Ocularcentrism and deaf people : a social photography project.

SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:DX193175 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo

Teachers with Special Needs. De-Psychiatrization of Children in Schools

Psychiatrization not only affects adults. Ever more children in Western countries are being diagnosed with a mental disorder of behavior, such as ADHD. Children may often be labelled with the best intentions, for example in order to be able to provide them with suitable care and guidance. However, this labelling can have exclusionary effects and often entails the consequence that important discussion about contextual factors that give rise to (the perception of) unwelcome behavior or academic underperformance rarely, if at all, takes place. In this article we contend that although children are of central concern to schools and the design of pupils’ education, it is important not to make pupils the sole owner of problems that arise. It is therefore high time that a far more critical normative stance towards inclusive education is taken, in which the presently widespread biomedical approach is met with a school community response that focuses not on the nature of individual disorders but on the special need for additional capacity that schools and teachers have in meeting (perceived) deviant behaviors and emotions and/or academic underperformance. We argue that teaching should not set out to remedy individual diagnoses, but that teachers should be supported to extend their professional competence to the benefit of all pupils

From children to teachers with special needs

Inclusief onderwijs betekent dat alle kinderen op een reguliere school in hun eigen buurt onderwijs volgen. In Nederland zijn verschillende pogingen gedaan om dit in de praktijk te brengen: het Weer Samen Naar School beleid, de Leerlinggebonden Financiering (de rugzakjes) en, meest recentelijk, de wet op Passend Onderwijs. Al deze uitwerkingen zijn echter gericht op het individuele model van inclusief onderwijs, met als afwijkend ervaren kenmerken of eigenschappen van kinderen als uitgangspunt. Hiermee is eerder meer exclusie dan inclusie bewerkstelligd. Dit artikel pleit voor het sociale model van inclusie. Scholen zijn dan ingericht op omgaan met diversiteit en bieden een context waarin geen individuele barrières bestaan voor deelname aan onderwijs. Een eerste wezenlijke stap om de focus van individueel naar het sociaal vormgeven van inclusief onderwijs te verleggen, is om voortaan te spreken van leerkrachten in plaats van kinderen met speciale onderwijsbehoeften.Inclusive education means that all pupils attend school in their locality. In The Netherlands various subsequent national education policies aimed towards this goal. These policies have however pursued an individual model of inclusive education, in which personal attributes taken to be special were the point of departure. The outcome has sooner been more exclusion than more inclusion. In this article we advocate that by re-designing education around handling diversity and so creating settings in which individual barriers to participation are absent, a social model of inclusion is better able to achieve true inclusion. A first significant step in moving away from individual towards the social shaping of inclusive education is to henceforth speak of teachers’ special professional needs instead of pupils with special needs.</p

A baseline survey for capturing the hearing ability and hearing disability of students at the universities of Oldenburg, Groningen and the University of applied sciences Utrecht

Mittels einer Anfang 2011 durchgeführten Online-Erhebung wurden Studierende an den Universitäten Oldenburg, Groningen und der Hochschule Utrecht in Bezug auf die Hörsituation an ihrer Bildungseinrichtung befragt. Die Erhebung verfolgte das Ziel, den Anteil der Studierenden mit einer Hörbeeinträchtigung an den genannten Standorten differenziert zu erfassen. Eine statistische Analyse der Daten ergab, dass an allen drei Einrichtungen mehr als 25 Prozent der Studierenden von einer Beeinträchtigung im Hören betroffen waren, wobei eine Geräuschempfindlichkeit die am häufigsten genannte Hörbeeinträchtigung darstellte. (DIPF/Orig.)Data of hearing in university context based situations were collected in an online survey by the universities of Oldenburg and Groningen and the University of Applied Sciences Utrecht. The study examined the subjective hearing ability of all students including the numbers of students with hearing disabilities. The results show that 25 percent of the participants mention at least one kind of hearing-disability. Hypersensitivity to sound is named first as of the main hearing-disabilities. (DIPF/Orig.

The advantages of an ADHD classification from the perspective of teachers

In Western countries, the number of ADHD diagnoses and medical treatments of children has risen spectacularly over the last decennia, as has the amount of criticism about this trend. Various studies have shown that children receiving an ADHD classification often follow from initial signals that were raised in a school context. Hence, it becomes important to investigate precisely what advantages attach to ADHD classification in educational practice. In this qualitative study, 30 teachers were interviewed about their experiences and views of ADHD. The results suggest that a small number of interviewees sees no advantages to ADHD classification: the classification does not practically help them as teachers, they are familiar with the drawbacks of ADHD classification, and they take issue with the idea of labelling children. The greater number of interviewees, however, suggest ambivalence about ADHD classification: they are aware of its drawbacks while experiencing mainly advantages. According to the interviewees, ADHD classification explains undesirable behaviours and disappointing academic achievement. Classification thereby removes blame from pupils, parents and teachers, and so can be a starting point for productive agreement and collaboration. We will discuss the implications of these findings in the light of the concept of reification, child-centred problematisation and the development of more inclusive education

What children and young people learn about ADHD from youth information books: A text analysis of nine books on ADHD available in Dutch

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is not a singular concept. For the purposes of this study, understandings of ADHD are assumed also to spread along a conceptual dimension that includes some combination of biomedical and psychosocial knowledge. Biomedically, ADHD may be considered a somatic affliction causing inattention and hyperactivity, amenable to pharmaceutical treatment. Psychosocially, ADHD ranks among adverse behaviour patterns that are amenable to psychosocial and pedagogical intervention. Considering both biomedical and psychosocial factors are associated with the ADHD construct, it seems self-evident that young people should be offered information that gives equal consideration to both ways of addressing ADHD, but the question is just how balanced the information available to young people is. This study investigated nine information books on ADHD available in the Netherlands in Dutch, aimed at children and young people up to age 17. Thirteen perspective-dependent text elements were identified in qualitative content analysis. Eight attributes associate with a biomedical view: ADHD as cause, biological factors, clinical diagnosis, brain abnormality, medication, neurofeedback, heritability and persistence. Five text elements associate with a psychosocial view: ADHD as perceived behaviour, environmental factors, descriptive diagnosis, behavioural intervention and normalisation. The most frequent text passages encountered describe ADHD as a brain abnormality, along with medical and behavioural treatment. Providing the main focus for information in eight out of nine books, biomedical information about ADHD predominates in the available youth information books, while psychosocial information about ADHD is far less well covered

Teachers' perceptions of behavioral problems in Dutch primary education pupils:The role of relative age

A growing number of studies suggest that relatively young behavior of pupils gives them a much greater likelihood of being diagnosed with a disorder such as ADHD. This 'relative age effect' has also been demonstrated for special educational needs, learning difficulties, being bullied, and so on. The current study investigated the relationship between relative age of pupils in primary education and teachers' perception of their behavior. The study sample included 1973 pupils, aged between 6 and 12. Six linear mixed models were carried out with birth day in a year as predictor variable and 'total problem score', 'problems with hyperactivity', 'behavioral problems', 'emotional problems', 'problems with peers' and 'pro-social behavior' as dependent variables. Random intercepts were added for school and teacher level. Cluster-mean centering disaggregated between-school effects and within-school effects. We found no associations between relative age of pupils and teacher perceptions of their behavior. Several explanations are postulated to account for these findings which contradict prior studies on relative age effects

The sound of study:Student experiences of listening in the university soundscape

The students from three universities (Groningen, Oldenburg and the University of Applied Sciences in Utrecht) were surveyed on the experience of hearing and listening in their study. Included in the online survey were established questionnaires on hearing loss, tinnitus, hyperacusis, a subscale on psychosocial strain resulting from impaired hearing and a questionnaire about students’ perceptions of listening ease in study environments. Results from the 10,466 students who completed the survey (13% response rate) are highlighted, with particular attention to listening ease and measures proposed by students for improving it. A consequence from our findings is that more effective classroom practice may be won if study soundscapes can be improved, while universities might exercise greater inclusive responsibility for study as high quality sensory experience for the benefit of all students

Do troublesome pupils impact teacher perception of the behaviour of their classmates?

The widely supported wish for more inclusive education places ever greater expectations on teachers’ abilities to teach all children, including those with special needs and challenging behaviours. The present study aimed at the question whether teachers judge pupil behaviour more negatively if there are more children with difficult behaviour in class. The teachers of 184 classes in 31 regular primary schools were asked to complete the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-L) for 3649 pupils. Six linear mixed models were carried out with as independent variable the number of pupils that teachers perceived to have ‘abnormal behaviour’, and the class mean without these pupils as the dependent variable. For all SDQ-L subscales – emotional problems, behavioural problems, problems with hyperactivity, problems with peers, poor prosocial behaviour and total problems – the number of pupils perceived as problematic was associated with less favourable teacher perceptions of the rest of the class. The results of this study are a plea for a contextual perspective on pupil behaviour in class, both where teachers are asked to report on individual pupils, as well as where interventions are done on emotional and behavioural problems in class