Preferential Th1 profile of T helper cell responses in X-linked (Bruton's) agammaglobulinemia

X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) is a primary immunodeficiency of the B-cell compartment caused by a defective gene encoding for the tyrosine kinase (btk) essential for B cell differentiation. Affected males undergo recurrent pyogenic infections and deficient immunoglobulin production. Peripheral blood T cells from 6 XLA patients and 6 matched healthy controls were stimulated with either PHA or tetanus toroid (TT) and T cell clones obtained were compared for their cytokine profile. In the series of PHA-induced or rr-specific CD4(+) T cell clones derived from XLA patients, the Th1 profile was predominant (63 and 65%, respectively). Upon stimulation with TT, the proportion of activated T cells from XLA that expressed the IFN-gamma -associated LAG-3 activation molecule was higher than in control T cells (51 vs. 25%), whereas the expression of the IL-4-associated CD30 molecule was lower (5 vs. 21%). in a cohort of 31 XLA patients, plasma levels of soluble (s)LAG-3 and sCD30, chosen as indirect indicators of the Th1/Th2 activity in vivo, were significantly higher and lower, respectively, than those measured in 31 healthy controls. Likewise, plasma levels of interferon-inducible protein 10 and of macrophage-derived chemokine in XLA patients were significantly higher and lower, respectively,than in healthy controls

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtypes on virologic response and emergence of drug resistance among children in the Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA) 5 trial

The association between virologic response and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtype was investigated in 113 HIV-1-infected children randomly assigned to receive zidovudine plus lamivudine, zidovudine plus abacavir, or lamivudine plus abacavir in the Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA) 5 trial. Symptomatic children (n = 68) also received nelfinavir; asymptomatic children (n = 45) were randomly assigned to receive nelfinavir or placebo. HIV-1 subtypes A, B, C, D, F, G, H, A/E, and A/G were found in 15%, 41%, 16%, 9%, 5%, 2%, 1%, 5%, and 7% of the children, respectively. Resistance assay failure rates were higher for non-B subtypes than for B subtypes (genotype, P = .01; phenotype, P = .02). HIV-1 subtype was not associated with virologic response at 24 and 48 weeks after initiation of treatment. No differences were observed in the frequency of development of resistance mutations L90M (P = 1.00) and D30N (P = .61) in B and non-B viruses. In conclusion, no evidence that subtype determined virologic response to therapy was found

Comparison of dual nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor regimens with HIV-1 who have not previously been treated: the PENTA 5 randomized trial

Introduction Treatment options for children with HIV-1 are limited. We aimed to compare activity and safety of three dualnucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimens with or without a protease inhibitor in previously untreated children with HIV-1. Methods In our multicentre trial, we randomly assigned 36 children to zidovudine and lamivudine, 45 to zidovudine and abacavir, and 47 to lamivudine and abacavir. Children who were symptomfree (n=55) were also randomly assigned to receive nelfinavir or placebo. Children with more advanced disease received open-label nelfinavir (73). Primary endpoints were change in plasma HIV-1 RNA at 24 and 48 weeks for the NRTI comparison and occurrence of serious adverse events for both randomised comparisons. Analyses were by intention to treat. Findings Children had a median CD4 percentage of 22% (IQR 15–29) and a mean HIV-1 RNA concentration of 5·0 log copies/mL (SD 0·8). One child was lost to follow-up and one died of sepsis. At 48 weeks, in the zidovudine/lamivudine, zidovudine/abacavir, and lamivudine/abacavir groups, mean HIV-1 RNA had decreased by 1·71, 2·19, and 2·63 log copies/mL, respectively (estimated in absence of nelfinavir) (p=0·02 after adjustment for baseline factors). One child had a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir; and three with possible reactions stopped abacavir. There were 24 serious adverse events—six in the symptom-free children (all on nelfinavir), but none were attributed to nelfinavir. Interpretation Regimens containing abacavir were more effective than zidovudine/lamivudine. Such regimens could be combined with protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for safe and effective treatment of previously untreated children with HIV-1