469 research outputs found

    Adequate Moods for Non-EU Decision Making in a Sequential Framework

    Get PDF
    In a dynamic (sequential) framework, departures from the independence axiom (IND) are reputed to induce violations of dynamic consistency (DC), which may in turn have undesirable normative consequences. This result thus questions the normative acceptability of non expected-utility (non-EU) models, which precisely relax IND. This paper pursues a twofold objective. The main one is to discuss the normative conclusion: we show that usual arguments linking violations of DC to departures from IND are actually based on specific (but usually remaining implicit) assumptions which may rightfully be released, so that it is actually possible for a non-EU maximizer to be dynamically consistent and thus avoid normative difficulties. Our second objective is to introduce a kind of 'reality principle' (through two other evaluation criteria) in order to mitigate the normative requirement when examining adequate moods for non-EU decision making.Non-expected utility, sequential choice, dynamic consistency, money pump, consequentialism.

    The shape of the utility function under risk in the loss domain and the "ruinous losses" hypothesis: some experimental results

    Get PDF
    This paper reports some preliminary experimental results as regards the shape of the utility function for losses when elicited over a wide interval of consequences. Individual utility functions are elicited using the trade-off method, which, unlike standard elicitation procedures, is robust to probability weighting (and avoids most cognitive biases). Even though most utility functions exhibit the usual convex shape, nearly 25% of them appear to be inverse-S shaped, with convexity over moderate losses changing to concavity as losses grow. Though not conclusive (due mainly to the small size of our subject pool), this result brings some new support to the old idea that ruinous or unacceptable losses may induce some abrupt change in the shape of the utility function. Most importantly, it paves the way for more systematic investigation of the "ruinous losses" hypothesis.utility under risk, large losses, ruin, trade-off method, individual decision making under risk

    Cooperation, the power of a single word. Some experimental evidence on wording and gender effects in a Game of Chicken

    Get PDF
    Wording has been widely shown to affect decision making. In this paper, we investigate experimentally whether and to what extent, cooperative behaviour in a Game of Chicken may be impated by a very basic change in the labelling of the strategies. Our within-subject experimental design involves two treatments. The only difference between them is that we introduce either a socially-oriented wording (‘I cooperate'/‘I do not cooperate') or colours (red/blue) to designate strategies. The level of cooperation appears to be higher in the socially-oriented context, but only when the uncertainty as regards the type of the partner is manipulated, and especially among females.Social dilemma, Game of Chicken, cooperation, wording effects, gender effects.

    Comunidades y negocios sociales: hacia una propuesta sistémica

    Get PDF
    The inability of Economics to internalize environmental and social externalities makes its orientation to serve essentially to remunerate the capital through a debt-based economic growth; thus moving away from its primary goal: a correct distribution of scarce resources in order to satisfy human needs. As a consequence, unless a dramatic change in the path of development is implemented, we are leading it to an abyss. The relocation of economies and lifestyles, linked to the rise of social businesses and to the potential of cooperatives as a way of equitable distribution of wealth, inspires an opportunity to redirect human evolution to the creation of resilience generating wellbeing to tackle the increasing threats that the world is facing. There are hundreds of cases in which communities or neighborhoods are assuming an increasing role in the decisions that affect their own future. The key to an encouraging future might lie in providing these socially and environmentally desirable approaches with economical viability

    Expérimentation de laboratoire et économie :<br />Contre quelques idées reçues et faux problÚmes

    Get PDF
    International audienceDespite its increasing use and legitimacy, experimental methodology in economics has been subject to some criticism, an extreme version of which concludes to its irrelevance to its object. With no claim to exhaustiveness, the paper presents and discusses some arguments that we consider to be questionable – because they are suspected to hide either a strategic temptation when facing unpleasant experimental results or a fallacious view of experimental goals and potentialities or even an inadequate approach of economic reality itself – and shows that they are at best locally or partially valid. This allows us to remind the reader of the purposes of the experimental method, of its potentialities and limits as well as of some necessary precautions to adopt.En dĂ©pit de son utilisation et de sa lĂ©gitimitĂ© croissantes, l'expĂ©rimentation de laboratoire en Ă©conomie fait parfois l'objet de critiques qui peuvent aller jusqu'Ă  remettre en cause la pertinence de l'outil. Sans prĂ©tendre Ă  l'exhaustivitĂ©, nous revenons sur ceux de ces arguments qui revĂȘtent selon nous un caractĂšre discutable (parce qu'ils nous semblent selon les cas tĂ©moigner soit d'une tentation stratĂ©gique face Ă  des rĂ©sultats expĂ©rimentaux considĂ©rĂ©s comme gĂȘnants, soit d'une vision erronĂ©e des finalitĂ©s et potentialitĂ©s de la dĂ©marche, soit encore d'une lecture partielle de la rĂ©alitĂ© Ă©conomique elle-mĂȘme) afin de montrer que leur validitĂ© est au mieux locale et partielle. Nous en profitons pour rappeler les finalitĂ©s de la mĂ©thode expĂ©rimentale, circonscrire son domaine d'application (i.e. ses potentialitĂ©s et limites) et indiquer quelques prĂ©cautions d'utilisation

    The shape of the utility function under risk in the loss domain and the 'ruinous losses' hypothesis: some experimental results

    Get PDF
    International audienceThis paper reports some preliminary experimental results as regards the shape of the utility function for losses when elicited over a wide interval of consequences. Individual utility functions are elicited using the trade-off method, which, unlike standard elicitation procedures, is robust to probability weighting (and avoids most cognitive biases). Even though most utility functions exhibit the usual convex shape, nearly 25% of them appear to be inverse-S shaped, with convexity over moderate losses changing to concavity as losses grow. Though not conclusive (due mainly to the small size of our subject pool), this result brings some new support to the old idea that ruinous or unacceptable losses may induce some abrupt change in the shape of the utility function. Most importantly, it paves the way for more systematic investigation of the "ruinous losses" hypothesis

    Adequate Moods for Non-EU Decision Making in a Sequential Framework: A synthetic Discussion

    Get PDF
    derniĂšre version avant publicationIn a dynamic (sequential) framework, departures from the independence axiom (IND) are reputed to induce violations of dynamic consistency (DC), which may in turn have undesirable normative consequences. This result thus questions the normative acceptability of non expected-utility (non-EU) models, which precisely relax IND. This paper pursues a twofold objective. The main one is to discuss the normative conclusion: we show that usual arguments linking violations of DC to departures from IND are actually based on specific (but usually remaining implicit) assumptions which may rightfully be released, so that it is actually possible for a non-EU maximizer to be dynamically consistent and thus avoid normative difficulties. Our second objective is to introduce a kind of 'reality principle' (through two other evaluation criteria) in order to mitigate the normative requirement when examining adequate moods for non-EU decision making

    Expérimentation de laboratoire et économie : contre quelques idées reçues et faux problÚmes

    Get PDF
    En dĂ©pit de son utilisation et de sa lĂ©gitimitĂ© croissantes, l’expĂ©rimentation de laboratoire en Ă©conomie fait parfois l’objet de critiques qui peuvent aller jusqu’à la remise en cause de la pertinence de l’outil. Sans prĂ©tendre Ă  l’exhaustivitĂ©, nous revenons sur ceux de ces arguments qui revĂȘtent selon nous un caractĂšre discutable (parce qu’ils nous semblent selon les cas tĂ©moigner soit d’une tentation stratĂ©gique face Ă  des rĂ©sultats expĂ©rimentaux considĂ©rĂ©s comme gĂȘnants, soit d’une vision erronĂ©e des finalitĂ©s et potentialitĂ©s de la dĂ©marche, soit encore d’une lecture partielle de la rĂ©alitĂ© Ă©conomique elle-mĂȘme) afin de montrer que leur validitĂ© est au mieux locale et partielle. Nous en profitons pour rappeler les finalitĂ©s de la mĂ©thode expĂ©rimentale, circonscrire son domaine d’application (c.-Ă -d. ses potentialitĂ©s et limites) et indiquer quelques prĂ©cautions d’utilisation.Despite its increasing use and legitimacy, experimental methodology in economics has been subject to some criticism, an extreme version of which concludes to its irrelevance to its object. With no claim to exhaustiveness, the paper presents and discusses some arguments that we consider to be questionable – because they are suspected to hide either a strategic temptation when facing unpleasant experimental results or a fallacious view of experimental goals and potentialities, or even an inadequate approach of economic reality itself – and shows that they are at best locally or partially valid. This allows us to remind the reader of the purposes of the experimental method, of its potentialities and limits as well as of some basic precautions to adopt
    • 

    corecore