Discussing prognosis and end-of-life care in the final year of life: A randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led ommunication support programme for patients and caregivers

Introduction: Timely communication about lifeexpectancy and end-of-life care is crucial forensuring good patient quality-of-life at the end of lifeand a good quality of death. This article describes theprotocol for a multisite randomised controlled trial of anurse-led communication support programme tofacilitate patients' and caregivers' efforts tocommunicate about these issues with theirhealthcare team.Methods and analysis: This NHMRC-sponsored trialis being conducted at medical oncology clinics locatedat/affiliated with major teaching hospitals in Sydney,Australia. Patients with advanced, incurable cancer andlife expectancy of less than 12 months will participatetogether with their primary informal caregiver wherepossible. Guided by the self-determination theory ofhealth-behaviour change, the communication supportprogramme pairs a purpose-designed Question PromptList (QPL-an evidence-based list of questionspatients/caregivers can ask clinicians) with nurse-ledexploration of QPL content, communication challenges,patient values and concerns and the value of earlydiscussion of end-of-life issues. Oncologists are alsocued to endorse patient and caregiver question askingand use of the QPL. Behavioural and self-report datawill be collected from patients/caregivers approximatelyquarterly for up to 2.5 years or until patient death, afterwhich patient medical records will be examined.Analyses will examine the impact of the intervention onpatients' and caregivers' participation in medicalconsultations, their self-efficacy in medical encounters,quality-of-life, end-of-life care receipt and quality-ofdeathindicators.Ethics and dissemination: Approvals have beengranted by the human ethics review committee ofRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital and governance officersat each participating site. Results will be reported inpeer-reviewed publications and conferencepresentations.Trial registration number: Australian New ZealandClinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000724077

Strategically Equivalent Contests

Using a two-player Tullock-type contest, we show that intuitively and structurally different contests can be strategically equivalent. Strategically equivalent contests generate the same best response functions and, as a result, the same equilibrium efforts. However, strategically equivalent contests may yield different equilibrium payoffs. We propose a simple two-step procedure to identify strategically equivalent contests. Using this procedure, we identify contests that are strategically equivalent to the original Tullock contest, and provide new examples of strategically equivalent contests. Finally, we discuss possible contest design applications and avenues for future theoretical and empirical research

Patient perspectives regarding communication about prognosis and end-of-life issues: How can it be optimised?

Objective: To explore patients' perspectives across two cultures (Australia and USA) regarding communication about prognosis and end-of-life care issues and to consider the ways in which these discussions can be optimised. Methods: Fifteen Australian and 11 US patients completed individual semi-structured qualitative interviews. A further 8 US patients participated in a focus group. Interviews and focus group recordings were transcribed verbatim and interpreted using thematic text analysis with an inductive, data-driven approach. Results: Global themes identified included readiness for and outcomes of discussions of prognosis and end-of-life issues. Contributing to readiness were sub themes including patients' adjustment to and acceptance of their condition (together with seven factors promoting this), doctor and patient communication skills, mutual understandings and therapeutic relationship elements. Outcomes included sub themes of achievement of control and ability to move on. A model of the relationships between these factors, emergent cross cultural differences, and how factors may help to optimise these discussions are presented. Conclusion: Identified optimising factors illustrate Australian and US patients' perspectives regarding how prognosis and end-of-life issues can be discussed with minimised negative impact. Practice implications: Recognition of factors promoting adjustment, acceptance and readiness and use of the communication skills and therapeutic relationship elements identified may assist in optimising discussions and help patients plan care, achieve more control of their situation and enjoy an optimal quality-of-life. © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd

Patient-Centered Care: An Examination of Provider–Patient Communication Over Time

Objective: To examine the quality of provider communication over time considering the increasing emphasis on patient-centered care (PCC). Patient-centered care has been shown to have a positive impact on health outcomes, care experiences, quality-of-life, as well as decreased costs. Given this emphasis, we expect that provider–patient communication has improved over time. Data Source: We collected primary data by self-report surveys between summer 2017 and fall 2018. Study Design: We use a quantitative retrospective cohort study of a national sample of 353 patients who had an ostomy surgery. Data Extraction Method: We measure provider communication from open-ended self-reports from patients of the number of stated inadequacies in their care. Principal Findings: Results show that the time since patients had their surgery is related to higher quality provider communication. That is, patients who had their surgery further back in time reported higher quality provider communication compared with patients who had their surgery performed more recently. Conclusion: Results suggest that the quality of provider communication has not improved even with an emphasis on PCC.The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research was funded by a “Graduate College Foundation Fellowship from the Department of Sociology and the Graduate College at the University of Oklahoma” to Leslie Miller. The funding does not impact the study in any way. Open Access fees paid for in whole or in part by the University of Oklahoma Libraries.Ye

Recovery after single-breath halothane induction of anaesthesia in daycase patients

A single-breath technique of inhalational induction of anaesthesia allows intravenous induction agents to be avoided. We have investigated recovery from anaesthesia in 40 daycase patients, using tests of psychomotor function. Patients anaesthetised with inhalational induction awaken earlier than those who receive thiopentone, but not significantly earlier. There were no significant differences in postoperative psychomotor function between patients who received thiopentone and those who had inhalational inductions. Single-breath halothane, nitrous-oxide, oxygen induction is an alternative to intravenous induction in cooperative adults, but does not confer significant benefits in terms of recovery.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75757/1/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06685.x.pd

The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation

A total of 600 patients from cancer centres throughout the UK identified their most preferred and most disliked descriptions of randomisation found in current patient information sheets and websites. The CancerBACUP description, which describes both the process of randomisation and why it is done, was most preferred 151 out of 533 (28%) patients. The NCI description was viewed as overly technical and most disliked 185 out of 483 (38%) patients

Choice of outcomes and measurement instruments in randomised trials on eLearning in medical education: A systematic mapping review protocol

Background: There will be a lack of 18 million healthcare workers by 2030. Multiplying the number of well-trained healthcare workers through innovative ways such as eLearning is highly recommended in solving this shortage. However, high heterogeneity of learning outcomes in eLearning systematic reviews reveals a lack of consistency and agreement on core learning outcomes in eLearning for medical education. In addition, there seems to be a lack of validity evidence for measurement instruments used in these trials. This undermines the credibility of these outcome measures and affects the ability to draw accurate and meaningful conclusions. The aim of this research is to address this issue by determining the choice of outcomes, measurement instruments and the prevalence of measurement instruments with validity evidence in randomised trials on eLearning for pre-registration medical education. Methods: We will conduct a systematic mapping and review to identify the types of outcomes, the kinds of measurement instruments and the prevalence of validity evidence among measurement instruments in eLearning randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in pre-registration medical education. The search period will be from January 1990 until August 2017. We will consider studies on eLearning for health professionals' education. Two reviewers will extract and manage data independently from the included studies. Data will be analysed and synthesised according to the aim of the review. Discussion: Appropriate choice of outcomes and measurement tools is essential for ensuring high-quality research in the field of eLearning and eHealth. The results of this study could have positive implications for other eHealth interventions, including (1) improving quality and credibility of eLearning research, (2) enhancing the quality of digital medical education and (3) informing researchers, academics and curriculum developers about the types of outcomes and validity evidence for measurement instruments used in eLearning studies. The protocol aspires to assist in the advancement of the eLearning research field as well as in the development of high-quality healthcare professionals' digital education. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD4201706842

Prostate Cancer and Race

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72215/1/j.1525-1497.2003.30801.x.pd