32 research outputs found

    Computationally Efficient Symbol-Level Precoding Communications Demonstrator

    Get PDF
    We present a precoded multi-user communication test-bed to demonstrate forward link interference mitigation techniques in a multi-beam satellite system scenario which will enable a full frequency reuse scheme. The developed test-bed provides an end-to-end precoding demonstration, which includes a transmitter, a multi-beam satellite channel emulator and user receivers. Each of these parts can be reconfigured accordingly to the desired test scenario. Precoded communications allow full frequency reuse in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel environments, where several coordinated antennas simultaneously transmit to a number of independent receivers. The developed real-time transmission test-bed assist in demonstrating, designing and benchmarking of the new Symbol-Level Precoding (SLP) techniques, where the data information is used, along with the channel state information, in order to exploit the multi-user interference and transform it into useful power at the receiver side. The demonstrated SLP techniques are designed in order to be computationally efficient, and can be generalized to others multi-channel interference scenarios

    The ideal double pedigree protocol to study the interactions between genotype, environment and culture.

    No full text
    <p>This can be simplified in the lab by providing only one type of environment. Each column represents one family and hence one set of parental genes reorganized in different individual genotypes. The colored boxes represent different environments. O<sub>1</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> are siblings. This illustrates the possibility of linking families across environments. Squares and circles are male and female parents and hexagons are offspring. In this design we consider that there are two identified cultures (e.g. song dialects or languages). Sample sizes are set at two which is the minimum necessary to account for residual variance. Two-way arrows indicate partial cross-fostering among environments, families and cultures. The arrows starting and ending on the same family corresponds to controls for the effect of the manipulation where eggs or young are handled, moved over a comparable period of time, then put back in their original nest or habitat. In this cross-foster design all combinations of environment, genotype and culture can be created and replicated. Ideally, some of the cross-fosterings are performed within the same culture/environment/family to test for the manipulation effect. The cross-fosters are then used to build the matrix of cultural distances among individuals, which describes the cultural pedigree (see text). An advantage of the animal model is that it is robust enough to cope with unbalanced designs resulting from the unavoidable death of some individuals.</p

    A cross-fostering experiment uncouples the cultural from the genetic pedigree to apportion the genetic and cultural components of behavioral traits.

    No full text
    <p>Note that L<sup>A</sup> and L<sup>B</sup> are siblings that were cross-fostered between cultures A and B. <i>Superscript</i>: cultures; <i>subscript</i> family of origin, plus identity of the offspring. <i>Black arrows</i>: genetic genealogy; <i>Blue arrows</i>: cultural genealogy. Cross-fostering should be performed as early in life as possible to avoid any social influence. According to this protocol, half of the offspring remain in their nests of origin (NL<sub>X1</sub> and LP<sub>Y2</sub>). Their genetic (black) and cultural (blue) genealogies are thus confounded (arrows labeled 1). In contrast, for the other half of the offspring (NL<sub>X2</sub> and LP<sub>Y1</sub>) the cross-fostering uncouples the genetic (black) from the cultural (blue) genealogy (arrows labeled 2). This allows us to differentiate the respective roles of genetic versus cultural inheritance in resemblance. The comparison of cross-fostered versus non-cross-fostered siblings allows the partitioning of variance between genetic and cultural effects. It is thus crucial to perform partial cross-fostering in which only some of the siblings are cross-fostered.</p

    Overwintering aggregations are part of <i>Hippodamia undecimnotata</i>’s (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) mating system - Fig 2

    No full text
    <p><b>Stages of maturation of the ovaries of <i>Hippodamia undecimnotata</i> in relation to the sampling locations and periods 2013–2014</b> at a) SML, b) LG, and c) MS. In March 2014, only 5 females were sampled at SML due to site destruction.</p

    Assay of sperm cell viability.

    No full text
    <p>Live sperm cells are stained in green (indicated by grey arrows), dead sperm cells are stained in red (indicated by white arrows).</p

    Investigating mating system in a ladybird species

    No full text
    Datasets used to investigate whether mating events occur at overwintering sites in a ladybird species in the contexte of overwintering aggregations. Providing data about sperm cell quantity and viability in males and females (if mated)

    Sperm cells in female spermatheca and <i>bursa copulatrix</i> (sperm cell number/female).

    No full text
    <p>Sperm cell number and viability during the two successive overwintering periods at the 3 study sites.</p

    Overwintering aggregations are part of <i>Hippodamia undecimnotata</i>’s (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) mating system - Fig 3

    No full text
    <p><b>Stages of maturation of the ovaries of <i>Hippodamia undecimnotata</i> in relation to the sampling locations and periods 2014–2015</b> at a) SML, b) LG, and c) MS.</p
    corecore