Shear bond strength of a "solvent-free" adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems

AIM: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a solvent free self-etch adhesive with solvent containing adhesives. METHODS: Forty-five human teeth were sectioned longitudinally to expose superficial dentin and substrates polished with 600-grit SiC paper. The adhesive area was isolated with a cylindrical Teflon mold 3x4 mm. Fifteen specimens were prepared for each material. Were evaluated a solvent free self-etch adhesive (Bond 1 SF), an ethanol self-etch adhesive (Futurabond M), and a water-acetone-ethanol self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-In-One). All specimens were subjected to an aging procedure by thermo-cycling (5000 cycles). Thirty-six specimens were stressed in shear at a rate of 0.5mm/min. Mean data values were analyzed statistically using the Welch robust analysis of variance and the Games-Howell statistic. Failure patterns were analyzed using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additional more dentin specimens were prepared for SEM. RESULTS: The Bond 1 SF showed the statistically significant lowest SBS to dentin (Welch statistic p<0.001). Failures for Bond 1 SF were mainly adhesive failures with partial cohesive failures in the adhesive resin, while for Futurabond M and Optibond All-In-One were mainly mixed. SEM findings confirm the results. CONCLUSIONS: Eliminating solvents from self-etch adhesive systems may decrease the bonding strength to dentin

Shear bond strength of a "solvent-free" adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems

compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a solvent free self-etch adhesive with solvent containing adhesives. Methods: Forty-five human teeth were sectioned longitudinally to expose superficial dentin and substrates polished with 600-grit SiC paper. The adhesive area was isolated with a cylindrical Teflon mold 3x4 mm. Fifteen specimens were prepared for each material. Were evaluated a solvent free self-etch adhesive (Bond 1 SF), an ethanol self-etch adhesive (Futurabond M), and a water-acetone-ethanol self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-In-One). All specimens were subjected to an aging procedure by thermo-cycling (5000 cycles). Thirty-six specimens were stressed in shear at a rate of 0.5mm/min. Mean data values were analyzed statistically using the Welch robust analysis of variance and the Games-Howell statistic. Failure patterns were analyzed using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additional more dentin specimens were prepared for SEM. Results: The Bond 1 SF showed the statistically significant lowest SBS to dentin (Welch statistic p<0.001). Failures for Bond 1 SF were mainly adhesive failures with partial cohesive failures in the adhesive resin, while for Futurabond M and Optibond All-In-One were mainly mixed. SEM findings confirm the results. Conclusions: Eliminating solvents from self-etch adhesive systems may decrease the bonding strength to dentin

In Vitro Microleakage of class V Composite Restorations prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Carbide BUR

Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the degree of microleakage on enamel and dentin margins of class V cavities prepared with either a high-speed drill or an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm) and to associate their use with a beveling method for the margin

Pulpal responses after application of current adhesive systems to deep cavities

The aim of the present study was to evaluate comparatively the pulpal tissue reactions of four adhesive systems placed in experimental cavities of healthy dog's teeth. Class V cavities with a mean value of remaining dentin thickness (RDT) ranging between 0.55 +/- 0.30-0.68 +/- 0.38 mm were prepared. The cavities were treated with the following adhesive systems: Etch and Prime 3.0 (EP), Single Bond (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), and Prompt L-Pop (PLP). The pulpal tissue responses to dentin adhesives were assessed histopathologically at postoperative periods of 7, 21, and 65 days, and the results were subjected to statistical analysis. A significantly greater adverse inflammatory response was observed with the materials EP and PLP, while a significantly lesser degree of disorganization in the odontoblastic zone was found with the materials SB and CSE, in the postoperative period of 65 days. In addition, a thicker predentin zone was observed where SB material was applied. Application of the selected adhesive systems to non-exposed cavities, with an RDT, which ranged between the above-mentioned rates, was correlated with slight to moderate inflammation and odontoblast reduction depending on the materials used as well as upon the RDT