Appendix E. Predicted probabilities of use by migrant and resident elk as a function of herbaceous forage biomass at two levels within the home-range scale.

Predicted probabilities of use by migrant and resident elk as a function of herbaceous forage biomass at two levels within the home-range scale

Appendix B. Modeling forage maturation using NDVI and ground maturation models.

Modeling forage maturation using NDVI and ground maturation models

Appendix F. Linear mixed-effects time-series models for forage (herbaceous and shrub) biomass exposure for migrant and resident elk GPS locations, 2002–2004.

Linear mixed-effects time-series models for forage (herbaceous and shrub) biomass exposure for migrant and resident elk GPS locations, 2002–2004

Appendix A. Modeling peak of growing season availability of forage-biomass components for elk.

Modeling peak of growing season availability of forage-biomass components for elk

Appendix C. Estimating growing-season parameters for phenology modeling.

Estimating growing-season parameters for phenology modeling

Appendix D. Individual MODIS-interval quality–quantity regression equations.

Individual MODIS-interval quality–quantity regression equations

Wolf location data

GPS location data for the 6 wolves analysed in the paper. First column contains wolf IDs. Second and third columns contain observed easting and northing coordinates. Fourth and fifth column contain date and time associated with each location

Dependence of efficiency of harvest control with fixed preferences on transmission mechanism TM<i>i</i> (bottom left corner) and preferences (<i>h</i>_<i>Pj</i>, <i>h</i>_<i>Pf</i>, <i>h</i>_<i>Pm</i>1, <i>h</i>_<i>Pm</i>2) shown by line styles.

<p>Non-monotonous behavior arises due to switching in the model: involvement of younger males in mating or too low buck:doe ratio and decline in birth rate. Density dependence is according to (A12), but (A14) with θ = 1 and 2 give indistinguishable plots.</p

Buck:doe and fawn:doe ratios corresponding to constrained optimal harvest preferences in Fig 2.

<p>Buck:doe and fawn:doe ratios corresponding to constrained optimal harvest preferences in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0151039#pone.0151039.g002" target="_blank">Fig 2</a>.</p

Harvest preferences used in calculations in Fig 3.

<p>Harvest preferences used in calculations in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0151039#pone.0151039.g003" target="_blank">Fig 3</a>.</p