156 research outputs found

    Elastomeric actuator devices for magnetic resonance imaging

    Get PDF
    The present invention is directed to devices and systems used in magnetic imaging environments that include an actuator device having an elastomeric dielectric film with at least two electrodes, and a frame attached to the actuator device. The frame can have a plurality of configurations including, such as, for example, at least two members that can be, but not limited to, curved beams, rods, plates, or parallel beams. These rigid members can be coupled to flexible members such as, for example, links wherein the frame provides an elastic restoring force. The frame preferably provides a linear actuation force characteristic over a displacement range. The linear actuation force characteristic is defined as .+-.20% and preferably 10% over a displacement range. The actuator further includes a passive element disposed between the flexible members to tune a stiffness characteristic of the actuator. The passive element can be a bi-stable element. The preferred embodiment actuator includes one or more layers of the elastomeric film integrated into the frame. The elastomeric film can be made of many elastomeric materials such as, for example, but not limited to, acrylic, silicone and latex

    Holograms to Focus Arbitrary Ultrasonic Fields through the Skull

    Full text link
    [EN] We report 3D-printed acoustic holographic lenses for the formation of ultrasonic fields of complex spatial distribution inside the skull. Using holographic lenses, we experimentally, numerically and theoretically produce acoustic beams whose spatial distribution matches target structures of the central nervous system. In particular, we produce three types of targets of increasing complexity. First, a set of points are selected at the center of both right and left human hippocampi. Experiments using a skull phantom and 3D printed acoustic holographic lenses show that the corresponding bi-focal lens simultaneously focuses acoustic energy at the target foci, with good agreement between theory and simulations. Second, an arbitrary curve is set as the target inside the skull phantom. Using time-reversal methods the holographic beam bends following the target path, in a similar way as self-bending beams do in free space. Finally, the right human hippocampus is selected as a target volume. The focus of the corresponding holographic lens overlaps with the target volume in excellent agreement between theory in free-media, and experiments and simulations including the skull phantom. The precise control of focused ultrasound into the central nervous system is mainly limited due to the strong phase aberrations produced by refraction and attenuation of the skull. Using the present method, the ultrasonic beam can be focused not only at a single point but overlapping one or various target structures simultaneously using low-cost 3D-printed acoustic holographic lens. The results open new paths to spread incoming biomedical ultrasound applications including blood-brain barrier opening and neuromodulation.This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation (MINECO) through Project No. TEC2016-80976-R. N.J. and S.J. acknowledge financial support from Generalitat Valenciana through Grants No. APOSTD/2017/042, No. ACIF/2017/045, and No. GV/2018/11. F.C. acknowledges financial support from Agencia Valenciana de la Innovacio through Grant No. INNCON00/18/9 and European Regional Development Fund (Grant No. IDIFEDER/2018/022).Jiménez-Gambín, S.; Jimenez, N.; Benlloch Baviera, JM.; Camarena Femenia, F. (2019). Holograms to Focus Arbitrary Ultrasonic Fields through the Skull. Physical Review Applied. 12(1):014016-1-014016-14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.014016S014016-1014016-14121GABOR, D. (1948). A New Microscopic Principle. Nature, 161(4098), 777-778. doi:10.1038/161777a0Microscopy by reconstructed wave-fronts. (1949). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 197(1051), 454-487. doi:10.1098/rspa.1949.0075Leith, E. N., & Upatnieks, J. (1962). Reconstructed Wavefronts and Communication Theory*. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 52(10), 1123. doi:10.1364/josa.52.001123Ni, X., Kildishev, A. V., & Shalaev, V. M. (2013). Metasurface holograms for visible light. Nature Communications, 4(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms3807Huang, L., Chen, X., Mühlenbernd, H., Zhang, H., Chen, S., Bai, B., … Zhang, S. (2013). Three-dimensional optical holography using a plasmonic metasurface. Nature Communications, 4(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms3808Ma, G., & Sheng, P. (2016). Acoustic metamaterials: From local resonances to broad horizons. Science Advances, 2(2), e1501595. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501595Cummer, S. A., Christensen, J., & Alù, A. (2016). Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nature Reviews Materials, 1(3). doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1Liu, Z. (2000). Locally Resonant Sonic Materials. Science, 289(5485), 1734-1736. doi:10.1126/science.289.5485.1734Fang, N., Xi, D., Xu, J., Ambati, M., Srituravanich, W., Sun, C., & Zhang, X. (2006). Ultrasonic metamaterials with negative modulus. Nature Materials, 5(6), 452-456. doi:10.1038/nmat1644Yang, M., Ma, G., Yang, Z., & Sheng, P. (2013). Coupled Membranes with Doubly Negative Mass Density and Bulk Modulus. Physical Review Letters, 110(13). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.134301Li, Y., Liang, B., Gu, Z., Zou, X., & Cheng, J. (2013). Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces. Scientific Reports, 3(1). doi:10.1038/srep02546Xie, Y., Wang, W., Chen, H., Konneker, A., Popa, B.-I., & Cummer, S. A. (2014). Wavefront modulation and subwavelength diffractive acoustics with an acoustic metasurface. Nature Communications, 5(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms6553Jiménez, N., Cox, T. J., Romero-García, V., & Groby, J.-P. (2017). Metadiffusers: Deep-subwavelength sound diffusers. Scientific Reports, 7(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05710-5Jiménez, N., Romero-García, V., Pagneux, V., & Groby, J.-P. (2017). Rainbow-trapping absorbers: Broadband, perfect and asymmetric sound absorption by subwavelength panels for transmission problems. Scientific Reports, 7(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13706-4Qi, S., Li, Y., & Assouar, B. (2017). Acoustic Focusing and Energy Confinement Based on Multilateral Metasurfaces. Physical Review Applied, 7(5). doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.7.054006Bok, E., Park, J. J., Choi, H., Han, C. K., Wright, O. B., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Metasurface for Water-to-Air Sound Transmission. Physical Review Letters, 120(4). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.044302Li, Y., Jiang, X., Liang, B., Cheng, J., & Zhang, L. (2015). Metascreen-Based Acoustic Passive Phased Array. Physical Review Applied, 4(2). doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.4.024003Li, Y., & Assouar, M. B. (2015). Three-dimensional collimated self-accelerating beam through acoustic metascreen. Scientific Reports, 5(1). doi:10.1038/srep17612Kaina, N., Lemoult, F., Fink, M., & Lerosey, G. (2015). Negative refractive index and acoustic superlens from multiple scattering in single negative metamaterials. Nature, 525(7567), 77-81. doi:10.1038/nature14678Li, J., Fok, L., Yin, X., Bartal, G., & Zhang, X. (2009). Experimental demonstration of an acoustic magnifying hyperlens. Nature Materials, 8(12), 931-934. doi:10.1038/nmat2561Melde, K., Mark, A. G., Qiu, T., & Fischer, P. (2016). Holograms for acoustics. Nature, 537(7621), 518-522. doi:10.1038/nature19755Xie, Y., Shen, C., Wang, W., Li, J., Suo, D., Popa, B.-I., … Cummer, S. A. (2016). Acoustic Holographic Rendering with Two-dimensional Metamaterial-based Passive Phased Array. Scientific Reports, 6(1). doi:10.1038/srep35437Zhu, Y., Hu, J., Fan, X., Yang, J., Liang, B., Zhu, X., & Cheng, J. (2018). Fine manipulation of sound via lossy metamaterials with independent and arbitrary reflection amplitude and phase. Nature Communications, 9(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04103-0Memoli, G., Caleap, M., Asakawa, M., Sahoo, D. R., Drinkwater, B. W., & Subramanian, S. (2017). Metamaterial bricks and quantization of meta-surfaces. Nature Communications, 8(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms14608Brown, M. D., Cox, B. T., & Treeby, B. E. (2017). Design of multi-frequency acoustic kinoforms. Applied Physics Letters, 111(24), 244101. doi:10.1063/1.5004040Hertzberg, Y., & Navon, G. (2011). Bypassing absorbing objects in focused ultrasound using computer generated holographic technique. Medical Physics, 38(12), 6407-6415. doi:10.1118/1.3651464Zhang, P., Li, T., Zhu, J., Zhu, X., Yang, S., Wang, Y., … Zhang, X. (2014). Generation of acoustic self-bending and bottle beams by phase engineering. Nature Communications, 5(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms5316Marzo, A., Seah, S. A., Drinkwater, B. W., Sahoo, D. R., Long, B., & Subramanian, S. (2015). Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects. Nature Communications, 6(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms9661Ter Haar, >Gail, & Coussios, C. (2007). High intensity focused ultrasound: Physical principles and devices. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 23(2), 89-104. doi:10.1080/02656730601186138Gélat, P., ter Haar, G., & Saffari, N. (2014). A comparison of methods for focusing the field of a HIFU array transducer through human ribs. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 59(12), 3139-3171. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/12/3139Fry, F. J., & Barger, J. E. (1978). Acoustical properties of the human skull. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63(5), 1576-1590. doi:10.1121/1.381852Thomas, J.-L., & Fink, M. A. (1996). Ultrasonic beam focusing through tissue inhomogeneities with a time reversal mirror: application to transskull therapy. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 43(6), 1122-1129. doi:10.1109/58.542055Hynynen, K., & Jolesz, F. A. (1998). Demonstration of Potential Noninvasive Ultrasound Brain Therapy Through an Intact Skull. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 24(2), 275-283. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00269-xSun, J., & Hynynen, K. (1998). Focusing of therapeutic ultrasound through a human skull: A numerical study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(3), 1705-1715. doi:10.1121/1.424383Aubry, J.-F., Tanter, M., Pernot, M., Thomas, J.-L., & Fink, M. (2003). Experimental demonstration of noninvasive transskull adaptive focusing based on prior computed tomography scans. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(1), 84-93. doi:10.1121/1.1529663Tanter, M., Thomas, J.-L., & Fink, M. (1998). Focusing and steering through absorbing and aberrating layers: Application to ultrasonic propagation through the skull. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(5), 2403-2410. doi:10.1121/1.422759Hertzberg, Y., Volovick, A., Zur, Y., Medan, Y., Vitek, S., & Navon, G. (2010). Ultrasound focusing using magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging: Application to ultrasound transcranial therapy. Medical Physics, 37(6Part1), 2934-2942. doi:10.1118/1.3395553Jolesz, F. A. (Ed.). (2014). Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7657-3Shen, C., Xu, J., Fang, N. X., & Jing, Y. (2014). Anisotropic Complementary Acoustic Metamaterial for Canceling out Aberrating Layers. Physical Review X, 4(4). doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.041033Maimbourg, G., Houdouin, A., Deffieux, T., Tanter, M., & Aubry, J.-F. (2018). 3D-printed adaptive acoustic lens as a disruptive technology for transcranial ultrasound therapy using single-element transducers. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 63(2), 025026. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aaa037Ferri, M., Bravo, J. M., Redondo, J., & Sánchez-Pérez, J. V. (2019). Enhanced Numerical Method for the Design of 3-D-Printed Holographic Acoustic Lenses for Aberration Correction of Single-Element Transcranial Focused Ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 45(3), 867-884. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.10.022Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., & Jolesz, F. A. (2001). Noninvasive MR Imaging–guided Focal Opening of the Blood-Brain Barrier in Rabbits. Radiology, 220(3), 640-646. doi:10.1148/radiol.2202001804Tyler, W. J., Tufail, Y., Finsterwald, M., Tauchmann, M. L., Olson, E. J., & Majestic, C. (2008). Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound. PLoS ONE, 3(10), e3511. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003511Schneider, U., Pedroni, E., & Lomax, A. (1996). The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 41(1), 111-124. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/41/1/009Mast, T. D. (2000). Empirical relationships between acoustic parameters in human soft tissues. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 1(2), 37-42. doi:10.1121/1.1336896Mazziotta, J. C., Toga, A. W., Evans, A., Fox, P., & Lancaster, J. (1995). A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development. NeuroImage, 2(2), 89-101. doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1012Yushkevich, P. A., Piven, J., Hazlett, H. C., Smith, R. G., Ho, S., Gee, J. C., & Gerig, G. (2006). User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage, 31(3), 1116-1128. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015Treeby, B. E., & Cox, B. T. (2010). Modeling power law absorption and dispersion for acoustic propagation using the fractional Laplacian. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(5), 2741-2748. doi:10.1121/1.3377056Treeby, B. E., Jaros, J., Rendell, A. P., & Cox, B. T. (2012). Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(6), 4324-4336. doi:10.1121/1.4712021Jiménez, N., Camarena, F., Redondo, J., Sánchez-Morcillo, V., Hou, Y., & Konofagou, E. E. (2016). Time-Domain Simulation of Ultrasound Propagation in a Tissue-Like Medium Based on the Resolution of the Nonlinear Acoustic Constitutive Relations. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 102(5), 876-892. doi:10.3813/aaa.919002Jiménez, N., Romero-García, V., Pagneux, V., & Groby, J.-P. (2017). Quasiperfect absorption by subwavelength acoustic panels in transmission using accumulation of resonances due to slow sound. Physical Review B, 95(1). doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.014205Tsang, P. W. M., & Poon, T.-C. (2013). Novel method for converting digital Fresnel hologram to phase-only hologram based on bidirectional error diffusion. Optics Express, 21(20), 23680. doi:10.1364/oe.21.023680Lirette, R., & Mobley, J. (2017). Focal zone characteristics of stepped Fresnel and axicon acoustic lenses. doi:10.1121/2.0000703Gatto, M., Memoli, G., Shaw, A., Sadhoo, N., Gelat, P., & Harris, R. A. (2012). Three-Dimensional Printing (3DP) of neonatal head phantom for ultrasound: Thermocouple embedding and simulation of bone. Medical Engineering & Physics, 34(7), 929-937. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.10.012Robertson, J., Martin, E., Cox, B., & Treeby, B. E. (2017). Sensitivity of simulated transcranial ultrasound fields to acoustic medium property maps. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 62(7), 2559-2580. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa5e98Hill, C. R., Bamber, J. C., & ter Haar, G. R. (Eds.). (2004). Physical Principles of Medical Ultrasonics. doi:10.1002/0470093978O’Neil, H. T. (1949). Theory of Focusing Radiators. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 21(5), 516-526. doi:10.1121/1.1906542Chen, D.-C., Zhu, X.-F., Wei, Q., Wu, D.-J., & Liu, X.-J. (2018). Broadband acoustic focusing by Airy-like beams based on acoustic metasurfaces. Journal of Applied Physics, 123(4), 044503. doi:10.1063/1.501070

    Image-guided focused ultrasound ablation of breast cancer: current status, challenges, and future directions

    Get PDF
    Image-guided focussed ultrasound (FUS) ablation is a non-invasive procedure that has been used for treatment of benign or malignant breast tumours. Image-guidance during ablation is achieved either by using real-time ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The past decade phase I studies have proven MRI-guided and US-guided FUS ablation of breast cancer to be technically feasible and safe. We provide an overview of studies assessing the efficacy of FUS for breast tumour ablation as measured by percentages of complete tumour necrosis. Successful ablation ranged from 20% to 100%, depending on FUS system type, imaging technique, ablation protocol, and patient selection. Specific issues related to FUS ablation of breast cancer, such as increased treatment time for larger tumours, size of ablation margins, methods used for margin assessment and residual tumour detection after FUS ablation, and impact of FUS ablation on sentinel node procedure are presented. Finally, potential future applications of FUS for breast cancer treatment such as FUS-induced anti-tumour immune response, FUS-mediated gene transfer, and enhanced drug delivery are discussed. Currently, breast-conserving surgery remains the gold standard for breast cancer treatment

    Investigation of Cellular and Molecular Responses to Pulsed Focused Ultrasound in a Mouse Model

    Get PDF
    Continuous focused ultrasound (cFUS) has been widely used for thermal ablation of tissues, relying on continuous exposures to generate temperatures necessary to induce coagulative necrosis. Pulsed FUS (pFUS) employs non-continuous exposures that lower the rate of energy deposition and allow cooling to occur between pulses, thereby minimizing thermal effects and emphasizing effects created by non-thermal mechanisms of FUS (i.e., acoustic radiation forces and acoustic cavitation). pFUS has shown promise for a variety of applications including drug and nanoparticle delivery; however, little is understood about the effects these exposures have on tissue, especially with regard to cellular pro-homing factors (growth factors, cytokines, and cell adhesion molecules). We examined changes in murine hamstring muscle following pFUS or cFUS and demonstrate that pFUS, unlike cFUS, has little effect on the histological integrity of muscle and does not induce cell death. Infiltration of macrophages was observed 3 and 8 days following pFUS or cFUS exposures. pFUS increased expression of several cytokines (e.g., IL-1α, IL-1β, TNFα, INFγ, MIP-1α, MCP-1, and GMCSF) creating a local cytokine gradient on days 0 and 1 post-pFUS that returns to baseline levels by day 3 post-pFUS. pFUS exposures induced upregulation of other signaling molecules (e.g., VEGF, FGF, PlGF, HGF, and SDF-1α) and cell adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1 and VCAM-1) on muscle vasculature. The observed molecular changes in muscle following pFUS may be utilized to target cellular therapies by increasing homing to areas of pathology

    Radiogenomic Mapping of Edema/Cellular Invasion MRI-Phenotypes in Glioblastoma Multiforme

    Get PDF
    Despite recent discoveries of new molecular targets and pathways, the search for an effective therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) continues. A newly emerged field, radiogenomics, links gene expression profiles with MRI phenotypes. MRI-FLAIR is a noninvasive diagnostic modality and was previously found to correlate with cellular invasion in GBM. Thus, our radiogenomic screen has the potential to reveal novel molecular determinants of invasion. Here, we present the first comprehensive radiogenomic analysis using quantitative MRI volumetrics and large-scale gene- and microRNA expression profiling in GBM.Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), discovery and validation sets with gene, microRNA, and quantitative MR-imaging data were created. Top concordant genes and microRNAs correlated with high FLAIR volumes from both sets were further characterized by Kaplan Meier survival statistics, microRNA-gene correlation analyses, and GBM molecular subtype-specific distribution.The top upregulated gene in both the discovery (4 fold) and validation (11 fold) sets was PERIOSTIN (POSTN). The top downregulated microRNA in both sets was miR-219, which is predicted to bind to POSTN. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that above median expression of POSTN resulted in significantly decreased survival and shorter time to disease progression (P<0.001). High POSTN and low miR-219 expression were significantly associated with the mesenchymal GBM subtype (P<0.0001).Here, we propose a novel diagnostic method to screen for molecular cancer subtypes and genomic correlates of cellular invasion. Our findings also have potential therapeutic significance since successful molecular inhibition of invasion will improve therapy and patient survival in GBM
    corecore