Measurement of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load using a novel quantification standard containing two EBV DNA targets and SYBR Green I dye

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection may cause serious, life-threatening complications in immunocompromised individuals. EBV DNA is often detected in EBV-associated disease states, with viral load believed to be a reflection of virus activity. Two separate real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) assays using SYBR Green I dye and a single quantification standard containing two EBV genes, Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1) and BamHI fragment H rightward open reading frame-1 (BHRF-1), were developed to detect and measure absolute EBV DNA load in patients with various EBV-associated diseases. EBV DNA loads and viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG antibody titres were also quantified on a population sample.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>EBV DNA was measurable in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. EBV DNA loads were detectable from 8.0 × 10²to 1.3 × 10⁸copies/ml in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (n = 5), 1.5 × 10³to 2.0 × 10⁵copies/ml in infectious mononucleosis (n = 7), 7.5 × 10⁴to 1.1 × 10⁵copies/ml in EBV-associated haemophagocytic syndrome (n = 1), 2.0 × 10²to 5.6 × 10³copies/ml in HIV-infected patients (n = 12), and 2.0 × 10²to 9.1 × 10⁴copies/ml in the population sample (n = 218). EBNA-1 and BHRF-1 DNA were detected in 11.0% and 21.6% of the population sample respectively. There was a modest correlation between VCA IgG antibody titre and BHRF-1 DNA load (rho = 0.13, p = 0.05) but not EBNA-1 DNA load (rho = 0.11, p = 0.11).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Two sensitive and specific real-time PCR assays using SYBR Green I dye and a single quantification standard containing two EBV DNA targets, were developed for the detection and measurement of EBV DNA load in a variety of clinical samples. These assays have application in the investigation of EBV-related illnesses in immunocompromised individuals.</p

A prospective study of changes in anxiety, depression, and problems in living during chemotherapy treatments: effects of age and gender

PurposeMonitoring distress assessment in cancer patients during the treatment phase is a component of good quality care practice. Yet, there is a dearth of prospective studies examining distress. In an attempt to begin filling this gap and inform clinical practice, we conducted a prospective, longitudinal study examining changes in distress (anxiety, depression, and problems in living) by age and gender and the roles of age and gender in predicting distress.MethodsNewly diagnosed Brazilian cancer patients (N = 548) were assessed at three time points during chemotherapy. Age and gender were identified on the first day of chemotherapy (T1); anxiety, depression, and problems in living were self-reported at T1, the planned midway point (T2), and the last day of chemotherapy (T3).ResultsAt T1, 37 and 17% of patients reported clinically significant levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. At T3, the prevalence was reduced to 4.6% for anxiety and 5.1% for depression (p &lt; .001). Patients 40-55 years, across all time points, reported greater anxiety and practical problems than patients &gt;70 years (p &lt; .03). Female patients reported greater emotional, physical, and family problems than their male counterparts (p &lt; .04).ConclusionsFor most patients, elevated levels of distress noted in the beginning of treatment subsided by the time of treatment completion. However, middle-aged and female patients continued to report heightened distress. Evidence-based psychosocial intervention offered to at risk patients during early phases of the treatment may provide distress relief and improve outcomes over the illness trajectory while preventing psychosocial and physical morbidity due to untreated chronic distress

The role of behavioural modification and exercise in the management of cancer-related fatigue to reduce its impact during and after cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a symptom that can occur during treatment as an acute side effect but can also result in persistent fatigue as a long-term side effect or late effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a narrative review of the current literature and discuss the current evidence of assessment of fatigue and we specifically focus on the role of promoting behavioural change and focused rehabilitation to minimise these long-term effects and update the literature relating to this area from 2012 to date. RESULTS: We suggest there are behavioural change models that can be scaled up to enable patients to manage long-term fatigue using exercise. However, from this updated review there are limitations to the current infrastructure and evidence base that will impact on the ability to do this. CONCLUSION: We continually need to raise awareness amongst health professionals to continue to suggest modifications to impact on fatigue at all stages of cancer treatment and into survivorship and late effects. These can range from simple brief interventions suggested in the clinic to full scale rehabilitation programmes if the correct infrastructure is available. Whichever approach is adopted we suggest exercise will be the mainstay of the treatment of fatigue in this group