Influence of cranial radiotherapy on outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with contemporary therapy

Purpose We sought to determine whether cranial radiotherapy (CRT) is necessary to prevent relapse in any subgroup of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Patients and Methods We obtained aggregate data on relapse and survival outcomes for 16,623 patients age 1 to 18 years old with newly diagnosed ALL treated between 1996 and 2007 by 10 cooperative study groups from around the world. The proportion of patients eligible for prophylactic CRT varied from 0%to 33% by trial and was not related to the proportion eligible for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in first complete remission. Using a random effects model, with CRT as a dichotomous covariate, we performed a single-arm metaanalysis to compare event-free survival and cumulative incidence of isolated or any CNS relapse and isolated bone marrow relapse in high-risk subgroups of patients who either did or did not receive CRT. Results Although there was significant heterogeneity in all outcome end points according to trial, CRT was associated with a reduced risk of relapse only in the small subgroup of patients with overt CNS disease at diagnosis, who had a significantly lower risk of isolated CNS relapse (4% with CRT v 17% without CRT; P = .02) and a trend toward lower risk of any CNS relapse (7% with CRT v 17% without CRT; P = .09). However, this group had a relatively high rate of events regardless of whether or not they received CRT (32% [95% CI, 26% to 39%] v 34% [95% CI, 19% to 54%]; P = .8). Conclusion CRT does not have an impact on the risk of relapse in children with ALL treated on contemporary protocols

Human MLL/KMT2A gene exhibits a second breakpoint cluster region for recurrent MLL–USP2 fusions

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq: PQ-2017#305529/2017-0Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG: MA 1876/12-1Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung: 88881.136091/2017-01RVO-VFN64165, 26/203.214/20172018.070.1Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, AIRC: IG2015, 17593Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPESCancer Australia: PdCCRS1128727CancerfondenBarncancerfondenVetenskapsrÃ¥det, VRCrafoordska StiftelsenKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseLund University Medical Faculty FoundationXiamen University, XMU2014S0617-74-30019C7838/A15733Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, SNSF: 31003A_140913CNIBInstitut National Du Cancer, INCaR01 NCI CA167824National Institutes of Health, NIH: S10OD0185222016/2017, 02R/2016AU 525/1-1Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung, DKTK70112951Smithsonian Institution, SIIsrael Science Foundation, ISFAustrian Science Fund, FWF: W1212SFB-F06107, SFB-F06105Acknowledgements BAL received a fellowship provided by CAPES and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (#88881.136091/2017-01). ME is supported by CNPq (PQ-2017#305529/2017-0) and FAPERJ-JCNE (#26/203.214/2017) research scholarships, and ZZ by grant RVO-VFN64165. GC is supported by the AIRC Investigator grant IG2015 grant no. 17593 and RS by Cancer Australia grant PdCCRS1128727. This work was supported by grants to RM from the “Georg und Franziska Speyer’sche Hochsschulstiftung”, the “Wilhelm Sander foundation” (grant 2018.070.1) and DFG grant MA 1876/12-1.Acknowledgements This work was supported by The Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation, The Swedish Cancer Society, The Swedish Research Council, The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, BioCARE, The Crafoord Foundation, The Per-Eric and Ulla Schyberg Foundation, The Nilsson-Ehle Donations, The Wiberg Foundation, and Governmental Funding of Clinical Research within the National Health Service. Work performed at the Center for Translational Genomics, Lund University has been funded by Medical Faculty Lund University, Region Skåne and Science for Life Laboratory, Sweden.Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation 2016S016 China and Putian city Natural Science Foundation 2014S06(2), Fujian Province, China. Alexey Ste-panov and Alexander Gabibov were supported by Russian Scientific Foundation project No. 17-74-30019. Jinqi Huang was supported by a doctoral fellowship from Xiamen University, China.Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 31003A_140913; OH) and the Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Network, Cardiff ECMCI, grant C7838/A15733. We thank N. Carpino for the Sts-1/2 double-KO mice.Acknowledgements This work was supported by the French National Cancer Institute (INCA) and the Fondation Française pour la Recherche contre le Myélome et les Gammapathies (FFMRG), the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM), NCI R01 NCI CA167824 and a generous donation from Matthew Bell. This work was supported in part through the computational resources and staff expertise provided by Scientific Computing at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Research reported in this paper was supported by the Office of Research Infrastructure of the National Institutes of Health under award number S10OD018522. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank the Association des Malades du Myélome Multiple (AF3M) for their continued support and participation. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer / World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer / World Health Organization.We are indebted to all members of our groups for useful discussions and for their critical reading of the manuscript. Special thanks go to Silke Furlan, Friederike Opitz and Bianca Killing. F.A. is supported by the Deutsche For-schungsgemeinschaft (DFG, AU 525/1-1). J.H. has been supported by the German Children’s Cancer Foundation (Translational Oncology Program 70112951), the German Carreras Foundation (DJCLS 02R/2016), Kinderkrebsstiftung (2016/2017) and ERA PerMed GEPARD. Support by Israel Science Foundation, ERA-NET and Science Ministry (SI). A. B. is supported by the German Consortium of Translational Cancer Research, DKTK. We are grateful to the Jülich Supercomputing Centre at the Forschungszemtrum Jülich for granting computing time on the supercomputer JURECA (NIC project ID HKF7) and to the “Zentrum für Informations-und Medientechnologie” (ZIM) at the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf for providing computational support to H. G. The study was performed in the framework of COST action CA16223 “LEGEND”.Funding The work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund FWF grant SFB-F06105 to RM and SFB-F06107 to VS and FWF grant W1212 to VS

Outcome of infants younger than 1 year with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the interfant-06 protocol: Results from an international phase III randomized study

PURPOSE Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterized by KMT2A (MLL) gene rearrangements and coexpression of myeloid markers. The Interfant-06 study, comprising 18 national and international study groups, tested whether myeloid-style consolidation chemotherapy is superior to lymphoid style, the role of stemcell transplantation (SCT), and which factors had independent prognostic value. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three risk groups were defined: low risk (LR): KMT2A germline; high risk (HR): KMT2A-rearranged and older than 6 months with WBC count 300 3 109/L or more or a poor prednisone response; and medium risk (MR): all other KMT2A-rearranged cases. Patients in the MR and HR groups were randomly assigned to receive the lymphoid course low-dose cytosine arabinoside [araC], 6-mercaptopurine, cyclophosphamide (IB) or experimental myeloid courses, namely araC, daunorubicin, etoposide (ADE) and mitoxantrone, araC, etoposide (MAE). RESULTS A total of 651 infants were included, with 6-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival of 46.1% (SE, 2.1) and 58.2% (SE, 2.0). In West European/North American groups, 6-year EFS and overall survival were 49.4% (SE, 2.5) and 62.1% (SE, 2.4), which were 10% to 12% higher than in other countries. The 6-year probability of disease-free survival was comparable for the randomized arms (ADE1MAE 39.3% [SE 4.0; n = 169] v IB 36.8% [SE, 3.9; n = 161]; log-rank P = .47). The 6-year EFS rate of patients in the HR group was 20.9% (SE, 3.4) with the intention to undergo SCT; only 46% of them received SCT, because many had early events. KMT2A rearrangement was the strongest prognostic factor for EFS, followed by age, WBC count, and prednisone response. CONCLUSION Early intensification with postinduction myeloid-type chemotherapy courses did not significantly improve outcome for infant ALL compared with the lymphoid-type course IB. Outcome for infant ALL in Interfant- 06 did not improve compared with that in Interfant-99

RAS pathway mutations as a predictive biomarker for treatment adaptation in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

RAS pathway mutations have been linked to relapse and chemotherapy resistance in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, comprehensive data on the frequency and prognostic value of subclonal mutations in well-defined subgroups using highly sensitive and quantitative methods are lacking. Targeted deep sequencing of 13 RAS pathway genes was performed in 461 pediatric BCP-ALL cases at initial diagnosis and in 19 diagnos

Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing thiopurines in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Mercaptopurine has been used in continuing treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia since the mid 1950s. Recent advances in the understanding of thiopurine pharmacology indicated that thioguanine (TG) might be more effective than mercaptopurine (MP). The US and UK cooperative groups began randomised thiopurine trials and agreed prospectively to a meta-analysis. All randomised trials of TG versus MP were sought, and data on individual patients were analysed by standard methods. Combining three trials (from US, UK and Germany), the overall event-free survival (EFS) was not significantly improved with TG (odds ratio (OR)=0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.03). Apparent differences in results between trials may be partly explained by the different types of patients studied. The larger treatment effect reported in males in the US trial was confirmed in the other trials. There was heterogeneity between sex/age subgroups (P=0.001), with significant EFS benefit of TG only observed for males aged <10 years old (OR=0.70; 0.58-0.84), although this did not result in a significant difference in overall survival (OR=0.83; 0.62-1.10). Additional toxicity occurs with TG. Mercaptopurine remains the standard thiopurine of choice, but further study of TG may be warranted to determine whether it could benefit particular subgroups