Metastatic skull tumors: MRI features and a new conventional classification

Skull metastases are malignant bone tumors which are increasing in incidence. The objectives of this study were to characterize the MR imaging features, locations, and extent of metastatic skull tumors to determine the frequency of the symptomatic disease, and to assess patient outcomes. Between September 2002 and March 2008, 175 patients undergoing routine head MR imaging were found to have metastatic skull tumors. Contrast-enhanced study with fat suppression was used in some cases when required. Classification of metastases was simplified to three yes/no questions: first, with regard to location (either in the calvarium or in the cranial base); second, with regard to distribution within the plane of the cranial bone (either “circumscribed” meaning clearly demarcated and confined to one bone, or “diffuse” and likely to spread across a suture to another bone); and third, with regard to invasion (“intraosseous” in cranial bones only, or “invasive” spreading from the skull, either out into the scalp or inward to the dura and perhaps further in). Primary sites were breast cancer (55%), lung cancer (14%), prostate cancer (6%), malignant lymphoma (5%), and others (20%). The mean time from primary diagnosis to skull metastasis diagnosis was 71 months for cases of breast cancer, 26 months for prostate cancer, 9 months for lung cancer, and 4 months for malignant lymphoma. Calvarial circumscribed intraosseous metastases were found most frequently (27%). The patients were mainly asymptomatic. However, some patients suffered from local pain or cranial nerve palsies that harmed their quality of life. Treatment, mainly for symptomatic cases, was by local or whole-skull irradiation. Metastatic skull tumors are not rare, and most are calvarial circumscribed intraosseous tumors. MR images contribute to understanding their type, location, and multiplicity, and their relationship to the brain, cranial nerves, and dural sinuses. Radiation therapy improved the QOL of patients with neurological symptoms

Co-Deletion of Chromosome 1p/19q and IDH1/2 Mutation in Glioma Subsets of Brain Tumors in Chinese Patients

OBJECTIVE: To characterize co-deletion of chromosome 1p/19q and IDH1/2 mutation in Chinese brain tumor patients and to assess their associations with clinical features. METHODS: In a series of 528 patients with gliomas, pathological and radiological materials were reviewed. Pathological constituents of tumor subsets, incidences of 1p/19q co-deletion and IDH1/2 mutation in gliomas by regions and sides in the brain were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 1p and 19q was detected in 339 patients by FISH method while the sequence of IDH1/2 was determined in 280 patients. Gliomas of frontal, temporal and insular origin had significantly different pathological constituents of tumor subsets (P<0.001). Gliomas of frontal origin had significantly higher incidence of 1p/19q co-deletion (50.4%) and IDH1/2 mutation (73.5%) than those of non-frontal origin (27.0% and 48.5%, respectively) (P<0.001), while gliomas of temporal origin had significantly lower incidence of 1p/19q co-deletion (23.9%) and IDH1/2 mutation (41.7%) than those of non-temporal origin (39.9% and 63.2%, respectively) (P = 0.013 and P = 0.003, respectively). Subgroup analysis confirmed these findings in oligoastrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors, respectively. Although the difference of 1p/19q co-deletion was not statistically significant in temporal oligodendroglial tumors, the trend was marginally significant (P = 0.082). However, gliomas from different sides of the brain did not show significant different pathological constituents, incidences of 1p/19q co-deletion or IDH1/2 mutation. CONCLUSION: Preferential distribution of pathological subsets, 1p/19q co-deletion and IDH1/2 mutation were confirmed in some brain regions in Chinese glioma patients, implying their distinctive tumor genesis and predictive value for prognosis

TP53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with age at onset of glioblastoma

International audienc

La neuro-oncologie des adolescents et adultes jeunes (AJAS) : place d’une RCP nationale. Au nom de l’ANOCEF, GO-AJA et de la SFCE

International audienceThe skills of adult versus pediatric neuro-oncologists are not completely similar though additive. Because the tumors and their protocols are different and the tolerance and expected sequelae are specific. Multidisciplinary meetings including adult and pediatric neuro-oncologists are warranted to share expertise. Since 2008, a weekly national web based conference was held in France. Any patient with the following criteria could be discussed: Adolescent and Young Adults aged between 15 and 25 years, and any adult with a pediatric type pathology, including medulloblastoma, germ cell tumors, embryonic tumors, ependymoma, pilocytic astrocytoma.ResultsAttendance during the year 2015 was as follows: 42 meetings were held; the median number of cases discussed at each meeting was 4 (1 to 8); the mean number of attendants was 7 (2 to 12). One hundred and sixty-eight cases concerning 121 patients were discussed. Mean age was 30 years old (7 to 67). Forty-eight percent were discussed at diagnosis. The patients had mostly medulloblastomas (40%), germ cell tumors (11%), ependymomas (11%), pineal tumors (7%) and embryonal tumors (8%). The rate of inclusion in protocols was increased since the opening of this web conference, especially for the germ cell tumor SIOP protocol that is opened without age restriction, and in RSMA standard risk or MEVITEM relapse adult medulloblastoma protocols.ConclusionMultidisciplinary Web conference for AYAs is feasible and increases the inclusion rate in protocols. It should be developed further.Les compétences en neuro-oncologie pédiatrique et adulte sont différentes mais complémentaires car les histologies, les protocoles thérapeutiques, la tolérance à court et moyen termes et les séquelles tardives attendues sont spécifiques à chaque tranche d’âge. Depuis 2008, ont été mises en place des réunions virtuelles nationales de concertation pluridisciplinaires hebdomadaires initialement dédiées aux adolescents et jeunes adultes (AJA) (15–25 ans) suspects ou porteurs d’une tumeur du système nerveux central dont l’incidence et l’expertise sont plus importantes en milieu pédiatrique. L’expertise a par la suite aussi bénéficié aux adultes plus âgés porteurs de ces affections. En 2015, 168 cas concernant 121 patients ont été discutés lors de 46 réunions. Le nombre moyen de dossiers discutés était de 4 (1 à 8). L’âge moyen de patients présentés était de 30 ans (7 à 67). Dans 48 % des cas, la discussion portait sur la prise en charge initiale. Le nombre moyen de thérapeutes présents était de 7 (2 à 12). Les histologies concernaient principalement des médulloblastomes 40 %, tumeurs germinales malignes 11 %, épendymomes 11 %, tumeurs pinétumeurs embryonnaires 8 %. La RCP AJA a donc prouvé la faisabilité et l’intérêt d’un échange centré sur cette sous-population, entre spécialistes de la neuro-oncologie d’origine diverses. Elle a permis d’optimiser la prise en charge de ces maladies orphelines, et l’inclusion dans des protocoles nationaux et internationaux, en particulier pour les tumeurs germinales malignes intracrâniennes ouverts à tous âges, et les protocoles s’adressant aux médulloblastomes en première ligne (RSMA) ou en rechute (MEVITEM)

MEVITEM-a phase I/II trial of vismodegib + temozolomide vs temozolomide in patients with recurrent/refractory medulloblastoma with Sonic Hedgehog pathway activation.

Vismodegib specifically inhibits Sonic Hedgehog (SHH). We report results of a phase I/II evaluating vismodegib + temozolomide (TMZ) in immunohistochemically defined SHH recurrent/refractory adult medulloblastoma. TMZ-naïve patients were randomized 2:1 to receive vismodegib + TMZ (arm A) or TMZ (arm B). Patients previously treated with TMZ were enrolled in an exploratory cohort of vismodegib (arm C). If the safety run showed no excessive toxicity, a Simon's 2-stage phase II design was planned to explore the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6). Stage II was to proceed if arm A PFS-6 was ≥3/9 at the end of stage I. A total of 24 patients were included: arm A (10), arm B (5), and arm C (9). Safety analysis showed no excessive toxicity. At the end of stage I, the PFS-6 of arm A was 20% (2/10 patients, 95% unilateral lower confidence limit: 3.7%) and the study was prematurely terminated. The overall response rates (ORR) were 40% (95% CI, 12.2-73.8) and 20% (95% CI, 0.5-71.6) in arm A and B, respectively. In arm C, PFS-6 was 37.5% (95% CI, 8.8-75.5) and ORR was 22.2% (95% CI, 2.8-60.0). Among 11 patients with an expected sensitivity according to new generation sequencing (NGS), 3 had partial response (PR), 4 remained stable disease (SD) while out of 7 potentially resistant patients, 1 had PR and 1 SD. The addition of vismodegib to TMZ did not add toxicity but failed to improve PFS-6 in SHH recurrent/refractory medulloblastoma. Prediction of sensitivity to vismodegib needs further refinements