41 research outputs found
A justification of whistleblowing
Penultimate version accepted for publicationWhistleblowing is the act of disclosing information from a public or private organization in order to reveal cases of corruption that are of immediate or potential danger to the public. Blowing the whistle involves personal risk, especially when legal protection is absent, and charges of betrayal, which often come in the form of legal prosecution under treason laws. In this article we argue that whistleblowing is justified when disclosures are made with the proper intent and fulfill specific communicative constraints in addressing issues of public interest. Three communicative constraints of informativeness, truthfulness and evidence are discussed in this regard. We develop a ‘harm test’ to assess the intent for disclosures, concluding that it is not sufficient for justification. Along with the proper intent, a successful act of whistleblowing should provide information that serves the public interest. Taking cognizance of the varied conceptions of public interest, we present an account of public interest that fits the framework of whistleblowing disclosures. In particular, we argue that whistleblowing is justified inter alia when the information it conveys is of a presumptive interest for a public insofar as it reveals an instance of injustice or violation of a civil or political right done against and unbeknown to some members of a polity.Project: ‘Change of Direction. Fostering Whistleblowing in the Fight against Corruption’ co-funded by the Internal Security Fund of the European Union (Grant Agreement Number: HOME/2014/ISFP/AG/EFCE/7233); SFRH/BPD/108669/2015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Toward a Liberalism
In Toward a Liberalism, Richard Flathman shows why and how political theory can contribute to the quality of moral and political practice without violating, as empiricist- and idealist-based theories tend to do, liberal commitments to individuality and plurality. Exploring the tense but inevitable relationship between liberalism and authority, he advances a theory of democratic citizenship tempered by appreciation of the ways in which citizenship is implicated with and augments authority. Flathman examines the relationship of individual rights to freedom on one hand and to authority and power on the other, rejecting the quest for a single homogenous and authoritative liberal theory
Toward a Liberalism
In Toward a Liberalism, Richard Flathman shows why and how political theory can contribute to the quality of moral and political practice without violating, as empiricist- and idealist-based theories tend to do, liberal commitments to individuality and plurality. Exploring the tense but inevitable relationship between liberalism and authority, he advances a theory of democratic citizenship tempered by appreciation of the ways in which citizenship is implicated with and augments authority. Flathman examines the relationship of individual rights to freedom on one hand and to authority and power on the other, rejecting the quest for a single homogenous and authoritative liberal theory
From Contract to Community: Political Theory at the Crossroads. Edited by Fred R. Dallmayr. (New York: Marcel Dreker, 1978. Pp. xii + 172. $19.50.)
Liberalism without Illusions: Essays on Liberal Theory and the Political Vision of Judith N. Shklar. Edited by Bernard Yack. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. 292p. 16.95 paper.
A Matter of Principle. By Ronald Dworkin. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985. Pp. 425. $25.00.)
The Shotgun Behind the Door: Liberalism and the Problem of Political Obligation. By Philip Abbott. (Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1976. Pp. xv + 206. $8.00.)
Representations in American Politics. Edited by Frederick M. Dolan and Thomas L. Dumm. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1993. 296p. 16.95 paper. - Republic of Signs: Liberal Theory and American Popular Culture. By Anne Norton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.195p. 12.95 paper.
Nomos VII: Rational Decision. Edited by Carl J. Friedrich. (New York: Atherton Press, 1964. Pp. viii, 228. $6.50).
Constructing equal and vigorous citizens : the role of legislative politics
This paper proposes a ‘constitutional’ alternative to the current conflict between Palestinians and Israelis. Through an engagement with a particular branch of liberal political theory – Richard Flathman’s ‘wilful liberalism’ – the paper proposes how strengthening legislatures rather than relying on judiciaries is central to the conflict. This proposal seeks to ensure that the nature of equality is protected in the region by encouraging citizens to be more actively engaged in their political lives through the creation of robust legislatures. Rather than seek to reinforce the existing legislative structures alone, however, the paper proposes how a transnational legislative structure might not only protect and empower individuals it might also help to lessen the conflict in the region. The paper is largely one of constitutional theory rather than empirical detail, though by setting out this alternative, it hopes to contribute to those seeking alternatives to the currently stalemated conflic