Assessing the agronomic value of hog manure-derived struvite as a phosphorus source for spring wheat

Non-Peer ReviewedRecovery of phosphorus (P) from liquid hog manure is one option for minimizing P loss from hog operations to surface water bodies, where it can cause eutrophication. The P, recovered as magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate (MgNH4PO4∙6H2O), commonly known as struvite, has slow-release properties, which could improve P use efficiency in cropping systems. This greenhouse bioassay evaluated the effectiveness of struvite as a P source for spring wheat. Struvite, monoammonium phosphate (MAP), and polymer-coated monoammonium phosphate (CMAP) were applied at rates of 25 and 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 either in the seed-row or in a side-band in the first of three crop cycles. Results for Cycle 1 indicated no significant P source, rate, application method, and soil main effects on aboveground wheat dry matter yield (DMY). Phosphorus uptake (PU) in Cycle 1, averaged across soils, rates, and applications methods, was significantly greater with MAP (5.1 mg kg-1) and CMAP (4.9 mg kg-1) than with struvite (4.1 mg kg-1) application. Similarly, P uptake efficiency (PUE) was greater for MAP (21%) and CMAP (18%) than for struvite (12%). For the second and third crop cycles in which wheat followed canola, DMY, PU, and PUE were similar for the P sources, regardless of rate, placement, or soil. These results suggest that while struvite was as good as the commercial P fertilizers with respect to DMY and, in Cycles 2 and 3, PU and PUE, it did not exhibit the beneficial residual effects that typically characterize slow release fertilizers. Nonetheless, it is encouraging to note that the unrefined struvite, which is a by-product of manure management for environmental goals, can perform as well as commercial fertilizers that are optimized for agronomic performance

The consequences of niche and physiological differentiation of archaeal and bacterial ammonia oxidisers for nitrous oxide emissions

The authors are members of the Nitrous Oxide Research Alliance (NORA), a Marie Skłodowska-Curie ITN and research project under the EU's seventh framework program (FP7). GN is funded by the AXA Research Fund and CGR by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (UF150571) and a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Standard Grant (NE/K016342/1). The authors would like to thank Dr Robin Walker and the SRUC Craibstone Estate (Aberdeen) for access to the agricultural plots, Dr Alex Douglas for statistical advice and Philipp Schleusner for assisting microcosm construction and sampling.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

The effect of industrial effluent and leachate from landfills on the levels of selected trace heavy metals in the waters of Upper and middle Mukuvisi river in Harare, Zimbabwe

Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 1993, 7(1) 1-10. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 1993, 7(1) 1-10 Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 1993, 7(1) 1-1

Vegetation Response to a One-Time Spent Drilling Mud Application to Semiarid, Mixed-Grass Prairie

Landspraying while drilling (LWD) is an approved disposal method for water-based drilling mud (WBM) systems in western Canada. The mud is applied either on cultivated land, where it is incorporated by cultivation, or on vegetated land where it is not incorporated. This study examined the effects of summer WBM application (0, 15, 20, 40, and 80 m3 ha-1) on native vegetation properties. Our results indicated that LWD increased bare ground but decreased lichen cover at the 80 m3 ha-1 rate relative to the untreated control. Nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), and magnesium (Mg) concentrations in aboveground plant tissue increased with increasing LWD rate in samples taken 45 d after WBM application, but these differences disappeared 1 yr after treatment. Increase in tissue concentration of phosphorus (P) with LWD rate, however, was only detected 3 yr after LWD. Nonetheless, these changes in tissue chemistry were not associated with significant changes in biomass yield or species composition. Overall, our results suggest that single WBM applications at rates (< 20 m3 ha-1) commonly used in western Canada, if properly managed, are unlikely to adversely affect native prairie vegetation.The Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact [email protected] for further information.Migrated from OJS platform August 202

Vegetation Response to a One-Time Spent Drilling Mud Application to Semiarid, Mixed-Grass Prairie

Landspraying while drilling (LWD) is an approved disposal method for water-based drilling mud (WBM) systems in western Canada. The mud is applied either on cultivated land, where it is incorporated by cultivation, or on vegetated land where it is not incorporated. This study examined the effects of summer WBM application (0, 15, 20, 40, and 80 m3 ha-1) on native vegetation properties. Our results indicated that LWD increased bare ground but decreased lichen cover at the 80 m3 ha-1 rate relative to the untreated control. Nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), and magnesium (Mg) concentrations in aboveground plant tissue increased with increasing LWD rate in samples taken 45 d after WBM application, but these differences disappeared 1 yr after treatment. Increase in tissue concentration of phosphorus (P) with LWD rate, however, was only detected 3 yr after LWD. Nonetheless, these changes in tissue chemistry were not associated with significant changes in biomass yield or species composition. Overall, our results suggest that single WBM applications at rates (< 20 m3 ha-1) commonly used in western Canada, if properly managed, are unlikely to adversely affect native prairie vegetation.The Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact [email protected] for further information.Migrated from OJS platform August 202