24 research outputs found

    Evaluation of calcified carotid atheroma on panoramic radiographs and Doppler ultrasonography in an older population

    No full text
    Yusuf Atalay,1 Fatih Asutay,1 Kamil Serkan Agacayak,2 Mahmut Koparal,3 Fahri Adali,4 Belgin Gulsun2 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, 3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, 4Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the reliability of panoramic radiograph (PR) as a screening tool for the detection of calcified carotid atheroma (CCA) by comparing it with Doppler ultrasonography (DU) examination. A second aim was to evaluate the relationship among CCA, systemic diseases, smoking, and body mass index in an older population.Materials and methods: A total of 1,650 PRs of patients aged over 45 years (736 males and 914 females) were randomly selected. All the patients had been referred to the Faculty of Dentistry, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey, during 2013–2014 for routine PR screening. Medical data were collected from the archival records of the dental school. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (study group), CCA findings were confirmed by DU (n=59); and Group B (control group), CCA findings were not confirmed by DU (n=34).Results: Of the 1,650 individuals, 93 (5.63%) were detected to have CCA on PR. The population consisted of 43 males and 50 females with mean age of 59.84±10.92 years. No difference was determined in respect of CCA between the sexes (P=0.745). There was a significant difference between Group A and Group B in respect of hypertension (P=0.004). But there was no difference between Group A and Group B in respect of age (P=0.495), BMI (P=0.756), diabetes (P=0.168), and smoking (P=0.482) distribution.Conclusion: Although PR cannot be used as an initial diagnostic method when searching for CCA, dentists should be aware of CCA on a routine PR, particularly in older patients who may also have the risk factors of obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and smoking. Recognizing of CCA especially in hypertensive patients could potentially increase the length and quality of life for individuals. Keywords: panoramic radiograph, calcified carotid atheroma, atherosclerosis, risk factors, ultrasonography&nbsp

    Implantation of fiducial markers for image guidance in prostate radiotherapy: patient-reported toxicity

    No full text
    WOS: 000272739500011PubMed ID: 19505970The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported morbidity of implanted fiducial markers used for image guidance in prostate radiotherapy. Three fiducial markers were implanted under transrectal ultrasound guidance to 177 patients who were referred to our department for definitive radiotherapy between June 2005 and January 2008. No local anaesthesia was administered. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire about the possible side effects of this invasive procedure. 135 patients completed the questionnaire at a median of 57 weeks after the procedure. Pain during the procedure was assessed with the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. Patients were also asked to compare the pain with the diagnostic biopsy. Although haematuria, rectal bleeding and fever were reported by 15%, 4% and 2% of the 135 patients, respectively, no major toxicity necessitating any intervention was observed. The mean pain score reported by the patients was 1.7 (range, 0-5). 87% of patients reported less (or comparable) pain than the diagnostic biopsy. In conclusion, implantation of fiducial markers for image guidance in prostate radiotherapy is a safe and well-tolerated procedure. (C) 2009 The British Institute of Radiolog
    corecore