mRNAs, as determined by RT-qPCR, in stage 13 gynoecia after treatment with dexamethasone relative to untreated (0 d) in stage 13 gynoecia. “Day after DEX” indicates the number of days that gynoecia were treated with DEX before being harvested at anthesis (stage 13), with “0 d” representing the untreated sample. “Stage at DEX” indicates the approximate stage of the flower/gynoecium when DEX treatment was applied. Error bars are s.e.m of three independent biological replicates. (G-J) Maximum intensity projections of stitched confocal laser scanning z-stack micrographs of (G, I) stage 12 and (H, J) stage 13 gynoecia from plants harboring a FAMApro:2xYFP transgene in (G-H) L-er and ag-10 backgrounds, and (I-J) the AG-amiRNAi (OPpro:AG-amiRNA/35Spro:GR-LhG4) background before treatment (0 h) and after dexamethasone treatment (48 h and 72 h). YFP is colored green and chlorophyll fluorescence is colored magenta. Scale bars for images of whole gynoecia are 100 μm. Scale bars for insets are 20 μm.</p

    Confocal imaging of AG-GFP in late-stage gynoecia.

    No full text
    (A-C) Maximum intensity projections of stitched confocal laser scanning z-stack micrographs of (A) early stage 12, (B) late stage 12, and (C) stage 13 gynoecia from AGpro:AG-GFP ag-1 plants. Arrowheads indicate accumulation of AG-GFP in the replum. Scale is 100 ÎĽm. (TIF)</p

    Sequences of probes used for gel shift assays.

    No full text
    In Arabidopsis thaliana, stomata are composed of two guard cells that control the aperture of a central pore to facilitate gas exchange between the plant and its environment, which is particularly important during photosynthesis. Although leaves are the primary photosynthetic organs of flowering plants, floral organs are also photosynthetically active. In the Brassicaceae, evidence suggests that silique photosynthesis is important for optimal seed oil content. A group of transcription factors containing MADS DNA binding domains is necessary and sufficient to confer floral organ identity. Elegant models, such as the ABCE model of flower development and the floral quartet model, have been instrumental in describing the molecular mechanisms by which these floral organ identity proteins govern flower development. However, we lack a complete understanding of how the floral organ identity genes interact with the underlying leaf development program. Here, we show that the MADS domain transcription factor AGAMOUS (AG) represses stomatal development on the gynoecial valves, so that maturation of stomatal complexes coincides with fertilization. We present evidence that this regulation by AG is mediated by direct transcriptional repression of a master regulator of the stomatal lineage, MUTE, and show data that suggests this interaction is conserved among several members of the Brassicaceae. This work extends our understanding of the mechanisms underlying floral organ formation and provides a framework to decipher the mechanisms that control floral organ photosynthesis.</div
    corecore