3 research outputs found

    Diseño de la arquitectura funcional de control para un robot móvil de exploración espacial

    Get PDF
    El objetivo principal de este estudio es desarrollar un sistema de navegación listo para ser integrado en un robot de exploración de exteriores. Para ello, será necesario implementar un mecanismo capaz de estimar la posición en tiempo real del robot explorador en un entorno de tres dimensiones (3D), que simulará una superficie como podría ser la de cualquier cuerpo del Sistema Solar. Para ello se van a combinar los datos proporcionados por varios dispositivos capaces de recoger información sobre la localización de objetos, cada uno de ellos implementado por distintas tecnologías, con el fin de obtener una estimación precisa de la posición del robot. Además, se implementará un algoritmo de control de movimiento que permitirá al robot alcanzar de forma autónoma un punto destino de la superficie a partir de las coordenadas locales ligadas a dicho punto. Este control se llevará a cabo por medio de un algoritmo que permitirá modificar su comportamiento dependiendo de los requerimientos de cada situación, pudiendo proporcionar movimientos más precisos para trazar una trayectoria ideal en términos de longitud recorrida, o movimientos más rápidos, que permitirán al robot alcanzar el punto destino en el menor tiempo posible, al precio de recorrer una distancia mayor. Dado que el robot establece una comunicación inalámbrica con la base, será posible variar en todo momento el punto destino a alcanzar de forma remota.Ingeniería Telemátic

    Position control of a shape memory alloy actuator using a four-term bilinear PID controller

    Get PDF
    Shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators have a number of appealing features, such as their low weight or their high force-to-weight ratio, that make them a potential alternative to traditional actuation technologies in fields such as space applications, surgical devices or wearable robotics. In this paper, a type of bilinear controller consisting of a conventional PID controller cascaded with a bilinear compensator, known as BPID, is proposed. Bilinear controllers are a subset of nonlinear controllers, which is why the BPID may be a promising alternative to control the position of a SMA actuator. Nonlinear control techniques are commonly applied to control SMA actuators, because of their nonlinear behavior caused by thermal hysteresis. The BPID controller is simpler and easier to implement than other nonlinear control strategies, which makes it a very appealing candidate to control SMA actuators. The performance of the BPID controller has been compared with other two controllers, a conventional PID and a commuted feed-forward PIPD, controlling a real SMA actuator. To this end, a set of five tests has been defined, in which the controlled actuator must follow a series of position references. From these tests, the position and error of the actuator have been plotted, and a series of metrics has been computed to have quantitative measurements of the performance of the three controllers. It is shown that, in most of the experiments, the BPID has a better performance than the other two tested controllers, especially tracking step references. However, the power consumption is slightly higher when the actuator is controlled with this strategy, although-the difference is minimal. Also, the BPID imposes greater energy variations to the SMA actuator, which might affect its service life. Overall, the BPID controller has proved to be a viable alternative to control SMA actuators.The research leading to these results has received funding from the STAMAS (Smart technology for artificial muscle applications in space) project, funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7) (grant number 312815), and from the RoboHealth (DPI2013-47944-C4-3-R) Spanish research project

    Subcutaneous anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin for prevention of disease in asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trialResearch in context

    No full text
    Summary: Background: Anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin (hIG) can provide standardized and controlled antibody content. Data from controlled clinical trials using hIG for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 outpatients have not been reported. We assessed the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin 20% (C19-IG20%) compared to placebo in preventing development of symptomatic COVID-19 in asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: We did a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, in asymptomatic unvaccinated adults (≥18 years of age) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days between April 28 and December 27, 2021. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive a blinded subcutaneous infusion of 10 mL with 1 g or 2 g of C19-IG20%, or an equivalent volume of saline as placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who remained asymptomatic through day 14 after infusion. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of individuals who required oxygen supplementation, any medically attended visit, hospitalisation, or ICU, and viral load reduction and viral clearance in nasopharyngeal swabs. Safety was assessed as the proportion of patients with adverse events. The trial was terminated early due to a lack of potential benefit in the target population in a planned interim analysis conducted in December 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT04847141. Findings: 461 individuals (mean age 39.6 years [SD 12.8]) were randomized and received the intervention within a mean of 3.1 (SD 1.27) days from a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. In the prespecified modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only participants who received a subcutaneous infusion, the primary outcome occurred in 59.9% (91/152) of participants receiving 1 g C19-IG20%, 64.7% (99/153) receiving 2 g, and 63.5% (99/156) receiving placebo (difference in proportions 1 g C19-IG20% vs. placebo, −3.6%; 95% CI -14.6% to 7.3%, p = 0.53; 2 g C19-IG20% vs placebo, 1.1%; −9.6% to 11.9%, p = 0.85). None of the secondary clinical efficacy endpoints or virological endpoints were significantly different between study groups. Adverse event rate was similar between groups, and no severe or life-threatening adverse events related to investigational product infusion were reported. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that administration of subcutaneous human hyperimmune immunoglobulin C19-IG20% to asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection was safe but did not prevent development of symptomatic COVID-19. Funding: Grifols
    corecore