Final Results of Cilostazol-Aspirin Therapy against Recurrent Stroke with Intracranial Artery Stenosis (CATHARSIS)

Purpose: To compare the effect of cilostazol plus aspirin versus aspirin alone on the progression of intracranial arterial stenosis (IAS), and to compare ischemic and hemorrhagic events in patients with symptomatic IAS, an investigator-driven, nationwide multicenter cooperative randomized controlled trial (CATHARSIS; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier 00333164) was conducted. Methods: 165 noncardioembolic ischemic stroke patients with >50% stenosis in the responsible intracranial artery after 2 weeks to 6 months from the onset were randomly allocated to receive either cilostazol 200 mg/day plus aspirin 100 mg/day (n = 83, CA group) or aspirin 100 mg/day alone (n = 82, A group). The primary endpoint was the progression of IAS on magnetic resonance angiography at 2 years after randomization. Secondary endpoints were any vascular events, any cause of death, serious adverse events, new silent brain infarcts, and worsening of the modified Rankin Scale score. Results: Progression of IAS was observed in 9.6% of the CA group patients and in 5.6% of the A group patients, with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.53). The incidence of the secondary endpoints tended to be lower in the CA group compared with the A group, although the differences were not significant. By using exploratory logistic regression analysis adjusted for patient background characteristics, it was shown that the risk for certain combinations of secondary endpoints was lower in the CA group than in the A group [all vascular events and silent brain infarcts: odds ratio (OR) = 0.37, p = 0.04; stroke and silent brain infarcts: OR = 0.34, p = 0.04; all vascular events, worsening of modified Rankin Scale scores and silent brain infracts: OR = 0.41, p = 0.03]. Major hemorrhage was observed in 4 patients of the CA group and in 3 of the A group. Conclusion: Progression of IAS during the 2-year observation period appears to be less frequent than previously reported in stroke patients on antiplatelet agents after the acute phase, which could be due to the adequate control of risk factors, and because patients with stroke within 2 weeks after the onset were excluded. The results of the CATHARSIS trial suggest a potential utility of pharmacotherapies with cilostazol plus aspirin as well as of strict control of risk factors for the management of symptomatic IAS. Larger studies with higher statistical power are required to obtain conclusive results

Japanese Surveillance of Neuroendovascular Therapy in JR-NET - Part II. Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Treatment 3. Main Report

This study, following Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Treatment 1 and 2 (JR-NET 1 & 2), shows an annual trend of cases including adverse events and clinical outcomes at 30 days after NET.JR-NET3 was registered by 749 cumulative total number of physicians, certified by the Japanese Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy in 166 centers, between 2010 and 2014. Medical information about the patients was anonymized and retrospectively registered through a website. A total of 40,177 patients were recruited, 632 patients were excluded because data of preprocedural status were not available. So we analyzed 39,545 patients retrospectively. The proportion of octogenarians is increasing year-by-year and 14.7% in 2014 compared with 10.4% in 2010. Most frequent target disease is intracranial aneurysm. For the proportion of the treatment of intracranial aneurysm, 50.0% in 2010, but that has decreased to 44.8% in 2014. However, number of procedures were increased from 3150 in 2010 to 3419 in 2014. Although before the positive clinical evidence of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) was established, the proportion of endovascular treatment for AIS increased 13.8% in 2014 compared with 6.3% in 2010. The number of patients requiring neuroendovascular treatment in Japan is increasing since 2010-2013, but that declined a little in 2014 caused by study operation suspended at the end of 2013. The outcomes of such therapy are clinically acceptable. Details of each type of treatment will be investigated in sub-analyses of the database