Towards the “ultimate earthquake-proof” building: Development of an integrated low-damage system

The 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence has highlighted the severe mismatch between societal expectations over the reality of seismic performance of modern buildings. A paradigm shift in performance-based design criteria and objectives towards damage-control or low-damage design philosophy and technologies is urgently required. The increased awareness by the general public, tenants, building owners, territorial authorities as well as (re)insurers, of the severe socio-economic impacts of moderate-strong earthquakes in terms of damage/dollars/ downtime, has indeed stimulated and facilitated the wider acceptance and implementation of cost-efficient damage-control (or low-damage) technologies. The ‘bar’ has been raised significantly with the request to fast-track the development of what the wider general public would hope, and somehow expect, to live in, i.e. an “earthquake-proof” building system, capable of sustaining the shaking of a severe earthquake basically unscathed. The paper provides an overview of recent advances through extensive research, carried out at the University of Canterbury in the past decade towards the development of a low-damage building system as a whole, within an integrated performance-based framework, including the skeleton of the superstructure, the non-structural components and the interaction with the soil/foundation system. Examples of real on site-applications of such technology in New Zealand, using concrete, timber (engineered wood), steel or a combination of these materials, and featuring some of the latest innovative technical solutions developed in the laboratory are presented as examples of successful transfer of performance-based seismic design approach and advanced technology from theory to practice

Experimental study on seismic performance of strap-braced cold-formed steel shear walls

This paper presents a detailed investigation of the lateral performance of X-strap braced cold-formed steel shear walls and their response modification factor, R. Four full-scale 2.4 × 2.4 m specimens with different configurations were tested, and their responses recorded under a standard cyclic loading regime. Of particular interest were the specimens' maximum lateral load capacity and deformation behaviour as well as a rational estimation of the seismic response modification factor. The study also looks at the failure modes of the system and investigates the main factors contributing to the ductile response of the cold formed steel (CFS) shear walls in order to suggest improvements so that the shear steel walls respond plastically with a significant drift and without any risk of brittle failure, such as connection failure or stud buckling. The walls tested have different number of strap elements with different angles, and brackets. The study shows that the performance of this kind of CFS lateral resistant system under cyclic loads is satisfactory; and can be considered reliable. A discussion on the calculated response factors in comparison to those suggested in the relevant codes of practice is also presented

Seismic design of yielding structures on flexible foundations

This paper introduces a simple method to consider the effects of inertial soil-structure interaction (SSI) on the seismic demands of a yielding single-degree-of-freedom structure. This involves idealizing the yielding soil-structure system as an effective substitute oscillator having a modified period, damping ratio, and ductility. A parametric study is conducted to obtain the ratio between the displacement ductility demand of a flexible-base system and that of the corresponding fixed-base system. It is shown that while additional foundation damping can reduce the overall response, the effects of SSI may also increase the ductility demand of some structures, mostly being ductile and having large structural aspect ratio, up to 15%. Finally, a design procedure is provided for incorporation of the SSI effects on structural response. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd