Extensively drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens in the neurocritical intensive care unit

Background: Abrupt increase of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant bacteria may complicate the course, management, and costs of neurocritical patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. No data exists regarding risk factors for colonization by gram-negative pathogens in neurocritical patients. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors associated with colonization by multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in neurocritical patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a neurointensive care unit over a period of 3\ua0years. We included adult neurocritical patients admitted for more than 48\ua0h. We analyzed several factors including both anamnestic factors and admission diagnosis. Results: Four hundred twenty neurocritical patients were retrospectively enrolled. Seventy-three patients developed colonization by multidrug-resistant and 53 by extensively drug-resistant gram negative pathogens. Logistic regression identified intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) as the strongest predictor for both multidrug-resistant (AUC 0.877; 95% CI 0.841\u20130.913) and extensively drug-resistant (AUC 0.839 0.787\u20130.892) gram negative pathogens. In addition, external ventricular drainage and intracerebral pressure monitoring catheter were risk factors for XDR. Survival analysis revealed that MDR bacteria colonization happens earlier (log-rank test p\ua0= 0.017). Conclusions: Optimization of healthcare strategies is required in order to reduce patients\u2019 length of stay to prevent multi- and extensively-drug gram-negative colonizations. Indeed, an early external ventricular drainage and intracerebral pressure monitoring catheter removal is deemed necessary as soon as clinically appropriate

Intralesional Methotrexate for the Treatment of Advanced Keratinocytic Tumors: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study

Introduction: Keratinocyte tumors (KT) are frequently observed. Surgery is the treatment gold standard. In some cases, a surgical approach might not be the best option. Radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments can frequently cause side effects or be contraindicated. Intralesional methotrexate (MTX) can be a conservative yet effective alternative. We decided to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intralesional chemotherapy with MTX for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), keratoacanthoma (KA), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Methods: All patients had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of BCC, SCC, or KA and no indication to surgery or RT. MTX was injected subcutaneously proceeding from the periphery of the lesion toward the center. Different protocols in terms of dose, frequency, and length of treatment were used to compare them. Treatment efficacy was evaluated in terms of tumor size reduction. Patients were divided into three groups: responders (improvement of more than 50%), partial responders (< 50%), and non-responders (no improvement or worsening). All data were analyzed using the chi-squared test (χ2). Results: Thirty-five patients were included. Twenty-one patients suffered from SCC, 12 from KA, and 2 from BCC. KA showed a higher response rate than SCC and BCC. For AK, 92% of patients had a complete resolution; 8% were partial responders. For SCC, 47.6% of cases were responders and 14.3% partial responders, while 38% non-responders. All BCCs showed no improvement. A treatment protocol of weekly injections, performed for 4 to 6 weeks, was the most efficient. Doses of 25 mg/ml per session seemed to be most effective. About one third of our patients developed side effects with mild anemia being the most frequent. Conclusions: For selected cases, intralesional MTX can be a safe and effective option for the treatment of KT, especially in case of KA and, to a lesser extent, SCC

When basal cell carcinomas became giant: an Italian multicenter study

Background: Giant basal cell carcinoma (GBCC) is a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) enlarged in a diameter more than 5&nbsp;cm. Since GBCCs are a highly infrequent entity and the occurrence rate is approximately 0.5–1% out of all BCC types, only anecdotal cases are reported, and causes and characteristics inducing development of this tumor are not defined. Objectives: Evaluate causative factors and clinico-histological characteristics of GBCCs. Methods: The study is a 6-month, hospital-based case series study performed in 12 Italian dermatologic centers. Results: A total of 59 cases and 458 control BCCs were collected. No significant differences existed between the two groups if we take into account social or cultural factors. The average duration of GBCCs is considerably longer than controls. GBCCs are located on unexposed areas while BCCs are on areas not usually covered by clothes. Superficial histological subtype was more frequent in the BCCs group, while infiltrative in GBCCs. GBCCs showed significantly higher local invasiveness, and greater metastatic capacity. More than half of GBCCs had been previously treated with one or more treatments. Conclusions: Patients with GBCCs appear to belong to two categories: (i) those who present with GBCC due to delay in accessing medical attention, and (ii) those who have BCCs previously treated with inappropriate strategies. Only very few cases can be carried out with intrinsic biological features of tumor aggressiveness. Social and cultural conditions do not appear to be involved in the development of GBCCS. These observations may help clinicians in selecting correct therapeutic strategies in the treatment of BCCs, which give rise to GBCC

Child toy safety: An interdisciplinary approach to unravel the microbiological hazard posed by soap bubbles

In 2012 some children developed sepsis after playing together with a soap bubble toy. Microbiological testing revealed heavy contamination of the soap solution, which reasonably represented the vehicle of infection. We investigated the issue with a multidisciplinary approach: review of toy safety legislation; microbiological testing of additional samples; query of the RAPEX database for noncompliant soap bubbles; identification of major manufacturing districts. Microbiological contamination of industrial soap bubbles was widespread. Sixty-three notifications of batches contaminated by environmental microorganisms and opportunistic pathogens had been reported. The Chinese had a virtual monopoly of the soap bubble market. We identified two main manufacturing districts in Guangdong Province, both notable for degradation of their water resources. The use of untreated water for the industrial production of soap bubbles may explain the bacterial contamination. Existing legislation provides an unsatisfactory approach for managing microbiological hazards in sensitive toy categories and for identifying responsible parties in import and export of the products