Refractive errors in infants with retinopathy of prematurity treated using laser or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy

Background: Infants treated for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) could develop visually significant refractive errors. In this study, we report pre-treatment refractive errors in premature infants with treatment-requiring ROP treated using laser or anti-VEGF monotherapy and compare the components of post-treatment refractive error values between the two treatment groups at different follow-up timepoints. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 360 eyes of 181 premature infants with treatment-requiring ROP who were referred to Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran between March 2020 and April 2021. Of the 360 eyes, 195 received laser monotherapy (laser treatment group) and 165 received an intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (anti-VEGF therapy group). All included eyes underwent pre- and post-treatment cycloplegic refraction. Cycloplegia was induced for each infant by instilling a mixed eye drop containing 1% tropicamide, 2.5% phenylephrine, and 0.5% tetracaine (in equal volumes) in each eye three times at five-minute intervals. Cycloplegic refraction was performed 30 minutes after the third instillation. Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW) of the infants were 29.0 (2.0) weeks and 1241.0 (403.0) g, respectively. The male-to-female ratio in the entire study cohort was 107 (59.1%) / 74 (40.9%), whereas the ratios in the anti-VEGF therapy group and laser treatment group were 47 (56.6%) / 36 (43.4%) and 60 (61.2%) / 38 (38.8%), respectively. The pre-treatment assessment revealed that 218 (60.6%) eyes were hyperopic, 112 (31.1%) were myopic, and 30 (8.3%) were emmetropic. In the anti-VEGF therapy group, 87 (52.7%) eyes were hyperopic, 63 (38.2%) were myopic, and 15 (9.1%) were emmetropic. In the laser treatment group, 131 (67.2%) eyes were hyperopic, 49 (25.1%) were myopic, and 15 (7.7%) were emmetropic. The mean (SD) spherical refractive error and spherical equivalent of refractive error (SEQ) at the 1-week, 1-month, and > 6-month post-treatment follow-up timepoints; the mean cylindrical refractive error at the 3-month post-treatment timepoint; and the mean SEQ at the time of ROP regression were significantly different between the treatment groups (all P < 0.05). The rate of anisometropia increased significantly from 3.4% at baseline to 9.2% at the 6-month post-treatment follow-up timepoint (P < 0.05). Conclusions: In this study, the most common pre-treatment refractive status of all included eyes with treatment-requiring ROP and eyes in each treatment group was hyperopia, followed by myopia and emmetropia. At the more than 6-month post-treatment follow-up, cycloplegic refraction revealed that the laser-treated eyes were significantly more hyperopic than the anti-VEGF-treated eyes, a finding similar to the pre-treatment refraction results. Further studies of same cohort with a longer follow-up period and a control group are needed to determine the real-world effect of each treatment modality on the refractive statuses of children treated for ROP

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Iran

Purpose: The present study aimed to evaluate the frequency and risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) among Iranian infants. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on infants who had undergone screening for ROP at Farabi Eye Hospital, between March 2016 and March 2017. Data were analyzed based on the presence of extreme prematurity (gestational age ≤ 28 weeks), extremely low-birth-weight (≤ 1000 g), and multiplegestation (MG) infants. Results: The prevalence of ROP was 27.28% (n = 543) among all screened infants, 74.4% for extremely preterm (EP) infants, 77.5% for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) babies, and 27.25% for infants from MG pregnancies. On multivariate analysis, gestational age, birth weight, and history of transfusion (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, and P = 0.04, respectively) were found to be significantly associated with ROP. More advanced stages of ROP (P < 0.0001) were observed in EP and ELBW infants. Birth weight (P = 0.088), history of transfusion (P = 0.066), and intubation (P = 0.053) were not associated with increased risk of ROP in EP infants, while gestational age (P = 0.037) and history of transfusion (P = 0.040) were significant risk factors for ROP in ELBW infants. Gestational age (P < 0.001) and birth weight (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with ROP in infants from MG pregnancies in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: ROP remains a commonly encountered disease, especially in ELBW and EP infants. The history of transfusion may have a role in stratifying the risk for ROP and guiding future screening guidelines

Validation of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) screening criteria

Background: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness in infants. The Postnatal Growth and ROP (G-ROP) study proposed new screening criteria for ROP. This study aimed to validate the G-ROP screening criteria in a group of Iranian premature infants who were treated in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for at least 40 days. Methods: In this retrospective study, we extracted the data pertaining to infants admitted to the NICU from January 2020 to December 2021. We screened all the included infants for ROP based on the Iranian national screening criteria. We applied the G-ROP criteria to our study population, and if no criterion was met, the infant was exempted from ROP screening. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the G-ROP guidelines for ROP detection, along with its capacity for predicting the requirement for ROP treatment. Moreover, we compared the G-ROP guidelines with the Iranian and North American guidelines for ROP screening. Results: A total of 166 premature infants with complete datasets were included: 130 had ROP, of whom 61 were treated. There were 109 female infants (65.7%). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) birth weight and gestational age were 1080 (256) g and 28.28 (1.97) weeks, respectively. Applying the G-ROP criteria, 127 of 130 infants with ROP were identified (sensitivity, 97.69%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 95.11% – 100%), and of 36 infants without ROP, three were correctly excluded (specificity, 8.33%; 95% CI, 0% – 17.36%). The G-ROP criteria did not fail to identify infants who required treatment for ROP (sensitivity, 100%; 95% CI, 98.29 – 100) and had a specificity of 8.69% (95% CI, 2.04% – 15.34%). Although the Iranian and North American criteria had 100% sensitivity for infants with any stage of ROP, they could not detect infants without ROP (0% specificity). Conclusions: The G-ROP screening criteria had a sensitivity of 100% in identifying infants requiring treatment for ROP in our high-risk group; however, specificity was not sufficiently high. Further studies with larger numbers of referred infants could confirm a decrease in the burden of retinal examinations using these criteria

Prevalence and risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) refers to the developmental disorder of the retina in premature infants and is one of the most serious and most dangerous complications in premature infants. The prevalence of ROP in Iran is different in various parts of Iran and its prevalence is reported to be 1–70% in different regions. This study aims to determine the prevalence and risk factors of ROP in Iran. Methods This review article was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocols. To find literature about ROP in Iran, a comprehensive search was done using MeSH keywords in several online databases such as PubMed, Ovid, Science Direct, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, EBSCO, Magiran, Iranmedex, SID, Medlib, IranDoc, as well as the Google Scholar search engine until May 2017. Comprehensive Meta-analysis Software (CMA) Version 2 was used for data analysis. Results According to 42 studies including 18,000 premature infants, the prevalence of ROP was reported to be 23.5% (95% CI: 20.4–26.8) in Iran. The prevalence of ROP stages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 was 7.9% (95% CI: 5.3–11.5), 9.7% (95% CI: 6.1–15.3), 2.8% (95% CI: 1.6–4.9), 2.9% (95% CI: 1.9–4.5) and 3.6% (95% CI: 2.4–5.2), respectively. The prevalence of ROP in Iranian girls and boys premature infants was 18.3% (95% CI: 12.8–25.4) and 18.9% (95% CI: 11.9–28.5), respectively. The lowest prevalence of ROP was in the West of Iran (12.3% [95% CI: 7.6–19.1]), while the highest prevalence was associated with the Center of Iran (24.9% [95% CI: 21.8–28.4]). The prevalence of ROP is increasing according to the year of study, and this relationship is not significant (p = 0.181). The significant risk factors for ROP were small gestational age (p < 0.001), low birth weight (p < 0.001), septicemia (p = 0.021), respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.036), intraventricular hemorrhage (p = 0.005), continuous positive pressure ventilation (p = 0.023), saturation above 50% (p = 0.023), apnea (p = 0.002), frequency and duration of blood transfusion, oxygen therapy and phototherapy (p < 0.05), whereas pre-eclampsia decreased the prevalence of ROP (p = 0.014). Conclusion Considering the high prevalence of ROP in Iran, screening and close supervision by experienced ophthalmologists to diagnose and treat the common complications of pre-maturity and prevent visual impairment or blindness is necessary

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Retinopathy of Prematurity in Preterm Neonates

Background: The most common cause of preventable blindness in children is retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The most important risk factors for this disease are preterm delivery and low birth weight (LBW). This research was performed to evaluate the prevalence ofand risk factors for ROP in preterm neonates. Methods: Our research was a cross-sectional descriptive and retrospective study conducted on preterm neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Mahdieh Hospital in Tehran, Iran, in 2015. All neonates with a gestational age of < 32 weeks and birth weight of < 1,500 g were enrolled. Demographic data and risk factors for ROP were evaluated. Statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS (version 20) with a 95% confidence interval and. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Our study was conducted on 154 patients. Mean gestational age and birth weight of the newborns were 28.69±1.82 weeks (range: 23-32 weeks) and 1114.94±240.982 g (range: 550-1500 g). The ROP was detected in 76 (49.4%) patients, 55.26%, 34.2%, and 10.53% of whom had stages I, II, and III of ROP. Stages IV and V were not seen in our patients. The incidence of ROP was significantly affected by low gestational age and birth weight, delivery room resuscitation, prolonged oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation, and repeated packed cell transfusion. Conclusion: Despite the improvement in the care of preterm infants in the NICUs, the prevalence rate of ROP was high. Therefore, it is critical to adopt better care for disease prevention, timely screening, and appropriate treatment programs for the neonates who are at the risk of this disease