10 research outputs found
Assessment of Perturbative Explicitly Correlated Methods for Prototypes of Multiconfiguration Electronic Structure
The
performance of the [2]<sub>S</sub> and [2]<sub>R12</sub> universal
perturbative corrections that account for one- and many-body basis
set errors of single- and multiconfiguration electronic structure
methods is assessed. A new formulation of the [2]<sub>R12</sub> methods
is used in which only strongly occupied orbitals are correlated, making
the approach more amenable for larger computations. Three model problems
are considered using the aug-cc-pVXZ (X = D,T,Q) basis sets: the electron
affinity of fluorine atom, a conformational analysis of two Si<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> structures, and a description of the potential
energy surfaces of the X <sup>1</sup>ÎŁ<sub>g</sub><sup>+</sup>, a <sup>3</sup>Î <sub>u</sub>,
b <sup>3</sup>ÎŁ<sub>g</sub><sup>â</sup>, and A <sup>1</sup>Î <sub>u</sub> states of C<sub>2</sub>. In general, the [2]<sub>R12</sub> and [2]<sub>S</sub> corrections
enhance energy convergence for conventional multireference configuration
interaction (MRCI) and multireference perturbation theory (MRMP2)
calculations compared to their complete basis set limits. For the
electron affinity of the F atom, [2]<sub>R12</sub> electron affinities
are within 0.001 eV of the experimental value. The [2]<sub>R12</sub> conformer relative energy error for Si<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> is
less than 0.1 kcal/mol compared to the complete basis set limit. The
C<sub>2</sub> potential energy surfaces show nonparallelity errors
that are within 0.7 kcal/mol compared to the complete basis set limit.
The perturbative nature of the [2]<sub>R12</sub> and [2]<sub>S</sub> methods facilitates the development of a straightforward text-based
data exchange standard that connects an electronic structure code
that can produce a two-particle density matrix with a code that computes
the corrections. This data exchange standard was used to implement
the interface between the GAMESS MRCI and MRMP2 codes and the MPQC
[2]<sub>R12</sub> and [2]<sub>S</sub> capabilities
Spin-Free [2]<sub>R12</sub> Basis Set Incompleteness Correction to the Local Multireference Configuration Interaction and the Local Multireference Average Coupled Pair Functional Methods
The
local multireference configuration interaction (LMRCI) and
local multireference averaged coupled pair functional (LMRACPF) methods
are extended to include explicit correlation via the universal spin-free
[2]<sub>R12</sub> basis set incompleteness correction. Four test cases
are examined to measure the performance of the LMRCI+[2]<sub>R12</sub> (without and with the Davidson + Q correction for size-extensivity)
and LMRACPF+[2]<sub>R12</sub> methods. These tests examine bond dissociation
energies (BDEs) for ethene, perfluoroethene, propene, and 2-butene.
As has been demonstrated for other methods, the LMRCI+[2]<sub>R12</sub>/LMRCI+Q+[2]<sub>R12</sub>/LMRACPF+[2]<sub>R12</sub> BDEs are as
accurate as the conventional LMRCI/LMRACPF BDEs that are computed
with the basis set one cardinal number higher. It is shown that LMRCI+[2]<sub>R12</sub>/LMRCI+Q+[2]<sub>R12</sub>/LMRACPF+[2]<sub>R12</sub> BDEs
computed with the June calendar basis sets preserve the accuracy of
the corresponding BDEs computed with the conventional aug-cc-pVXZ
basis sets (where X = D, T, Q)
Reading GenesisâJoshua as a Unified Document from an Early Date: A Settler Colonial Perspective
This essay proposes based on literary-compositional considerations how two authors working together could have composed GenesisâJoshua. After this, it suggests that GenesisâJoshua can be seen to reflect a sociopolitical transformation of ancient Canaanite societies into an Israelite one(s) through a process that can be labeled as ancient settler colonialism, and that the document could have been written concomitantly. Subsequently, relevant ancient Near Eastern and archaeological evidence will be considered, suggesting compatibility with the idea that GenesisâJoshua has reused and readapted existing traditions together with creative narrative retelling for its socio-political purposes, and that this could have already taken place from the late second millennium Bce on. The essay concludes by drawing out some explicit contemporary implications of such a reading of GenesisâJoshua