A Bibliometric and Mapping Analysis of Glaucoma Research between 1900 and 2019

PurposeTo explore the relevance of scientific production on glaucoma using bibliometric tools.DesignBibliographic study.ParticipantsOriginal articles published from 1900 through 2019.MethodsWe performed a search in Web of Science for documents published between 1900 and 2019. We used bibliometric indicators to explore documents production, dispersion, distribution, time of duplication, and annual growth, as characterized by Price's law of scientific literature growth, Lotka's law, the transient index, and the Bradford model. We also calculated the participation index of different countries and institutions. Finally, we explored with bibliometric mapping the co-occurrence networks for the most frequently used terms in glaucoma research.Main outcome measuresBibliometric indicators for individuals, institutions, and countries.ResultsA total of 33 631 original articles were collected from the timeframe 1900 through 2019. Price's law showed an exponential growth. Scientific production was adjusted better to exponential growth (r = 0.967) than linear growth (r = 0.755). Literature on glaucoma research increased its growth in the last 30 years at a rate of 5.1% per year with a production that doubled its size every 13.9 years. The transience index was 60.08%; this indicates that most of the scientific production is the output of very few authors. Bradford's law showed a high concentration of articles published in a small core of specialized journals. Lotka's law indicated that the distribution of authors is concentrated heavily in small producers. The United States and University of London demonstrated the highest production of original articles. Map network visualization showed the generated term map detailing clusters of closely related terms.ConclusionsGlaucoma literature has grown exponentially. A very high rate of transience was found that indicates the presence of numerous authors who sporadically publish on this topic. No evidence of a saturation point in the glaucoma literature was observed

Variations in Lens Thickness Affecting the Anterior Chamber Length and Their Potential Measurement Using a Biometer

Biometry is a critical aspect of ophthalmology, since it facilitates the measurement of several ocular parameters and aids in the diagnosis of conditions like glaucoma. The advent of the IOLMaster in 1999 marked a pivotal moment in biometry by introducing non-contact and highly precise measurements that revolutionized the field. Low-coherence optical reflectometry devices such as Lenstar LS900 and Aladdin have further advanced biometry, due to the exceptional accuracy they offer. Axial length, a fundamental measurement in biometry, directly correlates with conditions like myopia and glaucoma. The accurate measurement of axial length is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning. Biometry also guides intraocular lens power calculation during cataract surgery, relying on factors like axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and effective lens position (ELP). Ensuring precision in these measurements is essential for optimal surgical outcomes. While several studies have explored biometric parameters, dynamic changes in crystalline lens thickness during rest or accommodation have received little attention. These changes may have a significant effect on the measurement of the anterior chamber length, and consequently impact the overall biometric assessment. This study delves into dynamic biometry, particularly in the context of age-related presbyopia, and aims to assess the feasibility of incorporating into the biometric process a specialized device capable of accurately considering crystalline lens changes during different states like rest and accommodation. This exploration seeks to enhance the understanding of ocular dynamics and contribute to improving the precision of diagnostic and surgical techniques. It underscores the importance of staying at the forefront of biometric research, especially in the context of emerging technologies and their potential to transform ophthalmology.Depto. de ÓpticaFac. de Óptica y OptometríaTRUEpu

A bibliometric study of the scientific publications on patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology

Introduction We have conducted a bibliometric study of the scientific publications on patient-reported outcomes in the field of rheumatology. Methods SCOPUS was the database used in this bibliometric study. We performed two searches. The main search involved selecting the documents published between 2000 and 2014 limited to top-tier journals addressing rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, using specific descriptors together with the operator and main descriptor “patient-reported outcomes” (PROs), and we performed a secondary search, with the following specific descriptors: “pain,” “functional capacity,” and “fatigue.” We used bibliometric indicators for articles distribution (Price’s law for the increase of scientific literature and Bradford’s law for dispersion of articles). We also calculated the participation index of the different countries. Results A total of 983 original articles were published between 2000 and 2014. Our results confirmed the fulfilment of Price’s law (correlation coefficient r = 0.9385 after linear adjustment). The average number of articles per Bradford Zone was 327.6. A total of 30 different journals were published. The type of growth for the descriptors “pain” (r2 = 0.5417 compared to r2 = 0.4839) and “fatigue” (r2 = 06276 compared to r2 = 0.5544) is exponential, whereas it is linear for the descriptor “functional capacity” (r2 = 0.6769 compared to r2 = 0.3779). Discussion This study revealed significant linear growth of patient-related outcomes in global terms, as well as upward trends for most of the citation-based bibliometric indices, especially significant from 2010 to 2014. Pain and fatigue have greater growth as PRO concepts