19 research outputs found

    Comparison of Dixon Sequences for Estimation of Percent Breast Fibroglandular Tissue.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES:To evaluate sources of error in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) measurement of percent fibroglandular tissue (%FGT) using two-point Dixon sequences for fat-water separation. METHODS:Ten female volunteers (median age: 31 yrs, range: 23-50 yrs) gave informed consent following Research Ethics Committee approval. Each volunteer was scanned twice following repositioning to enable an estimation of measurement repeatability from high-resolution gradient-echo (GRE) proton-density (PD)-weighted Dixon sequences. Differences in measures of %FGT attributable to resolution, T1 weighting and sequence type were assessed by comparison of this Dixon sequence with low-resolution GRE PD-weighted Dixon data, and against gradient-echo (GRE) or spin-echo (SE) based T1-weighted Dixon datasets, respectively. RESULTS:%FGT measurement from high-resolution PD-weighted Dixon sequences had a coefficient of repeatability of ±4.3%. There was no significant difference in %FGT between high-resolution and low-resolution PD-weighted data. Values of %FGT from GRE and SE T1-weighted data were strongly correlated with that derived from PD-weighted data (r = 0.995 and 0.96, respectively). However, both sequences exhibited higher mean %FGT by 2.9% (p < 0.0001) and 12.6% (p < 0.0001), respectively, in comparison with PD-weighted data; the increase in %FGT from the SE T1-weighted sequence was significantly larger at lower breast densities. CONCLUSION:Although measurement of %FGT at low resolution is feasible, T1 weighting and sequence type impact on the accuracy of Dixon-based %FGT measurements; Dixon MRI protocols for %FGT measurement should be carefully considered, particularly for longitudinal or multi-centre studies

    Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations

    Get PDF
    Rationale and ObjectivesTo retrospectively investigate the effect of flip angle (FA) and k-space sampling on the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast sequences.Materials and MethodsFive DCE-MRI breast sequences were evaluated (10°, 14°, and 18° FAs; radial or linear k-space sampling), with 7–10 patients in each group (n = 45). All sequences were compliant with current technical breast screening guidelines. Contrast agent (CA) uptake curves were constructed from the right mammary artery for each examination. Maximum relative enhancement, Emax, and time-to-peak enhancement, Tmax, were measured and compared between protocols (analysis of variance and Mann–Whitney). For each sequence, calculated values of maximum relative enhancement, Ecalc, were derived from the Bloch equations and compared to Emax. Fat suppression performance (residual bright fat and chemical shift artifact) was rated for each examination and compared between sequences (Fisher exact tests).ResultsSignificant differences were identified between DCE-MRI sequences. Emax increased significantly at higher FAs and with linear k-space sampling (P < .0001; P = .001). Radial protocols exhibited greater Tmax than linear protocols at FAs of both 14° (P = .025) and 18° (P < .0001), suggesting artificially flattened uptake curves. Good correlation was observed between Ecalc and Emax (r = 0.86). Fat suppression failure was more pronounced at an FA of 18° (P = .008).ConclusionsThis retrospective approach is validated as a tool to compare and optimize breast DCE-MRI sequences. Alterations in FA and k-space sampling result in significant differences in CA uptake curve shape which could potentially affect diagnostic interpretation. These results emphasize the need for careful parameter selection and greater standardization of breast DCE-MRI sequences

    Bland-Altman plots for repeat high-resolution GRE PD-weighted measurements (HR GRE PD & HR GRE PD (R), respectively).

    No full text
    <p>a) FGT volume [cm<sup>3</sup>]; b) Total breast volume [cm<sup>3</sup>] and c) %FGT [%]. Mean differences and limits of agreement are represented by the central and outer dashed lines, respectively.</p

    Low resolution water fraction images prior to signal correction for two subjects.

    No full text
    <p>A) a 26 year old volunteer with 64.6% FGT and B) a 50 year old volunteer with 18.4% FGT. GRE PD, GRE T<sub>1</sub> and SE T<sub>1</sub>-weighted images are shown in i), ii) and iii), respectively—the water fraction values within the fat are much higher in the SE T<sub>1</sub>-weighted datasets.</p

    High resolution GRE T<sub>1</sub>-weighted Dixon breast images of the right breast in a 31 year old volunteer, showing the effect of signal intensity correction.

    No full text
    <p>A signal intensity correction factor was derived from the maximum water and fat signal intensities within a centrally located region of interest (ROI) on the Water- and Fat-only images (<b>a</b> and <b>b</b>, respectively, each scaled to their maximum signal intensity) and was applied to the Water-only image. The |Water + Fat| and Water Fraction images prior to signal intensity correction are shown in <b>c</b> and <b>e</b>, respectively. The equivalent images following signal intensity correction are displayed in <b>d</b> and <b>f</b>, respectively; <b>d</b> shows clearly the normalized contributions of water and fat following correction of the Water-only image. Calculated %FGT was found to be 34.4%.</p
    corecore