7 research outputs found

    Right intra-atrial catheter placement for hemodialysis in patients with multiple venous failure

    No full text
    PubMed ID: 22280164The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct right atrial catheter insertion for hemodialysis in patients with multiple venous access failure. We retrospectively evaluated the charts of 27 patients with multiple venous access failure who had intra-atrial dialysis catheter placement between October 2005 and October 2010 in our clinic. Permanent right atrial dialysis catheters were placed through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy under intratracheal general anesthesia in all patients. Demographics of the cases, the patency rates of hemodialysis via atrial catheterization, existence of any catheter thrombosis, and catheter-related infections were documented and used in statistical analysis. Seventeen women (63%) and 10 men (37%) with the mean age of 59.0±7.1 years (47-71) were enrolled in this study. Chronic renal failure was diagnosed for the mean of 78.9±24.3 months (33-130). Five patients (18.5%) died. Ventricular fibrillation and myocardial infarction were the causes of death in the early postoperative period in two patients. Two of the remaining three patients died because of cerebrovascular events, and one patient died because of an unknown cause. Ten patients (37%) had been using anticoagulate agents (warfarin) because of concomitant disorders such as deep vein thrombosis, operated valve disease, and arrhythmias. Catheter thrombosis and malfunction was determined in three cases (11.1%). Intra-atrial hemodialysis catheterization is a safe and effective life-saving measure for the patients with multiple venous failure and without any possibility of peritoneal dialysis or renal transplantation. © 2012 The Authors. Hemodialysis International © 2012 International Society for Hemodialysis

    Left ventricular assist device implantation in heart failure patients with a left ventricular thrombus

    No full text
    PubMed ID: 23622612Background: In this report, we share our experience with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in cases with a left ventricular (LV) thrombus. Method: Over the 3 years, more than 100 end-stage heart failure cases have been treated with LVAD implantation in our center, including 6 patients with a LV thrombus. Three were detected using preoperative transthoracic echocardiography. Fifty percent of the patients had dilated cardiomyopathy and the remaining cases had an ischemic etiology. Double inotropic support with dopamine and dobutamine was used in all, with 3 drugs with the addition of adrenaline in 2 patients. In 4 cases we implanted the HeartWare Ventricular Assist System (HeartWare, Inc., Miramar, Fla, United States) and in the remaining 2 patients, the Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist device (Berlin Heart AG, Berlin, Germany) for biventricular support. In 1 patient the apical ventriculotomy was extended to remove an intertrabecular thrombosis and ventricular septal surface covered with a dacron patch to minimize the thrombogenic potential. Results: Two patients died due to sepsis and multiorgan failure. None of the patients experienced a neurological event, pump thrombosis, or pump malfunction. Two subjects underwent re-explorations due to hemorrhage. Two candidates underwent successfull transplantation without any evidence of thrombosis in the explanted heart or device. Conclusion: We believe that patients with a LV thrombus and preserved right ventricular function are good candidates for implantation of a LVAD after removing the intracavitary thrombus. © 2013 Elsevier Inc

    The effect of donor ischemic time on mortality in heart transplanted patients

    No full text
    WOS: 000334902700001Background: This study aims to evaluate the effects of donor ischemic time on mortality in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Methods: Between March 1998 and September 2012, 172 patients (135 males, 37 females; mean age 39.7 +/- 14.6 years; range 5 to 65 years) who underwent heart transplantation in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the graft ischemic time, including being equal or over 200 minutes (group 1) and under 200 minutes (group 2). The possible relationship between donor ischemic time and mortality was investigated during the early, mid, and long-term follow-up period. Results: The mean donor age and follow-up were 29.9 +/- 11.8 years, and 1,295.0 +/- 1,249.1 days, respectively. The mean overall donor ischemic time was 181.7 +/- 61.2 mm with 244.0 +/- 36.9 min in group 1 and 139.0 +/- 30.1 mm in group 2. Although group 1 had higher intraoperative mortality rates (p=0.048), there was no statistical significance in postoperative mortality between two study groups. Each study group was divided into three subgroups with respect of donor age (= 40 years) and no statistically significant difference was found in overall mortality rates among six study subgroups (p=0.307). Conclusion: Improvements in myocardial protection and perioperative management procedures lead to increased survival rates in patients with heart transplantation. Donor heart preservation, operation procedures and the preoperative status of the recipients are considered more important risk factors on mortality after heart transplantation than donor ischemic time alone

    Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Heart Failure Patients With a Left Ventricular Thrombus

    No full text
    9th Congress of the Turkish-Transplantation-Centers-Coordination-Association (TTCCA) -- SEP 26-29, 2012 -- Bursa, TURKEYWOS: 000318457000044PubMed ID: 23622612Background. In this report, we share our experience with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in cases with a left ventricular (LV) thrombus. Method. Over the 3 years, more than 100 end-stage heart failure cases have been treated with LVAD implantation in our center, including 6 patients with a LV thrombus. Three were detected using preoperative transthoracic echocardiography. Fifty percent of the patients had dilated cardiomyopathy and the remaining cases had an ischemic etiology. Double inotropic support with dopamine and dobutamine was used in all, with 3 drugs with the addition of adrenaline in 2 patients. In 4 cases we implanted the Heart Ware Ventricular Assist System (Heart Ware, Inc., Miramar, Fla, United States) and in the remaining 2 patients, the Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist device (Berlin Heart AG, Berlin, Germany) for biventricular support. In 1 patient the apical ventriculotomy was extended to remove an intertrabecular thrombosis and ventricular septal surface covered with a dacron patch to minimize the thrombogenic potential. Results. Two patients died due to sepsis and multiorgan failure. None of the patients experienced a neurological event, pump thrombosis, or pump malfunction. Two subjects underwent re-explorations due to hemorrhage. Two candidates underwent successfull transplantation without any evidence of thrombosis in the explanted heart or device. Conclusion. We believe that patients with a LV thrombus and preserved right ventricular function are good candidates for implantation of a LVAD after removing the intracavitary thrombus.Turkish Transplantat Ctr Coordinat Assoc (TTCCA

    Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow blood pumps on reducing pulmonary artery pressure in patients with fixed pulmonary hypertension.

    No full text
    WOS: 000325082500005PubMed ID: 24033601Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is considered as a risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Recently, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has been increasingly used in reducing pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) in patients with PH unresponsive to medical therapy. Herein, we aimed to compare the efficacy of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow blood pumps on the improvement of PH in mechanical circulatory support patients. Twenty-seven patients with end-stage heart failure who underwent LVAD implantation surgery were enrolled. Fifteen of them (55.6%) had continuous-flow pump (HeartWare Ventricular Assist System, HeartWare, Inc., Miramar, FL, USA), and 12 of them (44.4%) had pulsatile pump (Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist device, Berlin Heart AG, Berlin, Germany). The efficacy of LVADs on the improvement of PH was compared between continuous-flow and pulsatile pumps by the evaluation of systolic PAP, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), right ventricular systolic motion (RVSM), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and grade of tricuspid insufficiency (TI) for each of the study participants. All of the 15 patients who underwent continuous-flow blood pump implantation surgery (Group 1) were male with a mean age of 46.9 +/- 11.7 years, and in pulsatile-flow blood pump implanted participants (Group 2), the mean age was 40.6 +/- 16.8 years, all of whom were also male (P=0.259). Mean follow-up was 313.7 +/- 241.3 days in Group 1 and 448.7 +/- 120.7 days in Group 2 (P=0.139). In Group 1, mean preoperative and postoperative systolic PAP were measured as 51.7 +/- 12.2mmHg and 22.2 +/- 3.4mmHg, respectively, while those in Group 2 were 54.5 +/- 7.5mmHg and 33.9 +/- 6.4mmHg, respectively. A significantly greater decrease in systolic PAP was noticed in patients with continuous-flow blood pumps (P=0.023); however, no statistically significant difference was found when we considered the change in TAPSE between study groups (P=0.112). A statistical significance in the alteration of RVEF, RVSM, and the grade of TI during study visits was not found between the study groups (P=0.472, P=0.887, and P=0.237, respectively). Although the two studied types of LVADs were found to be effective in reducing PAP in heart transplantation candidates with PH, lesser postoperative systolic PAP values were achieved in patients who underwent continuous-flow pump implantation surgery

    Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

    No full text
    © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit
    corecore