4 research outputs found
Effect of cross exercise on quadriceps acceleration reaction time and subjective scores (Lysholm questionnaire) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Abstract Background Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury or reconstruction can cause knee impairments and disability. Knee impairments are related to quadriceps performance – accelerated reaction time (ART) – and disability to performance of daily living activities which is assessed by questionnaires such as the Lysholm knee score. The purposes of this study were to investigate the effect of cross exercise, as supplementary rehabilitation to the early phase of ACL reconstruction: a) on quadriceps ART at the angles 45°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion and, b) on the subjective scores of disability in ACL reconstructed patients. Methods 42 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomly divided into 3 groups, two experimental and one control. All groups followed the same rehabilitation program. The experimental groups followed 8 weeks of cross eccentric exercise (CEE) on the uninjured knee; 3 d/w, and 5 d/w respectively. Quadriceps ART was measured at 45°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion pre and nine weeks post-operatively using an isokinetic dynamometer. Patients also completed pre and post operatively the Lysholm questionnaire whereby subjective scores were recorded. Results Two factor ANOVA showed significant differences in ART at 90° among the groups (F = 4.29, p = 0.02, p Significant differences were also found in the Lysholm score among the groups (F = 4.75, p = 0.01, p Conclusion CEE showed improvements on quadriceps ART at 90° at a sequence of 3 d/w and in the Lysholm score at a sequence of 3 d/w and 5 d/w respectively on ACL reconstructed patients.</p
The clinical and cultural factors in classifying low back pain patients within Greece: a qualitative exploration of Greek health professionals
Rationale, aims and objectives Identifying homogenous subgroups of low
back pain (LBP) patients is considered a priority in musculoskeletal
rehabilitation and is believed to enhance clinical outcomes. In order to
achieve this, the specific features of each subgroup need to be
identified. The aim of this study was to develop a list of clinical and
cultural features that are included in the assessment of LBP patients in
Greece, among health professionals. This ‘list’ will be, utilized in a
clinical study for developing LBP subgroups.
Methods Three focus groups were conducted, each one comprising health
professionals with homogenous characteristics and all coordinated by a
single moderator. There were: 11 physiotherapists (PTs) with clinical
experience in LBP patients, seven PTs specialized in LBP management, and
five doctors with a particular spinal interest. The focus of discussions
was to develop a list of clinical and cultural features that were
important in the examination of LBP. Content analysis was performed by
two researchers.
Results Clinicians and postgraduates developed five categories within
the History (Present Symptoms, History of Symptoms, Function,
Psychosocial, Medical History) and six categories within the Physical
Examination (Observation, Neurological Examination, Active and Passive
Movements, Muscle Features and Palpation). The doctors identified four
categories in History (Symptomatology, Function, Psychosocial, Medical
History) and an additional in Physical Examination (Special Tests). All
groups identified three cultural categories; Attitudes of Health
Professionals, Patients’ Attitudes and Health System influences.
Conclusion An extensive Greek ‘list’ of clinical and cultural features
was developed from the groups’ analysis. Although similarities existed
in most categories, there were several differences across the three
focus groups which will be discussed