Données épidémiologiques dans le monde et traitements disponibles du VHB

Date du colloque&nbsp;: 09/2008</p

Traitement des hépatites B, C, D

Les hépatites virales sont un problème majeur de santé publique au niveau international. Environ 2 milliards de sujets dans le monde ont été en contact avec le VHB, soit qu\u27ils aient une infection, soit qu\u27ils aient éliminé partiellement le virus [1]. Quatre cents millions d\u27individus sont porteurs chroniques d\u27une infection par le virus de l\u27hépatite B (VHB) et parmi ceux-ci, environ à 15 millions sont co-infectés par un virus satellite du virus de l\u27hépatite B appelé le virus de l\u27hépatite Delta (VHD).Dans le monde, près de 200 millions de sujets sont également infectés par le virus de l\u27hépatite C [2]. Les chiffres concernant la mortalité et la morbidité globale de ces infections sont partiellement connus. L\u27OMS estime qu\u27environ 2 millions de décès par an sont dus aux infections par les virus des hépatites C (http://www.who.int/fr/). On sait également que les patients porteurs d\u27une infection chronique ont un risque majeur d\u27évoluer vers la cirrhose du foie et le carcinome hépato-cellulaire (le risque serait de 200 par rapport à un sujet non infecté [3, 4] ). Dans les pays développés, les hépatites B et C sont également responsables d\u27une grande partie des transplantations hépatiques [1] . L\u27objectif de cette revue est de faire le point sur le traitement des hépatites B, C et Delta en envisageant les schémas thérapeutiques les plus adaptés à l\u27Afrique. Nous aborderons d\u27abord le traitement des hépatites B, le traitement des co-infections B-Delta, le traitement des hépatites B chez les patients VIH puis le traitement des hépatites C et celui des hépatites C chez les patients vivant avec le VIH

Intérêt des nouvelles mesures de la charge virale dans le suivi des patients VHC traités

Date du colloque&nbsp;: 06/2008</p

Systemic diseases and biotherapies: Understanding, evaluating, and preventing the risk of hepatitis B reactivation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can occur in chronic carriers of the HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and constitutes a well-known complication of immunosuppressive therapy. HBV reactivation has also been reported after contact with the HBV. The increasing use of biological agents (TNFα antagonists, rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab) to treat systemic diseases has resulted in numerous publications about the risk of HBV reactivation. The relevant scientific societies have issued recommendations designed to prevent HBV reactivation. The main measures consist of screening for markers indicating chronic HBV infection (HBsAg) or HBV infection in the distant past (antibodies to the HBV core antigen) before initiating biological therapies, vaccinating marker-negative patients, and considering close follow-up or antiviral treatment before immunosuppressive treatment initiation or in the event of HBV reactivation. Here, we discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying HBV reactivation during biological treatments, most notably in patients with occult HBV infection or markers for remote HBV infection, whose hepatocyte nuclei may contain a resistance form of HBV DNA known as covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). Assessment of the risk of reactivation relies on the HBV status, drugs used, and data from the literature. Finally, we discuss the various recommendations and modalities for HBV vaccination, preemptive treatment, and patient management, according to the level of risk and to the circumstances in which reactivation occurs

Les mutants précore et du promoteur basal du core du virus de l’hépatite B

Le virus de l’hépatite B (VHB) est le seul virus à ADN qui possède une étape de reverse transcription au cours de son cycle de réplication. L’absence d’activité 3’-5’ exonucléasique de la fonction reversetranscriptase de l’ADN polymérase du virus génère une accumulation de mutations sur l’ensemble du génome viral. Ainsi, chez un même individu vont coexister des populations virales sauvages et mutées qui pourront évoluer tout au long de l’histoire naturelle de l’infection. La variabilité génétique du VHB s’observe dans toutes les régions du génome viral. La mutation la plus fréquemment décrite dans la région précore (PC) du VHB est la mutation G1896A qui induit la formation d’un codon stop dans l’ARN précore et abolit la synthèse de l’antigène HBe. Dans la région du promoteur basal du core (PBC), la double mutation (A1762T-G1764A) est associée à une baisse de la synthèse de l’antigène HBe. L’impact des mutants PC et du PBC dans l’histoire naturelle de l’hépatite B et dans la sévérité des lésions hépatiques n’est pas clairement établi

Actualités sur les co-infections VIH–VHC

Objectives To evaluate the incidence of HIV–HCV co-infections and analyse the outcome in co-infected patients. Epidemiology. Effects of antivirals The prevalence of the co-infection by the HCV thus varies from 10 to 14% on subjects who have sexual behaviors at risk at 80 or 90% on users of drug IV. Numerous studies showed that the infection by the HIV made worse the natural history of the infection by the HCV [J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 6 1993 602–610; J Hepatol 28 1998 945–950]. On the other hand, the studies which endeavoured to appreciate the effect of the antiretroviral therapeutics on the natural history of the chronic hepatitis C, on the co-infected patients, are more discussed. In cohorts of big size, it was demonstrated that the hepatic mortality increased with the exposure to antiretrovirals. However, the duration of the antiretroviral treatment also reports the more important survival of the patients, which distorts credibly the figures. The effect of the infection by the HCV on the progress of the disease with HIV is more discussed. The patients infected by the HIV, in any case, have to benefit from the research for a co-infection by the viruses of hepatitis B and C (HBV and HCV). This screening must be renewed every year, in particular on the drug addicts patients or presenting behaviors at risk. Viral replication The research of a viral replication, must be implemented for any confirmed positive HCV serology. The research of the HCV RNA needs ultrasensitive techniques of molecular biology which allow a qualitative detection andor a quantification of the viral genome (viral load). The techniques of last generation of real-time PCR combine both approaches (detection and quantification). The viral load HCV is not correlated to the degree of hepatic disease and does not predict the severity of the hepatic disease, contrary to the correlation demonstrated in the infection by the HIV. On the other hand, it can be a predictive factor in the response to the treatment. The pretherapeutic check-up also includes a determination of the viral genotype because a strong involvement in the response to the treatment was clearly demonstrated. Hepatic fibrosis The hepatic fibrosis must be estimated on patients having a chronic hepatitis because it conditions the prognosis and the treatment of the hepatitis. The anatomopathological study after hepatic biopsy (DHB) remains the reference method. Recently, the development of non invasive methods of measure of the hepatic fibrosis improved the care of hepatitis C, notably the blood tests (fibrotest BioPredictive Paris, fibrometer BLS Angers) and physical measures as the impulsional elastometry (Fibroscan® Echosens) which substitutes more and more in practice to the draining hepatic biopsy. Treatment Numerous studies now validated the treatment associating interferon pegilated and ribavirine as the reference treatment on the co-infected patients HIV/HCV. This treatment involves a high virological response going from 14 to 36% in the patients infected by a genotype 1 and 2 and from 43 to 73% in the patients infected by a genotype 2 or 3. The duration of the treatment is 48 weeks. As well as usual virological factors on the mono-infected patients (genotype, viral load), the rate of CD4 is one of the best predictive factors with a good response. Many hopes go towards the new molecules in development (inhibitors of protease), inhibitors of polymerase), with promising results on the mono-infected patients. However, the toxicity of these molecules is not very well known at the moment in the co-infected patients. It is thus necessary to perform trials in this group of patient, by watching very carefully the toxicity of the therapeutic associations

Quantification de l’antigène HBs : intérêts et limites dans le suivi des patients infectés par le virus de l’hépatite B

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is usually used as a qualitative marker for the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, ant its persistence for more 6 months defines chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. HBsAg quantification was introduced several years ago. Commercial quantitative assays are now available and studies have suggested its interest for the monitoring patients with chronic hepatitis B. Indeed, HBsAg titers can correlate with intrahepatic cccDNA levels. Several studies have shown that HBsAg titers vary in the different phases of the natural history of the CHB infection. The kinetic of serum HBsAg seems to have a predictive value of HBsAg clearance after treatment or of reactivation, in the case of lack of response to treatment. However, interpretation has to take into account the phase of CHB infection, the HBV genotype, HBeAg status and serum HBV DNA

Analyse des mutations des domaines ISDR et V3 de la protéine NS5A du virus de l&#039;hépatite C avant le traitement par l&#039;interféron avec ou sans ribavirine

Aim of the study. – The hepatitis C virus (HCV) non-structural NS5A protein has been controversially implicated in the resistance of HCV to interferon therapy in clinical studies. In Japan, mutations in the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) in the NS5A gene were associated with response to interferon therapy in patients infected with genotype 1b. In contrast, studies from Europe did not confirm such association. More recently, it has been suggested that the V3 domain outside the putative ISDR might also have amino acids changes that may be involved in the resistance to IFN. In this study, the relationship between NS5A mutations in ISDR and V3 domains and virological response to therapy were investigated. Materials and methods. – The NS5A gene was sequenced from 35 HCV genotype 1b infected patients at D0 of a prospective clinical trial of interferon therapy and interferon plus Ribavirin combination therapy. Results. – In the ISDR domain, we did not observe any significant differences in amino acids changes between responders (1.7 ± 1.8, n = 19, range 0–6) and non-responders (1.1 ± 0.8, n = 14, range: 0–3), (P = 0.483), to therapy before the beginning of treatment. In the V3 domain, we found more mutations in responders (6.5 ± 1.9, range: 2–11) than in non-responders (4.7 ± 1.2, range: 3–8) (P = 0.0013), before the beginning of treatment. Conclusion. – Our results confirm that, in Europe, the ISDR domain is not predictive for treatment success but suggest that the V3 domain have greater variability in responders than non-responders

Impact of serodiagnosis on the management of Lyme borreliosis at Angers University Hospital

Introduction Lyme borreliosis (LB) is an emerging arthropod-borne disease the diagnosis of which is made on clinical and biological data. We assessed the Angers University Hospital physicians’ management of LB, in case of positive serology, and estimated their compliance to European recommendations (EUCALB). Methods We retrospectively included 75 cases with positive ELISA serologies confirmed by Western-Blot, performed at the Angers University Hospital between 2008 and 2012. Results and discussion There were 4 cases of early localized phase, 26 of early-disseminated phase (including 17 cases of neuroborreliosis), and one case of late phase. The curative management complied with EUCALB guidelines in 28 cases out of 31. Conclusion Serology remains a reference diagnostic tool for LB, as long as the practitioner is aware of the main clinical and biological criteria