201 research outputs found

    How Love and Lust Change People’s Perception of Partners and Relationships

    Full text link
    Because love is related to thoughts in the distant future and sex triggers thoughts related to the present, based on construal level theory, we propose a link between love and a global processing style as well as a link between lust and a local processing style. These processing styles should further expand to partnership evaluations, partially explaining halo phenomena. In Study 1, college students and senior participants were primed by either imagining a walk with a person they were in love with, or a one-night stand. In Study 2, love and lust were primed subliminally. In all studies, love priming enhanced global, holistic processing and halos, whereas lust priming enhanced local, detail oriented processing and reduced halos. Moreover, in Study 1, temporal distance mediated the effects. Implications for research of moods on processing styles, partner perception, and the distinction between love and lust are discussed

    The man who wasn't there:Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation

    Get PDF
    Life provides an endless stream of social comparison information. Because opportunities to compare with others are so abundant, social comparison theory traditionally assumes that people are selective in their comparison activities and primarily compare with deliberately selected standards. Recent research, however, demonstrates that social comparisons often occur spontaneously, even if no standard is explicitly provided or deliberately selected. We examined whether comparisons are so spontaneous that they are even engaged if people are fleetingly exposed to a potential standard-so fleetingly that they remain unaware of the standard. In three studies, participants were subliminally primed with moderate versus extreme, high versus low standards during self-evaluation. Results demonstrate that self-evaluations are influenced by subliminally presented standards. Specifically, self-evaluations are assimilated towards moderate standards and contrasted away from extreme standards. These self-evaluative consequences of subliminal standards, however, were only obtained if participants engaged in self-reflection during standard exposure. These findings emphasize that social comparisons are truly ubiquitous processes that are engaged even for fleeting exposure to standard information. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</p

    When Ignoring Negative Feedback Is Functional:Presenting a Model of Motivated Feedback Disengagement

    Get PDF
    Contrary to popular belief, negative feedback occasionally hinders performance improvements. Investigations targeting this feedback-performance gap usually rest on two assumptions: (a) Feedback recipients want to improve their performance (have an improvement goal), and (b) feedback recipients engage with the negative feedback. We argue that people sometimes disengage from negative feedback for hedonic-goal attainment (to feel good). To explain such functional feedback disengagement, we conceptualize feedback processing from an emotion-regulation perspective, the model of motivated feedback disengagement. We posit that feedback-induced negative affect may render hedonic goals more salient than improvement goals, motivating emotion regulation. After forming the intention to regulate their emotions, feedback recipients select and implement an emotion-regulation strategy. We consider two common engagement strategies (reappraisal and feedback focus) and two common disengagement strategies (distraction and feedback removal). These strategies differentially impact recipients’ affect and feedback processing. Strategy-, person-, and situation-related factors influence strategy choice. Feedback processing is cyclical and dynamically unfolds over time. The model provides novel directions for future investigations and practical implications for stakeholders in negative-feedback contexts

    Should I have been more careful or less careless? The comparative nature of counterfactual thoughts alters judgments of their impact

    Get PDF
    Counterfactual thoughts inherently imply a comparison of a given reality to an alternative state of affairs. Previous research mainly considered consequences of different counterfactual types, namely focus (other vs. self), structure (additive vs. subtractive), and direction (upward vs. downward). The current work investigates whether a ‘more-than’ versus ‘less-than’ comparative nature of counterfactual thoughts alters judgments of their impact. Four experiments demonstrated that self-generated other- (Studies 1 and 3) and self-focused (Study 2) upward counterfactuals are judged more impactful when they entail ‘more-than’ rather than ‘less-than’ comparisons. Judgments include plausibility and persuasiveness, as well as counterfactuals' likelihood to change future behavior and feelings. Self-reported ease of thought generation and (dis)fluency gauged by difficulty in thought generation was similarly affected. This more-less asymmetry reversed in Study 3 for downward counterfactual thoughts, with ‘less-than’ counterfactuals being judged more impactful and easier to generate. Further attesting to the role of ease, when spontaneously generating comparative counterfactuals, participants correctly provided more ‘more-than’ upward counterfactuals, but more ‘less-than’ downward counterfactuals (Study 4). These findings delineate one of the to date few conditions for a reversal of the more-less asymmetry and provide support for a correspondence principle, the simulation heuristic, and thus the role of ease in counterfactual thinking. They suggest that especially ‘more-than’ counterfactuals following negative events, and ‘less-than’ counterfactuals following positive events, are likely to have an important impact on people

    Semiautomatische Detektion von Skelettbefall im PET/CT bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Hodgkin-Lymphom

    Get PDF
    Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wurde ein Algorithmus zur semiautomatischen Detektion von pathologischen, skelettalen Mehranreicherungen in der 18F-FDG-PET entwickelt, der gleichzeitig als Grundlage fĂŒr die Ermittlung des metabolischen, skelettalen Tumorvolumens diente. Hierzu wurden PET/CT-DatensĂ€tze von Kindern und Jugendlichen, die an einem Hodgkin-Lymphom erkrankt waren und im Zeitraum von 2007 bis 2013 in der EuroNet-PHL-C1-Studie behandelt wurden, analysiert. Bei 142 Kindern war im Rahmen einer zentralen Referenzbeurteilung im PET/CT ein Skelettbefall diagnostiziert und dokumentiert worden. Auf dieser Basis (Goldstandard) erfolgte die Testung verschiedenster Methoden, von denen sich die nachfolgende als die am besten geeignete erwies: Als Referenzregion zur Bestimmung eines physiologischen Stoffwechselniveaus im Skelett (SUVmean) wurde eine 15 bis 30 ml große VOI in einem nach visueller EinschĂ€tzung nicht tumorbefallenen Wirbelkörper (meist LWK 4) platziert. Auf Grundlage des damit ermittelten physiologischen Skelettstoffwechselniveaus identifizierte das Suchprogramm skelettale LĂ€sionen, sofern diese einen SUV > (SUVmean + 2,5 SD) aufwiesen. Dieser in das Programm implementierte Algorithmus wurde an den PET/CT-DatensĂ€tzen der 142 Patienten mit visuell detektiertem Skelettbefall validiert. Dabei wurde ein Skelettbefall bei 130 von 142 Patienten (SensitivitĂ€t auf Patientenebene von 91,5 Prozent) programmbasiert korrekt diagnostiziert. Von 1015 visuell erfassten skelettalen LĂ€sionen wurden 774 durch das Suchprogramm richtig erkannt (SensitivitĂ€t auf Regionenebene von 76,3 Prozent). Von 5375 nicht befallenen Regionen wurden 5137 korrekterweise auch nicht als LĂ€sionen durch das Programm angezeigt (SpezifitĂ€t auf Regionenebene von 95,6 Prozent). Das Ausmaß das Skelettbefalls in Form des metabolischen, skelettalen Tumorvolumens wurde mit dem ereignisfreien Überleben und dem GesamtĂŒberleben verglichen: Es ergab sich keine Korrelation. Die Arbeit umfasst 156 Seiten, 59 Abbildungen, 31 Tabellen und 96 Literaturangaben

    Face masks reduce emotion-recognition accuracy and perceived closeness

    Get PDF
    Face masks became the symbol of the global fight against the coronavirus. While face masks’ medical benefits are clear, little is known about their psychological consequences. Drawing on theories of the social functions of emotions and rapid trait impressions, we tested hypotheses on face masks’ effects on emotion-recognition accuracy and social judgments (perceived trustworthiness, likability, and closeness). Our preregistered study with 191 German adults revealed that face masks diminish people’s ability to accurately categorize an emotion expression and make target persons appear less close. Exploratory analyses further revealed that face masks buffered the negative effect of negative (vs. non-negative) emotion expressions on perceptions of trustworthiness, likability, and closeness. Associating face masks with the coronavirus’ dangers predicted higher perceptions of closeness for masked but not for unmasked faces. By highlighting face masks’ effects on social functioning, our findings inform policymaking and point at contexts where alternatives to face masks are needed

    Grandiose narcissism shapes counterfactual thinking (and regret):Direct and indirect evidence

    Get PDF
    Little is known about how individuals high in grandiose narcissism think about what could have been. Across four studies (three online surveys and one online experiment; N = 801), we addressed this gap by examining the relationship between grandiose narcissism, its admiration and rivalry dimensions, and counterfactual thinking and regret. Unlike anticipated, high rivalry was associated with more rather than fewer upward counterfactuals in Study 1. Yet, high rivalry predicted an increased likelihood of generating a downward (vs. upward) counterfactual in a feedback situation (Study 3). Moreover, grandiose narcissism (preliminary study) and admiration (Study 2) negatively correlated with regret. Collectively, our findings stress the importance of considering grandiose narcissism’s dimensions separately and highlight a novel dispositional moderator of counterfactual thinking

    Empathising with masked targets:Limited side effects of face masks on empathy for dynamic, context-rich stimuli

    Get PDF
    Multiple studies revealed detrimental effects of face masks on communication, including reduced empathic accuracy and enhanced listening effort. Yet, extant research relied on artificial, decontextualised stimuli, which prevented assessing empathy under more ecologically valid conditions. In this preregistered online experiment (N = 272), we used film clips featuring targets reporting autobiographical events to address motivational mechanisms underlying face mask effects on cognitive (empathic accuracy) and emotional facets (emotional congruence, sympathy) of empathy. Surprisingly, targets whose faces were covered by a mask (or a black bar) elicited the same level of empathy motives (affiliation, cognitive effort), and accordingly, the same level of cognitive and emotional empathy compared to targets with uncovered faces. We only found a negative direct effect of face coverings on sympathy. Additional analyses revealed that older (compared to young) adults showed higher empathy, but age did not moderate face mask effects. Our findings speak against strong negative face mask effects on empathy when using dynamic, context-rich stimuli, yet support motivational mechanisms of empathy

    Do episodic counterfactual thoughts focus on personally controllable action?:The role of self-initiation

    Get PDF
    Counterfactual thoughts refer to alternatives to the past. Episodic counterfactual thoughts have in past research been shown to be primarily goal-directed and to engender performance improvement. Some past research supports this perspective with the observation that episodic counterfactuals center mostly on controllable action, whereas other research does not show this. We offer a theoretical resolution for these discrepant findings centering on the role of self-initiation, such that counterfactuals more often focus on internally controllable action to the extent that the circumstance is one that was self-initiated rather than initiated by others. In doing so, we disambiguate two dimensions of causal explanation: locus (self vs. other) and controllability (high vs. low) that previous studies conflated, demonstrating that variation as a function of self-initiation in the content of episodic counterfactuals occurs primarily along the former but not the latter dimension. These results support the functional theory of counterfactual thinking
    • 

    corecore