Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues

BACKGROUND: To determine factors influencing the clearance of fragments after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower pole calyceal (LPC) stones. METHODS: In the period between July 1998 and Oct 2001, 100 patients with isolated lower polar calyceal calculi ≤ 20 mm, in patients aged ≥ 14 years, were included in the study. Intravenous urograms (IVU) were reviewed to define the LPC anatomy (width of the infundibulum and pelvicalyceal angle). Study end points i.e. stone free status; number of shock waves used and number of sessions were correlated with variables like LPC anatomy, body mass index and stone size. RESULTS: At three months follow up the clearance for stone size ≤ 10 mm, 11–15 mm and 16–20 mm were 95, 96 and 90% respectively. Patients with acute LPC (<90°) and obtuse angle (>90°) had stone clearance of 94 and 100% respectively. For the infundibular width of < 4 mm, the stone clearance was 93% were as for > 4 mm, it was 100%. For body mass index (BMI) less than and > 30 kg/m(2), the stone clearance was 92 and 95% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend towards more ESWL sessions and shock wave requirement in patients with acute pelvi-calyceal angle and narrow infundibulum but it is not statistically significant. Size (≤ 20 mm) and BMI has no relation with stone clearance. With modern lithotripter, stones up to 20 mm could primarily be treated by ESWL, irrespective of an un-favorable lower polar calyceal anatomy and body habitus

Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on upper tract urothelial carcinoma 2016: treatment of low-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Introduction The conservative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has historically been offered to patients with imperative indications. The recent International Consultation on Urologic Diseases (ICUD) publication on UTUC stratified treatment allocations based on high- and low-risk groups. This report updates the conservative management of the low-risk group. Methods The ICUD for low-risk UTUC working group performed a thorough review of the literature with an assessment of the level of evidence and grade of recommendation for a variety of published studies in this disease space. We update these publications and provide a summary of that original report. Results There are no prospective randomized controlled studies to support surgical management guidelines. A risk-stratified approach based on clinical, endoscopic, and biopsy assessment allows selection of patients who could benefit from kidney-preserving procedures with oncological outcomes potentially similar to radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision, with the added benefit of renal function preservation. These treatments are aided by the development of high-definition flexible digital URS, multi-biopsies with the aid of access sheaths and other tools, and promising developments in the use of adjuvant topical therapy. Conclusions Recent developments in imaging, minimally invasive techniques, multimodality approaches, and adjuvant topical regimens and bladder cancer prevention raise the hope for improved risk stratification and may greatly improve the endoscopic treatment for low-risk UTUC

Predictors of morbidity in patients with indwelling ureteric stents: results of a prospective study using the validated Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaire

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictors of morbidity in patients with indwelling ureteric stents using a validated questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six consecutive patients with indwelling double-J ureteric stent of different length and size enrolled at an Italian tertiary academic centre were prospectively evaluated with the Italian-validated Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ), which explores the stent-related symptoms in six domains. Ureteric stents were placed for benign ureteric obstruction or after uncomplicated ureterorenoscopy, and were all removed after 28 days. The questionnaire was administered on days 7 and 28 after stent placement and on day 28 after removal. A plain abdominal X-ray was performed on days 7 and 28 after placement to determine stent location. Univariable and multivariable analyses tested the association of patient age, sex and body mass index (BMI), and stent side, length, calibre and distal loop location, with the index score of the various domains on days 7 and 28. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. At multivariable analysis, on day 7, sex, BMI and stent calibre were significantly associated with one domain (general health, body pain and work performance, respectively), while location of stent distal loop was significantly associated with five domains (urinary symptoms, body pain, general health, work performanc, and sexual matters). On day 28, body mass index was significantly associated with two domains (body pain and general health), while location of stent distal loop remained significantly associated with the same five domains (urinary symptoms, body pain, general health, work performance and sexual matters). CONCLUSION: Location of stent distal loop with respect to midline had the strongest association with most domains of the USSQ on both days 7 and 28 after stent placement. The visualization of stent distal loop crossing the midline may therefore identify patients at higher risk of post-procedural morbidity requiring early management