Who needs to be allocated in icu after thoracic surgery? An observational study

Background. The effective use of ICU care after lung resections has not been completely studied. The aims of this study were to identify predictive factors for effective use of ICU admission after lung resection and to develop a risk composite measure to predict its effective use. Methods. 120 adult patients undergoing elective lung resection were enrolled in an observational prospective cohort study. Preoperative evaluation and intraoperative assessment were recorded. In the postoperative period, patients were stratified into two groups according to the effective and ineffective use of ICU. The use of ICU care was considered effective if a patient experienced one or more of the following: maintenance of controlled ventilation or reintubationacute respiratory failurehemodynamic instability or shockand presence of intraoperative or postanesthesia complications. Results. Thirty patients met the criteria for effective use of ICU care. Logistic regression analysis identified three independent predictors of effective use of ICU care: surgery for bronchiectasis, pneumonectomy, and age >= 57 years. In the absence of any predictors the risk of effective need of ICU care was 6%. Risk increased to 25-30%, 66-71%, and 93% with the presence of one, two, or three predictors, respectively. Conclusion. ICU care is not routinely necessary for all patients undergoing lung resection.Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (Capes)Respiratory Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 04023-062 São Paulo, SP, BrazilRespiratory Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 04023-062 São Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for severe asthma described in a public health directive regulating the free distribution of medications for the maintenance treatment of asthma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the capacity of the criteria described in Complementary Directive SAS/MS 12, issued on November 12, 2002, to identify patients with severe asthma, describing and comparing clinical, functional and treatment data of such patients. METHODS: This was a nested case-control study using a structured database for adult asthma outpatients. We defined cases as asthma patients who met the inclusion criteria described in the directive, defining controls as those who did not. We collected and compared data related to the following: demographic characteristics; history of asthma; medications in use; comorbidities; history of tobacco use; number of exacerbations within the last 12 months, asthma-related hospitalizations and intensive care unit admissions within the last 12 months; spirometry; and sputum cytology. RESULTS: The case and control groups consisted of 29 and 31 patients, respectively. The number of asthma exacerbations and emergence room visits within the last 12 months, as well as the number of patients that received at least one pulse of oral corticosteroids, was significantly higher in the case group than in the control group. In addition, prebronchodilator FVC was lower among the cases than among the controls. Furthermore, cytology revealed that eosinophil counts were significantly higher in the induced sputum of cases than in that of controls. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria described in the directive are suited to stratifying patients with severe asthma.OBJETIVO: Avaliar a capacidade dos critérios descritos na Portaria Complementar SAS/MS nº12, de 12 de novembro de 2002, em identificar pacientes asmáticos graves, bem como descrever e comparar dados clínicos, funcionais e de tratamento destes pacientes. MÉTODOS: Estudo caso-controle aninhado em um banco de dados estruturado de atendimento ambulatorial de asmáticos. Foram considerados casos os pacientes asmáticos que preencheram os critérios de inclusão determinados na portaria e considerados controles os que não preencheram os mesmos critérios. Foram coletados e comparados dados demográficos; história pregressa da asma; medicamentos em uso; presença de comorbidades; história de tabagismo; presença, no último ano, de exacerbações, de hospitalizações e de admissões em unidades de terapia intensiva devido à asma; e resultados de espirometria e de citologia de escarro. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 29 e 31 pacientes, respectivamente, nos grupos caso e controle. O grupo caso apresentou maior número de exacerbações e maior número de visitas ao pronto-socorro no último ano, maior porcentagem de pacientes que receberam pelo menos um pulso de corticosteroide oral, assim como menores valores de CVF pré-broncodilatador em relação ao grupo controle. O grupo caso também apresentou um aumento significante de eosinófilos na citologia do escarro induzido. CONCLUSÕES: Os critérios de inclusão descritos na portaria são adequados para estratificar pacientes com asma grave.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de Medicina Programa de Pós-Graduação de PneumologiaUNIFESP, Depto. de Medicina Programa de Pós-Graduação de PneumologiaSciEL

Mortalidade, morbidade e categorização de risco para complicações perioperatórias em pacientes com câncer de pulmão

OBJECTIVE:To determine morbidity and mortality rates by risk category in accordance with the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, to determine what role pulmonary function tests play in this categorization process, and to identify risk factors for perioperative complications (PCs).METHODS:This was a historical cohort study based on preoperative and postoperative data collected for cases of lung cancer diagnosed or suspected between 2001 and 2010.RESULTS:Of the 239 patients evaluated, only 13 (5.4%) were classified as being at high risk of PCs. Predicted postoperative FEV1 (FEV1ppo) was sufficient to define the risk level in 156 patients (65.3%); however, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was necessary for identifying those at high risk. Lung resection was performed in 145 patients. Overall morbidity and mortality rates were similar to those reported in other studies. However, morbidity and mortality rates for patients at an acceptable risk of PCs were 31.6% and 4.3%, respectively, whereas those for patients at high risk were 83.3% and 33.3%. Advanced age, COPD, lobe resection, and lower FEV1ppo were correlated with PCs.CONCLUSIONS:Although spirometry was sufficient for risk assessment in the majority of the population studied, CPET played a key role in the identification of high-risk patients, among whom the mortality rate was seven times higher than was that observed for those at an acceptable risk of PCs. The risk factors related to PCs coincided with those reported in previous studies.OBJETIVO:Determinar as taxas de morbidade e mortalidade por categoria de risco conforme as diretrizes do American College of Chest Physicians, verificar como exames funcionais participaram dessa categorização e identificar fatores de risco para complicações perioperatórias (CPOs).MÉTODOS:Estudo de coorte histórica a partir de avaliações pré e pós-operatórias de casos diagnosticados ou suspeitos de câncer de pulmão avaliados entre 2001 e 2010.RESULTADOS:Dos 239 pacientes avaliados, apenas 13 (5,4%) foram considerados como de alto risco para CPOs. O cálculo do VEF1 previsto para o pós-operatório (VEF1ppo) foi suficiente para a estratificação do risco em 156 pacientes (65,3%); entretanto, o teste de exercício cardiopulmonar (TECP) foi necessário para a identificação de alto risco. Foram operados 145 pacientes, e as taxas globais de morbidade e mortalidade encontradas foram semelhantes às de outros estudos. Entretanto, as taxas de morbidade e mortalidade para aqueles com risco aceitável foram de 31,6% e 4,3%, respectivamente, enquanto as taxas para aqueles com alto risco foram de 83,3% e 33,3%. Idade mais avançada, presença da DPOC, ressecção de um ou mais lobos e VEF1ppo mais baixo estiveram relacionados à ocorrência de CPOs.CONCLUSÕES:Embora a espirometria tenha sido suficiente para a determinação de risco na maioria da população estudada, o TECP teve papel fundamental na identificação de pacientes com risco alto, que apresentaram uma taxa de mortalidade sete vezes maior que os de risco aceitável. Os fatores de risco relacionados a CPOs coincidiram aos relatados em outros estudos.Federal University of São Paulo Department of MedicineArnaldo Vieira de Carvalho Cancer InstituteUNIFESP, Department of MedicineSciEL

Study of vital capacity and respiratory rate and minute ventilation in the post-operative of elective craniotomy.

Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Pulm Rehabil Ctr, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Pulm Rehabil Ctr, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc