An ex vivo Tissue Culture Model for the Assessment of Individualized Drug Responses in Prostate and Bladder Cancer

Urological malignancies, including prostate and bladder carcinoma, represent a major clinical problem due to the frequent occurrence of therapy resistance and the formation of incurable distant metastases. As a result, there is an urgent need for versatile and predictive disease models for the assessment of the individualized drug response in urological malignancies. Compound testing on ex vivo cultured patient-derived tumor tissues could represent a promising approach. In this study, we have optimized an ex vivo culture system of explanted human prostate and bladder tumors derived from clinical specimens and human cancer cell lines xenografted in mice. The explanted and cultured tumor slices remained viable and tissue architecture could be maintained for up to 10 days of culture. Treatment of ex vivo cultured human prostate and bladder cancer tissues with docetaxel and gemcitabine, respectively, resulted in a dose-dependent anti-tumor response. The dose-dependent decrease in tumor cells upon administration of the chemotherapeutic agents was preceded by an induction of apoptosis. The implementation and optimization of the tissue slice technology may facilitate the assessment of anti-tumor efficacies of existing and candidate pharmacological agents in the complex multicellular neoplastic tissues from prostate and bladder cancer patients. Our model represents a versatile “near-patient” tool to determine tumor-targeted and/or stroma-mediated anti-neoplastic responses, thus contributing to the field of personalized therapeutics

18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Purpose of review In this narrative review, we assessed the role of(18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/CT (FDG-PET/CT) in preoperative staging and response evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC), and to assess its incremental value to contrast-enhanced (CE)CT and MRI in terms of patient management at initial diagnosis and detection of recurrence. Recent findings A literature search in PubMed yielded 46 original reports, of which 15 compared FDG-PET/CT with CECT and one with MRI. For primary tumor assessment, FDG-PET/CT proved not accurate enough (13 reports;n = 7-70). For lymph node assessment, sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT is superior to CT with comparable specificity in 19 studies (n = 15-233). For detection of distant metastases, data from eight studies (n = 43-79) suggests that FDG-PET/CT is accurate, although comparative studies are lacking. Limited evidence (four studies,n = 19-50) suggests that FDG-PET/CT is not accurate for response evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FDG-PET/CT incited change(s) in patient management in 18-68% of patients (five reports;n = 57-103). For detection of recurrence, seven studies (n = 29-287) indicated that FDG-PET/CT is accurate. Most studies evaluated FDG-PET/CT for lymph node assessment and reported higher sensitivity than CT, with comparable specificity. FDG-PET/CT showed incremental value to CECT for recurrence and often incited change(s) in patient management

Staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Changes Treatment Recommendation in Invasive Bladder Cancer

Given the high risk of systemic relapse following initial therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), improved pretreatment staging is needed. We evaluated the incremental value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) after standard conventional staging, in the largest cohort of MIBC patients to date. This is a retrospective analysis of 711 consecutive patients with invasive urothelial bladder cancer who underwent staging contrast-enhanced CT (chest and abdomen) and FDG-PET/CT in a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2020. We recorded the clinical stage before and after FDG-PET/CT and treatment recommendation based on the stage before and after FDG-PET/CT. Clinical stage changed after FDG-PET/CT in 184/711 (26%) patients. Consequently, the recommended treatment strategy based on imaging changed in 127/711 (18%) patients. In 65/711 (9.1%) patients, potential curative treatment changed to palliative treatment because of the detection of distant metastases by FDG-PET/CT. Fifty (7.0%) patients were selected for neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy based on FDG-PET/CT. Moreover, FDG-PET/CT detected lesions suspicious for second primary tumors in 15%; a second primary malignancy was confirmed in 28/711 (3.9%), leading to treatment change in ten (1.4%) patients. Contrarily 57/711 (8.1%) had false positive secondary findings. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT provides important incremental staging information, which potentially influences clinical management in 18% of MIBC patients, but leads to false positive results as well. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we investigated the impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scanning on treatment of bladder cancer patients. We found that FDG-PET/CT potentially influences the treatment of almost one-fifth of patients. We therefore suggest performing FDG-PET/CT as part of bladder cancer staging

Staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Changes Treatment Recommendation in Invasive Bladder Cancer

Given the high risk of systemic relapse following initial therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), improved pretreatment staging is needed. We evaluated the incremental value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) after standard conventional staging, in the largest cohort of MIBC patients to date. This is a retrospective analysis of 711 consecutive patients with invasive urothelial bladder cancer who underwent staging contrast-enhanced CT (chest and abdomen) and FDG-PET/CT in a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2020. We recorded the clinical stage before and after FDG-PET/CT and treatment recommendation based on the stage before and after FDG-PET/CT. Clinical stage changed after FDG-PET/CT in 184/711 (26%) patients. Consequently, the recommended treatment strategy based on imaging changed in 127/711 (18%) patients. In 65/711 (9.1%) patients, potential curative treatment changed to palliative treatment because of the detection of distant metastases by FDG-PET/CT. Fifty (7.0%) patients were selected for neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy based on FDG-PET/CT. Moreover, FDG-PET/CT detected lesions suspicious for second primary tumors in 15%; a second primary malignancy was confirmed in 28/711 (3.9%), leading to treatment change in ten (1.4%) patients. Contrarily 57/711 (8.1%) had false positive secondary findings. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT provides important incremental staging information, which potentially influences clinical management in 18% of MIBC patients, but leads to false positive results as well. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we investigated the impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scanning on treatment of bladder cancer patients. We found that FDG-PET/CT potentially influences the treatment of almost one-fifth of patients. We therefore suggest performing FDG-PET/CT as part of bladder cancer staging

Phase 1 Study of Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab for the Curative Treatment of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has a poor prognosis. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in selected patients has comparable results to radical cystectomy. Results of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before radical cystectomy are promising. We hypothesize that ICI concurrent to CRT (iCRT) is safe and may improve treatment outcomes. Objective: To determine the safety of iCRT for MIBC. Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study determined the safety of CRT with three ICI regimens in patients with nonmetastatic (T2-4aN0-1) MIBC. Twenty-six patients received mitomycin C/capecitabine and 20 × 2.75 Gy to the bladder. Tolerability was evaluated in a cohort of up to ten patients. If two or fewer out of the first six patients or three or fewer of ten patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), accrual continued in the next cohort. Intervention: Patients received nivolumab 480 mg (NIVO480), nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (NIVO3 + IPI1), or nivolumab 1 mg/kg and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (IPI3 + NIVO1). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary objectives were response rate, disease-free survival, metastatic-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Results and limitations: In the NIVO480 cohort, no patients experienced DLT. The NIVO3 + IPI1 2 patients experienced DLT, thrombocytopenia (grade 4), and asystole (grade 5). IPI3 + NIVO1 was discontinued after three out of six patients experienced DLT. Clinically significant adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 occurred in zero, three, and five patients in the NIVO480, NIVO3 + IPI1, and IPI3 + NIVO1 groups, respectively. The most common AEs were immune related and gastrointestinal. MFS and OS were 90% at 2 yr for NIVO480 and 90% at 1 yr for NIVO3 + IPI1. Limitations include the absence of a centralized pathology and radiology review, and a lack of biomarker analysis. Conclusions: In this dose-finding study of iCRT, the regimens of nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab 3 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg have acceptable toxicity. Patient summary: We tested the safety of a new bladder-sparing treatment modality for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, combining immune checkpoint inhibitors simultaneously with chemoradiotherapy. We report that two regimens, nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab 3 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg, are safe and can be used in phase 3 trials

Phase 1 Study of Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab for the Curative Treatment of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has a poor prognosis. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in selected patients has comparable results to radical cystectomy. Results of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before radical cystectomy are promising. We hypothesize that ICI concurrent to CRT (iCRT) is safe and may improve treatment outcomes. Objective: To determine the safety of iCRT for MIBC. Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study determined the safety of CRT with three ICI regimens in patients with nonmetastatic (T2-4aN0-1) MIBC. Twenty-six patients received mitomycin C/capecitabine and 20 × 2.75 Gy to the bladder. Tolerability was evaluated in a cohort of up to ten patients. If two or fewer out of the first six patients or three or fewer of ten patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), accrual continued in the next cohort. Intervention: Patients received nivolumab 480 mg (NIVO480), nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (NIVO3 + IPI1), or nivolumab 1 mg/kg and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (IPI3 + NIVO1). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary objectives were response rate, disease-free survival, metastatic-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Results and limitations: In the NIVO480 cohort, no patients experienced DLT. The NIVO3 + IPI1 2 patients experienced DLT, thrombocytopenia (grade 4), and asystole (grade 5). IPI3 + NIVO1 was discontinued after three out of six patients experienced DLT. Clinically significant adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 occurred in zero, three, and five patients in the NIVO480, NIVO3 + IPI1, and IPI3 + NIVO1 groups, respectively. The most common AEs were immune related and gastrointestinal. MFS and OS were 90% at 2 yr for NIVO480 and 90% at 1 yr for NIVO3 + IPI1. Limitations include the absence of a centralized pathology and radiology review, and a lack of biomarker analysis. Conclusions: In this dose-finding study of iCRT, the regimens of nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab 3 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg have acceptable toxicity. Patient summary: We tested the safety of a new bladder-sparing treatment modality for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, combining immune checkpoint inhibitors simultaneously with chemoradiotherapy. We report that two regimens, nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab 3 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg, are safe and can be used in phase 3 trials

Phase 1 Study of Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab for the Curative Treatment of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has a poor prognosis. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in selected patients has comparable results to radical cystectomy. Results of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before radical cystectomy are promising. We hypothesize that ICI concurrent to CRT (iCRT) is safe and may improve treatment outcomes. Objective: To determine the safety of iCRT for MIBC. Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study determined the safety of CRT with three ICI regimens in patients with nonmetastatic (T2-4aN0-1) MIBC. Twenty-six patients received mitomycin C/capecitabine and 20 × 2.75 Gy to the bladder. Tolerability was evaluated in a cohort of up to ten patients. If two or fewer out of the first six patients or three or fewer of ten patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), accrual continued in the next cohort. Intervention: Patients received nivolumab 480 mg (NIVO480), nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (NIVO3 + IPI1), or nivolumab 1 mg/kg and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (IPI3 + NIVO1). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary objectives were response rate, disease-free survival, metastatic-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Results and limitations: In the NIVO480 cohort, no patients experienced DLT. The NIVO3 + IPI1 2 patients experienced DLT, thrombocytopenia (grade 4), and asystole (grade 5). IPI3 + NIVO1 was discontinued after three out of six patients experienced DLT. Clinically significant adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 occurred in zero, three, and five patients in the NIVO480, NIVO3 + IPI1, and IPI3 + NIVO1 groups, respectively. The most common AEs were immune related and gastrointestinal. MFS and OS were 90% at 2 yr for NIVO480 and 90% at 1 yr for NIVO3 + IPI1. Limitations include the absence of a centralized pathology and radiology review, and a lack of biomarker analysis. Conclusions: In this dose-finding study of iCRT, the regimens of nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab 3 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg have acceptable toxicity. Patient summary: We tested the safety of a new bladder-sparing treatment modality for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, combining immune checkpoint inhibitors simultaneously with chemoradiotherapy. We report that two regimens, nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab 3 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg, are safe and can be used in phase 3 trials

Intermediate term survival following open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy in the Netherlands:results of the Cystectomie SNAPSHOT study

There is insufficient knowledge on intermediate-term survival of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after open (ORC) versus robot-assisted (RARC) cystectomy, with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This retrospective study was performed in 19 Dutch hospitals between 2012 and 2015 to assess the five-year survival after both interventions and the influence of NAC. Out of 1,534 cT1-4N0-1-patients, 1,086 patients were treated with ORC and 389 with RARC. The 5-year survival rate after ORC was 51% (95% CI 47–53) versus 58% after RARC (95% CI 52–63), hazard ratio 1.00 (95% CI 0.84–1.20) after multivariable analysis. 226 of 965 cT2-4aN0 patients were treated with NAC. More patients had ypT0 after NAC than after no NAC (31% vs 15%; p?< 0.01). The best five-year survival was in patients with ypT0 after NAC (89%; 95% CI 81–97). This study shows similar five-year survival of MIBC patients treated with ORC or RARC and shows that the best survival was after NAC